Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T03:09:48.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Framing Justice: Taxpayer Evaluations of Personal Tax Burdens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Karyl A. Kinsey ,
Harold G. Grasmick  and
Kent W. Smith
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This study examines how taxpayers evaluate the distributive justice of personal income tax burdens. Using the concept of framing from behavioral decision theory, we suggest that taxpayers employ either an outcome-processing or a norm-processing frame of tax fairness evaluation. Framing is affected by substantive tax policies and the tax situations of individuals. Taxpayers who qualify for tax deductions and other tax preferences employ an outcome-processing frame and focus on perceived abuses of government power when evaluating fairness. Those unable to claim tax breaks employ a norm-processing frame and focus on vertical social comparisons and their inability to qualify for valued tax breaks. The findings suggest that tax avoidance policies have the net effect of increasing public perceptions of unfairness in the tax system.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , 1991 , pp. 845 - 873
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

Our thanks to Fay Lomax Cook, Susan P. Shapiro, Loretta J. Stalans, E. Allan Lind, Shari Seidman Diamond, and anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

ADAMS, J. Stacey (1965) “Inequity in Social Exchange,” in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), 2 Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
BERGER, Joseph, Morris, ZELDITCH Jr., Bo, ANDERSON, and Bernard P., COHEN (1972) “Structural Aspects of Distributive Justice: A Status Value Formulation,” in Berger, J., Zelditch, M., and Anderson, B. (eds.), 2 Sociological Theories in Progress. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
BLAU, Peter M. (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
CAMERER, C. F., and MacCRIMMON, K. R. (1983) “Underground and Overpaid: Equity Theory in Practice,” in Messick, D. M. and Cook, K. S. (eds.), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
CARROLL, John S. (1987) “Compliance with the Law: A Decision-making Approach to Taxpaying,” 11 Law and Human Behavior 319.Google Scholar
CONVERSE, Phillip E. (1964) “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics,” in Apter, D. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
CONVERSE, Phillip E. (1970) “Attitudes and Non-Attitudes: Continuation of a Dialogue,” in Tufte, E. R. (ed.), The Quantitative Analysis of Social Problems. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
CROSBY, Faye J. (1982) Relative Deprivation and Working Women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CROSBY, Faye J., and GONZALEZ-INTAL, A. M. (1984) “Relative Deprivation and Equity Theories: Felt Injustice and the Undeserved Benefits of Others,” in Folger, R. (ed.), The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
DEUTSCH, Morton (1975) “Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used for Distributive Justice?” 31 Journal of Social Issues 137.Google Scholar
EKSTRAND, L. E. (1980) “Factors Affecting Compliance: Focus Group and Survey Results,” Proceedings of the 73rd Annual Conference on Taxation. Washington, DC: National Tax Association.Google Scholar
ETZIONI, Amitai (1988) The Moral Dimension. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
FISKE, Susan T., and Shelley E., TAYLOR (1984) Social Cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
FOLGER, Robert (1984) “Emerging Issues in the Social Psychology of Justice,” in Folger, R. (ed.), The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAMILL, Ruth C., Milton, LODGE, and Frederick, BLAKE (1985) “The Breadth, Depth, and Utility of Class, Partisan, and Ideological Schemata,” 29 American Journal of Political Science 850.Google Scholar
HARRIS, INC. (1987) Taxpayer Survey. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
HAWTHORNE, Michael R., and John E., JACKSON (1987) “The Individual Political Economy of Federal Tax Policy,” 81 American Political Science Review 757.Google Scholar
HOMANS, George C. (1974) Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. Rev. ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.Google Scholar
HURWITZ, Jon, and Mark, PEFFLEY (1987) “How Are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierararchical Model,” 81 American Political Science Review 1099.Google Scholar
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (1987) Internal Revenue Service Annual Report, 1987. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
KAHNEMAN, Daniel, KNETSCH, Jack L., and Richard, THALER (1986) “Fairness as Constraints on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market,” 76 American Economic Review 728.Google Scholar
KAHNEMAN, Daniel, and Amos, TVERSKY (1984) “Choices, Values, and Frames,” 39 American Psychologist 341.Google Scholar
KINDER, Donald R., and David O., SEARS (1985) “Political Psychology,” in Lindzey, G. and Aronson, E. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. 3d ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
KINSEY, Karyl A., and Harold G., GRASMICK (1991) “Perceived Fairness and the Tax Reform Act of 1986.” Unpublished, American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
LANE, Robert E. (1962) Political Ideology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
LERNER, Melvin J., and Dale T., MILLER (1978) “Just World Research and the Attribution Process: Looking Back and Ahead,” 85 Psychological Bulletin 1030.Google Scholar
LEVI, Margaret (1988) Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
LIND, E. Allan, and TYLER, Tom R. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MANVEL, A. D. (1990) “Updated Measures of Tax Expenditures,” Tax Notes, 10 Sept., 1433.Google Scholar
MARTIN, Joanne, and Alan, MURRAY (1983) “Distributive Justice and Unfair Exchange,” in Messick, D. M. and Cook, K. S. (eds.), Equity Theory: Psychological and Sociological Perspectives. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
MASON, Robert, and Lyle D., CALVIN (1978) “A Study of Admitted Income Tax Evasion,” 13 Law & Society Review 73.Google Scholar
McGRAW, Kathleen M. (1989) “The Influence of Fairness and Outcomes on Evaluations of Tax Experience.” Presented at 1989 Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, June, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
NIEBUHR, H. Richard (1963) The Responsible Self. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
PECHMAN, Joseph A. (1977) Federal Tax Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
PERIN, Constance (1977) Everything in Its Place: Social Order and Land Use in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
PORCANO, T. M. (1988) “Correlates of Tax Evasion,” 9 Journal of Economic Psychology 47.Google Scholar
RABINOWITZ, V. C., J., KARUZA, and M. A., ZEVON (1984) “Fairness and Effectiveness in Premeditated Helping,” in Folger, R. (ed.), The Sense of Injustice: Social Psychological Perspectives. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
RASINSKI, Kenneth A. (1987) “What's Fair Is Fair … or Is It? Value Differences Underlying Public Views about Social Justice,” 54 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 201.Google Scholar
RASINSKI, Kenneth A., and S. M., ROSENBAUM (1987) “Predicting Citizen Support of Tax Increases for Education: A Comparison of Two Social Psychological Perspectives,” 17 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 990.Google Scholar
SAMPSON, Edward E. (1986) “Justice Ideology and Social Legitimation: A Revised Agenda for Psychological Inquiry,” in Bierhoff, H. W., Cohen, R. L., and Greenberg, J. (eds.), Justice in Social Relations. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
SCOTT, Wilbur J., and Harold G., GRASMICK (1981) “Deterrence and Income Tax Cheating: Testing Interaction Hypotheses in Utilitarian Theories,” 17 Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 395.Google Scholar
SEARS, David O., LAU, Richard R., TYLER, Tom R., and Harris M., ALLEN Jr. (1980) “Self-Interest versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting,” 74 American Political Science Review 670.Google Scholar
SEARS, David O., and Jack, CITRIN (1982) Tax Revolt: Something for Nothing in California. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
SLEMROD, Joel, and Nikki, SORUM (1984) “The Compliance Cost of the U.S. Individual Income Tax System,” 37 National Tax Journal 461.Google Scholar
SMITH, Kent W., and Karyl A., KINSEY (1987) “Understanding Taxpaying Behavior: A Conceptual Framework with Implications for Research,” 21 Law & Society Review 639.Google Scholar
SPICER, Michael W. (1974) “A Behavioral Model of Income Tax Evasion.” Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
SWINGEN, Judyth A. (1989) “Taxpayer Attitudes and Equity Perceptions after the Tax Reform Act of 1986.” Presented at the 1989 IRS Research Conference, Nov., Washington, DC.Google Scholar
TETLOCK, P. E., and A., LEVI (1982) “Attribution Bias: On the Inconclusiveness of the Cognition-Motivation Debate,” 18 Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 68.Google Scholar
THURMAN, Quint C., JOHN, Craig ST., and Lisa, RIGGS (1984) “Neutralization and the Tax Evasion Decision: How Effective Would a Moral Appeal Be in Improving Compliance with Tax Laws?” 6 Law & Policy 309.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R. (1988) “The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group Value Model.” Working Paper 28, Dispute Resolution Research Center, J. L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R., CASPER, Jonathan D., and Bonnie, FISHER (1989) “Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedures,” 33 American Journal of Political Science 612.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R., RASINSKI, Kenneth A., and Eugene, GRIFFIN (1986) “Alternative Images of the Citizen: Implications for Public Policy,” 41 American Psychologist 970.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R., RASINSKI, Kenneth A., and McGRAW, Kathleen M. (1985) “The Influence of Perceived Injustice on the Endorsement of Political Leaders,” 15 Journal of Applied Social Psychology 700.Google Scholar
TYLER, Tom R., RASINSKI, Kenneth A., and Nancy, SPODICK (1985) “The Influence of Voice on Satisfication with Leaders: Exploring the Meaning of Process Control,” 48 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72.Google Scholar
WAHLUND, Richard (1989) “Perception and Judgment of Marginal Tax Rates after a Tax Reduction,” in Grunert, K. G. and Olander, F. (eds.), Understanding Economic Behavior. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.Google Scholar
WALSTER, Elaine, WALSTER, G. William, and Ellen, BERSCHEID (1978) Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
WEGENER, B. (1990) “Equity, Relative Deprivation, and the Value Consensus Paradox,” 4 (1) Social Justice Research 65.Google Scholar
WRIGHT, J. (1981) “Political Disaffection,” in Long, S. (ed.), 4 Handbook of Political Behavior. New York, Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YANKELOVICH, SKELLY, WHITE, AND (1984) Taxpayer Attitude Survey: Final Report. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar