Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-tr9hg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-19T00:47:19.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Problem of Voluntariness and Coercion in the Negotiated Plea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 1979

Conrad G. Brunk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper focuses on the narrow question whether prosecutorial or judicial negotiation of a reduced charge or sentence for a criminal defendant in exchange for a guilty plea renders the plea “involuntary.” I begin by clarifying the conditions under which choices in general are considered voluntary or coerced. In Part II, I measure the practice of plea bargaining against this general theory of voluntary choice. I argue that a negotiated guilty plea is not intrinsically involuntary but that many of the conditions commonly a part of plea bargaining may render it so. The negotiated plea can be defended from the charge of coercion only if these conditions can be, and are, eliminated. I also show that overt “threats” of prosecutorial or judicial reprisal are not the only way of coercing a guilty plea. Under certain conditions, apparent “offers” of leniency can be coercive as well.

Type
Philosophical Implications
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , Winter 1979 , pp. 527 - 553
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Law and Society Association.

Footnotes

An early draft of this paper was read in the Colloquium Series of the University of Waterloo Department of Philosophy; the comments and criticism of those who participated have been helpful. Richard Abel has been instrumental in helping me clarify several crucial points in the paper. I am especially indebted to my former colleague at Oakland University, Thomas Church, Jr., whose research and philosophical reflections, shared with me in many hours of dialogue, have been invaluable in shaping and clarifying my own thinking on this issue.

References

ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1968) “The Prosecutor's Role in Plea Bargaining,” 36 University of Chicago Law Review 50.Google Scholar
ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1975) “The Supreme Court, the Defense Attorney, and the Guilty Plea,” 47 University of Colorado Law Review 1.Google Scholar
ALSCHULER, Albert W. (1978) “Plea Bargaining and Its History.” Presented at the Special National Workshop on Plea Bargaining, French Lick, Indiana (June 14-17).Google Scholar
AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE (1933) Restatement of Contracts. St. Paul: American Law Institute.Google Scholar
BAY, Christian (1958) The Structure of Freedom. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
BLUMBERG, Abraham S. (1967) Criminal Justice. Chicago: Quadrangle Books.Google Scholar
DOBBS, Dan B. (1973) Handbook on the Law of Remedies. Saint Paul: West Publishing Co.Google Scholar
DWORKIN, Gerald (1970) “Acting Freely,” 4 Nous 367.Google Scholar
FERGUSON, Gerard A. and Darrell W., ROBERTS (1974) “Plea Bargaining: Directions for Canadian Reform” 52 Canadian Bar Review 297.Google Scholar
FRANKFURT, Harry G. (1973) “Coercion and Moral Responsibility” in Hondereich, Ted (ed.) Essays on Freedom of Action. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
GROSMAN, Brian (1960) The Prosecutor. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
HARVARD LAW REVIEW (1970) “Comment: The Unconstitutionality of Plea Bargaining,” 83 Harvard Law Review 1387.Google Scholar
HOGARTH, John (1971) Sentencing as a Human Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781487599553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KIPNIS, Kenneth (1976) “Criminal Justice and the Negotiated Plea,” 86 Ethics 93.Google Scholar
KLEIN, John F. (1976) Let's Make a Deal. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
McCALLUM, Gerald Jr. (1967) “Negative and Positive Freedom,” 76 Philosophical Review 312.Google Scholar
NOZICK, Robert (1969) “Coercion” in Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick, and White, Morton (eds.) Philosophy, Science, and Method. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
PRESIDENT'S COMMISSION ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE (1967) Task Force Report: The Courts. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
SCHELLING, Thomas (1966) Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
SKOLNICK, Jerome (1966) Justice without Trial. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
U.S. NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMISSION ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND GOALS (1973) Courts. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
YALE LAW JOURNAL (1956) “Comment: The Influence of the Defendant's Plea on Judicial Determination of Sentence,” 66 Yale Law Journal 204.Google Scholar