Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T16:37:08.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Legal Taxonomy From Sweet & Maxwell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2010

Abstract

Mark Scott and Nigel Smith provide the background to the development of Sweet & Maxwell's Legal Taxonomy before outlining its structure and explaining how it is used by Sweet & Maxwell and other Thomson Reuters companies.

Type
Cat, Class and Metadata.....Part 2
Copyright
Copyright © The British and Irish Association of Law Librarians 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Footnotes

1 Sainsbury, I.M. (1974) Legal Subject Headings for Libraries. London, ButterworthsGoogle Scholar.

2 Krieger, T. (1982) Subject Headings for the Literature of Law and International Law. 3rd ed.Littleton, RothmanGoogle Scholar.

3 Moys, E.M. (1982) Moys Classification Scheme for Law Books. 2nd ed.London, ButterworthsGoogle Scholar.

4 Smith, N. and Miskin, C. (1987) A Legal Thesaurus. Hebden Bridge, Legal Information ResourcesGoogle Scholar. Miskin, C. (2001) A Legal Thesaurus. 4th ed. (Fourth Revision). Hebden Bridge, Sweet & MaxwellGoogle Scholar.

5 Smith and Miskin. (1987) Legal Thesaurus, introduction.

6 Smith, N. (1989) Indexing Legal Journals. Law Librarian, 20(1), 16.Google Scholar

7 Miskin, C. (1997) A Legal Thesaurus. 3rd ed.Hebden Bridge, Legal Information ResourcesGoogle Scholar, p.ii.