Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T17:00:50.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regime Change and Property Rights Consciousness in Postcommunist Romania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mihaela Şerban
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article analyzes rights consciousness as distinct from legal consciousness, and uses the post-1989 housing restitution in Romania to study property rights consciousness as a type of rights consciousness. I argue that property rights consciousness is only partially an outcome of state power and the political regime, and that rights consciousness more generally must be explicitly analyzed beyond formal rights, legal mobilization, and litigation. I explore sources of rights consciousness for former owners and their heirs, state tenants, and lawyers. Sources of rights consciousness include state policies under distinct property regimes, value systems and ideologies, history, identity, practices, supranational actors, and expectations of what rights can deliver. I find clear distinctions between legal and rights consciousness, as well as variations between and within the groups. The article is based on extensive archival research, interviews conducted in the city of Timişoara, Romania, textbooks, academic articles, and court decisions pre- and post-1989.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , Summer 2018 , pp. 732 - 763
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abrego, Leisy J. 2011. Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims-Making for First- and 1.5-Generation Immigrants. Law & Society Review 45 (2): 337–70.Google Scholar
Association of Owners Forcibly Dispossessed by the State (APDAS). 1993, 1994. Internal Memoranda. (In author's possession.)Google Scholar
Autoritatea Naţională pentru Restituirea Proprietăţilor [National Authority for the Property Restitution]. 2015. Stadiul de Soluţionare a Dosarelor la Data de 05.11.2015 [The Status of Resolving Claims on May 11, 2015]. http://www.anrp.gov.ro (accessed February 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Baias, F., Dumitrache, B., and Nicolae, M. 2001. Regimul Juridic al Imobilelor Preluate Abuziv. Vol. I: Legea Nr. 10/2001 Comentată şi Adnotată [The Legal Situation of Nationalized Property. 1st Volume: Law 1/2001 Discussed and Annotated]. Bucharest: Rosetti.Google Scholar
Barkan, Elazar. 2000. The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Chelcea, Liviu. 2004. State, Kinship and Urban Transformations During and After Housing Nationalization. Ph.D. Diss. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Ciobanu, Monica. 2013. Recent Restorative Justice Measures in Romania (2006–2010). Problems of Post-Communism 60 (5): 45–57.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John, and Comaroff, Jean L. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2011. Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights: Summary of Selected Judgments and Decisions on Property Restitution/Compensation. http://www.coe.int (accessed February 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Csongor, Kuti. 2009. Post-Communist Restitution and the Rule of Law. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Dawidson, Karin E. K. 2004. Conflicts of Interest in the Restitution and Privatization of Housing Since the Fall of Socialism: The Case of Central Timişoara City—A Problem of Democracy? Europe-Asia Studies 56 (1): 119–41.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2004. Closing the Books: Transitional Justice in Historical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Engel, David. 2012. Vertical and Horizontal Perspectives on Rights Consciousness. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 19:423–55.Google Scholar
Engel, David, and Frank, Munger. 2003. Rights of Inclusion: Law and Identity in the Life Stories of Americans with Disabilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
European Court of Human Rights. 2013. The European Court of Human Rights in Facts and Figures. http://www.echr.coe.int (accessed February 12, 2016).Google Scholar
European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies (DGIP), Policy Department: Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs. 2010. Private Properties Issues Following the Change of Political Regime in Former Socialist or Communist Countries. Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Romania and Serbia. http://www.europarl.europa.eu (accessed February 12, 2016)Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Commonplace of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Federation of the Jewish Communities of Romania. 1993. The Jews in Romania between 1940–1944 (Vol. I, II). Bucharest: Hasefer.Google Scholar
Fekete, Gheorghe. 1954. Cu Privire la Problema Proprietăţii Personale [Regarding the Problem of Personal Property]. Justiţia Nouă 2.Google Scholar
Friling, Tuvia, Ioanid, Radu, and Ionescu, Mihail. 2004. Final Report of the International Commission of the Holocaust in Romania. Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
Frydman, R., and Rapaczynski, A. 1994. Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the State Withering Away? Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, Stephen. 2000. Models of Transitional Justice—A Comparative Analysis. International Studies Association Annual Convention, Los Angeles, CA, March 14–18.Google Scholar
Hamangiu, Constantin, Rosetti-Bălănescu, Ion, and Băicoianu, Alexandru. 2002. Tratat de Drept Civil Roman [Treatise of Romanian Civil Law]. Bucureşti: All Beck.Google Scholar
Hann, Chris. 2000. The Tragedy of the Privates? Postsocialist Property Relations in Anthropological Perspective. Working Paper 2. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.Google Scholar
Karadjova, Marianna. 2004. Property Restitution in Eastern Europe: Domestic and International Human Rights Responses. Review of Central and Eastern Europe Law 3:325–63.Google Scholar
Kritz, Neil J., ed. 1995. Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Li, Lianjiang. 2009. Rights Consciousness and Rules Consciousness in Contemporary China. Presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, ON, Canada, September 2–6.Google Scholar
Lorentzen, Peter, and Scoggins, Suzanne. 2015. Understanding China's Rising Rights Consciousness. http://www.peterlorentzen.com (accessed February 12, 2016).Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. (1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Markovits, Inga S. 2007. The Death of Socialist Law? Annual Review of Law and Social Science 3:233–53.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2014. The Unbearable Lightness of Rights: On Sociolegal Inquiry in the Global Era. Law & Society Review 48 (2): 245–74.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 1990. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness Among Working-Class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2006. Human Rights and Gender Violence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2014. Inequality and Rights: Commentary on Michael McCann's “The Unbearable Lightness of Rights.” Law & Society Review 48 (2): 285–96.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E., Levitt, Peggy, Rosen, Mihaela Şerban, and Yoon, Diana. 2010. Law from Below: Women's Human Rights and Social Movements in New York City. Law & Society Review 44 (1): 101–28.Google Scholar
Mioc, Eugen. 2007. Comunismul în Banat [Communism in Banat]. Timisoara: Editura Excelsior Art.Google Scholar
Munteanu, Ioan, and Munteanu, Rodica. 2002 Timişoara. Monografie [Timişoara. A Monography]. Timişoara, Mirton.Google Scholar
National Archives of Romania. 1957. Collection Sfatul Popular Banat, Juridic, File No 22/1957.Google Scholar
National Archives of Romania. 1960. Collection Sfatul Popular Banat, Secretariat, File No 102/1960.Google Scholar
National Institute of Statistics. 2002. Populaţia După Etnie la Recensămintele din Perioada 1930–2002 [Census by ethnicity]. http://www.insse.ro/cms/files/RPL2002INS/vol4/tabele/t1.pdf (accessed June 2, 2016).Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 2014. Of Rights and Favors. Law & Society Review 48 (2): 275–84.Google Scholar
Neumann, Victor. 2013. Timişoara Between “Fictive Ethnicity” and “Ideal Nation.” The Identity Profile During the Interwar Period. Balcanica 44:391–412.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2004. License to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Osanloo, Arzoo. 2009. The Politics of Women's Rights in Iran. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ponta, Victor. 2013. Prime Minister's Speech Before Parliament, April 17. http://www.gov.ro (accessed February 12, 2016).Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1982. Property and Personhood. Stanford Law Review 34:957–1015.Google Scholar
Romanian Academic Society (SAR). 2008. Property Restitution: What Went Wrong in Romania? Policy Brief 34:9–12. http://www.sar.org (accessed January 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Rotman, Liviu. 2004. Evreii din România în Perioada Comunistă [The Jews in Romania During Communism]. Iasi: Polirom.Google Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart. 2004. The Politics of Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Şerban, Mihaela. 2010. Surviving Property: Resistance Against Urban Housing Nationalization During the Transition to Communism (Romania, 1950–1965). Special Issue: Interdisciplinary Legal Studies: The Next Generation, Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 51:29–66.Google Scholar
Şerban, Mihaela. 2014. The Loss of Property Rights and the Construction of Legal Consciousness in Early Socialist Romania (1950–1965). Law & Society Review 48 (4): 773–805.Google Scholar
Şerban, Mihaela. 2015. The Exceptionalism of Housing: Ideology and Politics in Early Communism in Romania (1945–1965). Europe-Asia Studies 67 (3): 443–67.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan. 2005. After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1:323–68.Google Scholar
Stan, Lavinia. 2006. The Roof Over Our Heads: Property Restitution in Romania. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22:180–205.Google Scholar
Stan, Lavinia. 2013. Denying Justice by Delaying It? The ECHR and Property Restitution in Romania. Journal of Property Rights in Transition. http://propertyrightsintransition.com/denying-justice-by-delaying-it (accessed January 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2000. Transitional Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Timişoara City Hall. 2008, 2013. Mayor's Report, Legal Department. http://www.primariatm.ro (accessed January 13, 2016).Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom, and Huo, Y. J. 2002. Trust in the Law. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Underkuffler, Laura. 2003. The Idea of Property: Its Meaning and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vasiliu, Adrian. 1992. De Facto Captando. Cotidianul, February 17.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine. 1998. Fuzzy Property: Rights, Power, and Identity in Transylvania's Decollectivization. In Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies, ed. Joan M. Nelson, Charles Tilly, and Lee Walker. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine. 2003. The Vanishing Hectare. Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2004. Property. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2004 Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2004/entries/property/ (accessed 2010).Google Scholar
Case of Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, ECHR (2010).Google Scholar
Case of Strain and Others v. Romania, ECHR (2005).Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 126/November 16, 1994, Official Monitor 74/April 25, 1995.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 62/June 13, 1995, Official Monitor 122/June 19, 1995.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 73/July 19, 1995, Official Monitor 177/August 8, 1995.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 2/February 3, 1998, Official Monitor 146/April 10, 1998.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 232/May 10, 2013, Official Monitor 359/June 17, 2013.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 80/February 16, 2014, Official Monitor 246/April 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 88/February 27, 2014, Official Monitor 281/April 16, 2014.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 197/April 3, 2014, Official Monitor 448/June 19, 2014.Google Scholar
Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, ECHR (1982).Google Scholar
Tudor v. Romania, ECHR (2009).Google Scholar
Civil Code of Romania (1864). http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/1 (accessed September 9, 2016).Google Scholar
Constitutions of Romania, 1948, 1952, 1965, 1991. http://legislatie.just.ro (accessed September 9, 2016).Google Scholar
Decree 92/April 19, 1950 concerning the nationalization of some real estate. Official Bulletin 36/April 20, 1950.Google Scholar
Decree-Law 61/February 7, 1990 concerning the selling of state housing to the population. Official Monitor 22/February 2, 1990.Google Scholar
Emergency Ordinance 83/June 8, 1999 regulating the restitution of buildings that belonged to ethnic minorities. Official Monitor 266/June 10, 1999.Google Scholar
Emergency Ordinance 94/June 29, 2000 on the restitution of buildings belonging to religious groups. Official Monitor 308/July 4, 2000.Google Scholar
Law 18/February 19, 1991 concerning land. Official Monitor 37/February 20, 1991.Google Scholar
Law 112/November 25, 1995 regulating the legal status of some housing transferred into state property. Official Monitor 279/November 29, 1995.Google Scholar
Law 54/March 2, 1998 regulating the circulation of land. Official Monitor 102/March 4, 1998.Google Scholar
Law 1/January 11, 2000 on the reconstitution of property rights over agricultural land and forests. Official Monitor 8/January 12, 2000.Google Scholar
Law 10/February 8, 2001 concerning the restitution of buildings abusively seized between March 6, 1945 and December 22, 1989. Official Monitor 75/February 14, 2001.Google Scholar
Law 247/July 19, 2005 on reforming property and justice. Official Monitor 653/July 22, 2005.Google Scholar
Law 165/May 16, 2013 on finalizing housing restitution. Official Monitor 278/May 17, 2013.Google Scholar
Law 168/June 29, 2015, amending Law 165/May 16, 2013. Official Monitor 473/June 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Law 103/May 23, 2016 concerning the finalization of restitution and the restitution of buildings belonging to religious groups. Official Monitor 394/May 24, 2016.Google Scholar
Case of Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania, ECHR (2010).Google Scholar
Case of Strain and Others v. Romania, ECHR (2005).Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 126/November 16, 1994, Official Monitor 74/April 25, 1995.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 62/June 13, 1995, Official Monitor 122/June 19, 1995.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 73/July 19, 1995, Official Monitor 177/August 8, 1995.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 2/February 3, 1998, Official Monitor 146/April 10, 1998.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 232/May 10, 2013, Official Monitor 359/June 17, 2013.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 80/February 16, 2014, Official Monitor 246/April 7, 2014.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 88/February 27, 2014, Official Monitor 281/April 16, 2014.Google Scholar
Constitutional Court Decision 197/April 3, 2014, Official Monitor 448/June 19, 2014.Google Scholar
Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, ECHR (1982).Google Scholar
Tudor v. Romania, ECHR (2009).Google Scholar
Civil Code of Romania (1864). http://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/1 (accessed September 9, 2016).Google Scholar
Constitutions of Romania, 1948, 1952, 1965, 1991. http://legislatie.just.ro (accessed September 9, 2016).Google Scholar
Decree 92/April 19, 1950 concerning the nationalization of some real estate. Official Bulletin 36/April 20, 1950.Google Scholar
Decree-Law 61/February 7, 1990 concerning the selling of state housing to the population. Official Monitor 22/February 2, 1990.Google Scholar
Emergency Ordinance 83/June 8, 1999 regulating the restitution of buildings that belonged to ethnic minorities. Official Monitor 266/June 10, 1999.Google Scholar
Emergency Ordinance 94/June 29, 2000 on the restitution of buildings belonging to religious groups. Official Monitor 308/July 4, 2000.Google Scholar
Law 18/February 19, 1991 concerning land. Official Monitor 37/February 20, 1991.Google Scholar
Law 112/November 25, 1995 regulating the legal status of some housing transferred into state property. Official Monitor 279/November 29, 1995.Google Scholar
Law 54/March 2, 1998 regulating the circulation of land. Official Monitor 102/March 4, 1998.Google Scholar
Law 1/January 11, 2000 on the reconstitution of property rights over agricultural land and forests. Official Monitor 8/January 12, 2000.Google Scholar
Law 10/February 8, 2001 concerning the restitution of buildings abusively seized between March 6, 1945 and December 22, 1989. Official Monitor 75/February 14, 2001.Google Scholar
Law 247/July 19, 2005 on reforming property and justice. Official Monitor 653/July 22, 2005.Google Scholar
Law 165/May 16, 2013 on finalizing housing restitution. Official Monitor 278/May 17, 2013.Google Scholar
Law 168/June 29, 2015, amending Law 165/May 16, 2013. Official Monitor 473/June 30, 2015.Google Scholar
Law 103/May 23, 2016 concerning the finalization of restitution and the restitution of buildings belonging to religious groups. Official Monitor 394/May 24, 2016.Google Scholar