Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T21:03:11.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Law's Allure in American Politics and Policy: What It Is, What It Is Not, and What It Might Yet Be

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Gordon Silverstein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Responding to a set of review essays, the author of Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics (Silverstein 2009) argues that politicians and policy entrepreneurs fail to calculate the risks of juridification—the judicialization of policy combined with the legalization of politics itself—which have expanded and accelerated in the United States in recent decades. Paradigmatic case studies (on subjects including poverty, electoral districting, automated budgeting, war powers, abortion laws, and the regulation of tobacco as well as the environment) illustrate the risks of various patterns of juridification and construct an agenda for future research.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , Fall 2010 , pp. 1077 - 1097
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2010 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Jeb. 2010. Law's Allure and an Interbranch Perspective on Law and Politics. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 35 (4): 1029–40.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2008. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander. 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Cahn, Jean, and Cahn, Edgar. 1964. The War on Poverty: A Civilian Perspective. Yale Law Journal 73:1317–52.Google Scholar
Cahn, Jean, and Cahn, Edgar. 1970. Power to the People or the Profession? The Public Interest in Public Interest Law. Yale Law Journal 79:1005–48.Google Scholar
Cortner, Richard. 2001. Civil Rights and Public Accommodations: The Heart of Atlanta Motel and McClung Cases. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Dickson, Del, ed. 2001. The Supreme Court in Conference (1940–1985). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ehrenreich, Barbara. 1989. Mothers Unite. New Republic, July 10, 30.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2010. Law's Allure and the Power of Path‐Dependent Legal Ideas. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 35 (4): 1041–51.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew, Quinn, Kevin, and Segal, Jeffrey. 2007. Ideological Drift among Supreme Court Justices: Who, When and How Important? Northwestern Law Review 101 (4): 1484–1541.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm. 1992. The Supreme Court and Social Change: Hollow Hopes, Flypaper, and Metaphors. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4): 745–60.Google Scholar
Feeley, Malcolm, and Rubin, Edward. 2000. Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Court Reformed America's Prisons. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frost, Robert. 1921. The Road Not Taken. In Mountain Interval, 9. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1983. The Radiating Effects of Courts. In Empirical Theories of Courts, ed. Boyum, Keith and Mather, Lynn, 117–42. New York: Longman Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1992. Speaking in a Judicial Voice. NYU Law Review 67:1185–209.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1993. The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7:35–73.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 2008. Dred Scott and the Problem of Constitutional Evil. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1986. Law as Medium and Law as Institution. In Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State, ed. Teubner, Gunther, 203–20. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, A. Leon. 1980. In the Matter of Color: Race and the American Legal Process 1: The Colonial Period. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, A. Leon. 1998. Shades of Freedom: Racial Politics and Presumptions of the American Legal Process Race and the American Legal Process, Volume II. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1981. American Politics: The Promise of Disharmony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel. 1993. Judging Politics: The Elusive Quest for Judicial Review of Political Fairness. Texas Law Review 71:1643–1704.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservativism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. A Model, a Method and a Map: Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis. In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Lichbach, Mark and Zuckerman, Alan, 19–41. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1788a. The Particular Structure of the New Government and the Distribution of Power Among Its Different Parts. Federalist No. 47, February 1. http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed47.htm (accessed July 8, 2010).Google Scholar
Madison, James. 1788b. The Structure of the Government Must Furnish the Proper Checks and Balances between the Different Departments. Federalist No. 51, February 8. http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed51.htm (accessed July 8, 2010).Google Scholar
Maltz, Earl M. 2009. Slavery and the Supreme Court, 1825–1861. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Marwick, Arthur. 1998. The Sixties. New York: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Mason, Alpheus. 1959. The Supreme Court: Temple and Forum. Yale Review 48:524–40.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1992. The Supreme Court and Social Change: Reform Litigation on Trial. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4): 715–44.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 1996. Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being So Positive …). Law & Social Inquiry 21 (2): 457–82.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. 2006. Legal Mobilization and Social Reform Movements: Notes on Theory and Its Application. In Law and Social Movements, ed. McCann, M., 3–32. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep. 1983. Regulation and the Courts: The Case of the Clean Air Act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep. 1994. Between the Lines: Interpreting Welfare Rights. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Melnick, R. Shep. 2010. Silverstein's Allure. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 35 (4): 1053–63.Google Scholar
Miller, Mark, and Barnes, Jeb, eds. 2004. Making Policy, Making Law: An Interbranch Perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de. 1989. The Spirit of the Laws. Ed. Cohler, Anne. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murakawa, Naomi. 2010. Law's Strange Allure: The Power of Legal Lore beyond the Law‐Politics Divide. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 35 (4): 1065–76.Google Scholar
Neustadt, Richard E. 1976. Presidential Power: The Politics of Leadership with Reflections on Johnson and Nixon. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Pertschuk, Michael. 2001. Smoke in Their Eyes: Lessons in Movement Leadership from the Tobacco Wars. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Reich, Robert. 1999. Regulation Is Out, Litigation Is In. USA Today, February 11, A15.Google Scholar
Richards, Mark, and Kritzer, Herbert. 2002. Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making. American Political Science Review 96:305–20.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, Kermit. 2006. The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1992. The Supreme Court and Social Change: Hollow Hopes and Other Aspirations. Symposium: Law & Social Inquiry 17 (4): 761–78.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. 1991]. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sabin, Arthur. 1999. In Calmer Times: The Supreme Court and Red Monday. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schoenbrod, David. 1993. Power without Responsibility: How Congress Abuses the People through Delegation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, David, ed. 1998. Leveraging the Law: Using Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals, and Political Trials. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 1997. Imbalance of Powers: Constitutional Interpretation and the Making of American Foreign Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 2009. Law's Allure: How Law Shapes, Constrains, Saves, and Kills Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda. 2003. Diminished Democracy. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Stone Sweet, Alec. 2000. Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2006. Radicals in Robes: Why Right‐Wing Courts Are Wrong for America. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1969. Democracy in America. Trans. George Lawrence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Warren, Earl. 1977. The Memoirs of Earl Warren. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2007. The Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The President, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).Google Scholar
Brown v. Board of Education 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976).Google Scholar
Citizens United v. FEC, 558 U.S. 50 (2010).Google Scholar
Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428 (2000).Google Scholar
Employment Division of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).Google Scholar
Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, 379 U.S. 241 (1964).Google Scholar
Katzenbach v. McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964).Google Scholar
Kelo v. City of New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005).Google Scholar
Lorillard Tobacco v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001).Google Scholar
Marbury v. Madison 5 U.S. 137 (1803).Google Scholar
National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976).Google Scholar
Nixon v. Shrink Missouri, 528 U.S. 377 (2000).Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992).Google Scholar
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).Google Scholar
United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).Google Scholar
United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598 (2000).Google Scholar
United States v. Philip Morris, 449 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006).Google Scholar
West Virginia v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943).Google Scholar
Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. Sawyer 343 U.S. 579 (1952).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe, Dec. 16, 2004, 2004 O.J. (C 310). http://eur‐lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:310:SOM:en:HTML (accessed May 5, 2010).Google Scholar
War Powers Resolution of 1973, Public Law No. 93‐148 (Nov. 7, 1973).Google Scholar