Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-27gpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T09:19:53.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

From Remonstrance to Impeachment: A Curious Case of “Confucian Constitutionalism” in South Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2019

Abstract

In his path-breaking essay that investigates the rise of judicial review in democratic Taiwan and South Korea, Tom Ginsburg presents the distinctive style of judicial review practiced by both countries in terms of “Confucian constitutionalism,” at the core of which is the practice of constitutional review as remonstrance. This Article examines whether the model of Confucian constitutionalism is still relevant in Korea, especially in light of the Constitutional Court’s recent decision to uphold the motion to impeach the president rather than merely offering remonstrance or warning. By associating the Court’s jurisprudence characterized by highly moralistic language and style of reasoning with Confucian constitutionalism, this Article presents Confucian constitutionalism as indirect constitutionalism, a mode of constitutionalism that aims to shape the polity’s constitutional identity in a way that achieves a meaningful congruence between liberal constitutional principles and the underlying public culture that defines the polity as a distinctive moral community.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, Benjamin R. The Conquest of Politics: Liberal Philosophy in Democratic Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel A., and Li, Chenyang (eds.). The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Richard. Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, Ariel L., and Sela, Tal. “How Proportional Is Proportionality?International Journal of Constitutional Law 13, no. 2 (2015): 530–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey.The Rights of the Guilty: Punishment and Political Legitimacy,” Political Theory 25, no. 2 (2007): 175–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bui, Ngoc Son. Confucian Constitutionalism in East Asia. New York: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Carberry, Charles M.The State Advisory Opinion in Perspective,” Fordham Law Review 44, no. 1 (1975): 81113.Google Scholar
Chae, Chin-weon. “Chŏngch’iŭi sapŏphwa hyŏngsangŭi ironjŏk chaengchŏm [Theoretical Discussions about the Phenomenon of Judicialization of Politics],” Pyŏnghwa yŏn’gu 19, no. 2 (2011): 257–94.Google Scholar
Chan, Joseph. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Cho, Hein.The Historical Origin of Civil Society in Korea,” Korea Journal 37, no. 2 (1997): 2441.Google Scholar
Chung, Chai-sik.Chŏng Tojŏn: ‘Architect’ of Yi Dynasty Government and Ideology.” In The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea. Edited by Theodore de Bary, Wm. and Haboush, JaHyun K., 5988. New York: Columbia University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Confucius. Analects. Translated by Slingerland, Edward. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2003.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan,” Law & Social Inquiry 27, no. 4 (2002): 763–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. “The Constitutional Court and the Judicialization of Korean Politics.” In New Courts in Asia. Edited by Andrew Harding and Penelope Nicholson, 145–57. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaibong.Family Versus the Individual: The Politics of Marriage Laws in Korea.” In Confucianism for the Modern World. Edited by Bell, Daniel A. and Hahm, Chaibong, 334–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark. “Confucian Constitutionalism.” SJD Dissertation, Harvard Law School, 2000.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark. “Negotiating Confucian Civility through Constitutional Discourse.” In The Politics of Affective Relations. Edited by Chaihark Hahm and Daniel A. Bell, 277308. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark. “Beyond ‘Law vs. Politics’ in Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from South Korea,” International Journal of Constitutional Law 10, no. 1 (2012): 634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark. “Conceptualizing Korean Constitutionalism: Foreign Transplant or Indigenous Tradition?” In Confucianism, Law, and Democracy in Contemporary Korea. Edited by Sungmoon Kim, 1755. London: Rowman and Littlefield International, 2015.Google Scholar
Hahm, Chaihark, and Kim, Sung Ho. “Constitutionalism in Trial in South Korea,” Journal of Democracy 16, no. 2 (2005): 2842.Google Scholar
Helgesen, Geir. Democracy and Authority in Korea: The Cultural Dimension in Korean Politics. Surrey: Curzon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Hutton, Eric L.Character, Situationism, and Early Confucian Thought,” Philosophical Studies 127, no. 1 (2006): 3758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanhoe, Philip J.Confucian Self Cultivation and Mengzi’s Notion of Extension.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Edited by Liu, Xiusheng and Ivanhoe, Philip J., 221–41. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002.Google Scholar
Jang, Dong-jin.Taehanmin’guk chehŏngwajŏnge natanan jayujuŭi [Liberalism in the Constitutional Debates for Founding the Republic of Korea],” Chŏngch’isasang yŏn’gu 11, no. 2 (2005): 6381.Google Scholar
Jiang, Qing. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China’s Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future. Translated by Ryden, Edmund. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Kang, Jung In.Chehŏnhŏnpŏpŭi chayujuŭi inyŏmchŏk sŏnkkyŏk [The First Constitution of Korea and Liberalism],” Chŏngch’isasang yŏn’gu 11, no. 2 (2005): 83105.Google Scholar
Kim, Jongcheol.Nomuhyŏndeat’ongryŏng t’anhaekshimp’ansakkŏnesŏ hŏnppŏpchaep’ansoŭi chuyononchie taehan pip’anchŏk kŏmto [A Critical Examination of the Key Claims by the Constitutional Court in the Case of the Impeachment of President Roh Mu Hyun],” Seyehŏnpŏpp yŏn’gu 9 (2004): 122.Google Scholar
Kim, Man-kwon.Ch’oilsangŭi chŏngch’iwa chŏngch’aeŭi chaegusŏng: 2016nyŏn ch’otppurŭn hyŏngmyŏngin’ga? [The Politics of Extraordinary and Constitutional Moment: 2016 Candlelight Protests in South Korea],” Simin’gwa segye 30 (2017): 2754.Google Scholar
Kim, Sangjun.The Genealogy of Confucian Moralpolitik and Its Implications for Modern Civil Society.” In Korean Society: Civil Society, Democracy and the State. Edited by Armstrong, Charles K., 5791. London: Routledge, 2002.Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. “Oakeshott and Confucian Constitutionalism.” In Michael Oakeshott’s Cold War Liberalism. Edited by Nardin, Terry, 153–70. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.Google Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. Public Reason Confucianism: Democratic Perfectionism and Constitutionalism in East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. “Candlelight for Our Country’s Right Name: A Confucian Interpretation of South Korea’s Candlelight Revolution,” Religions 9, no. 11 (2018): 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Sungmoon. “Reversing the Stream: Virtue Politics and Moral Economy in Neo-Confucian Korea,” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Kim, Yong-ki, and Lim, Dong-hee. “Daet’ongnyŏng t’anhaek ch’otppulchipoeŭi kyoyukchŏk ŭimi [The Educational Implications of Candlelight Vigil Protests for President Impeachment],” Hang’uk k’ontenchŭhakhoe nonmunchip 17, no. 6 (2017): 311–18.Google Scholar
Kim, Young-soo.Tongasia kunsingongch’ich’eŭi iron’gwa hyŏnsil [The Ideal and Reality of the Co-governance between the King and the Ministers in East Asia],” Tongyangchŏngch’isasangsa 7, no. 2 (2008): 2958.Google Scholar
Kramer, Larry D. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lee, Youngjae.Law, Politics, and Impeachment: The Impeachment of Roh Moo-hyun from a Comparative Constitutional Perspective,” American Journal of Comparative Law 53, no. 2 (2005): 403–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomasky, Loren E.Classical Liberalism and Civil Society.” In Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society. Edited by Chambers, Simone and Kymlicka, Will, 50–67. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mencius. Mencius. Translated by Bloom, Irene. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Metzger, Thomas A.The Western Concept of Civil Society in the Context of Chinese History.” In Civil Society: History and Possibilities. Edited by Kaviraj, Sudipta and Khilnani, Sunil, 204–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Mo, Jongryn, “The Challenge of Accountability: Implications of the Censorate.” In Confucianism for the Modern World. Edited by Bell, Daniel A. and Hahm, Chaibong, 5468. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, Michael E. Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking, and Deliberation. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Na, Chong-sŏk, Taedongminju yuhakgwa yishipilsegi sirak: Han’gukminjujuŭiironŭi chaejŏngnip [Democratic Confucianism of the Grand Union and the 21st-Century Practical Learning: A Reformulation of Korean Democratic Theory]. Seoul: Tosŏch’ulp’an pi, 2017.Google Scholar
Nosco, Peter.Confucian Perspectives on Civil Society and Government.” In Civil Society and Government. Edited by Rosenblum, Nancy L. and Post, Robert C., 334–59. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Oh, Seung-yong. “Han’guk minjujuŭiŭi wigiwa pŏbŭi chibae [The Crisis of Democracy and the Rule of Law in Korea],” Minjujuŭiwa inkkŏn 10, no. 3 (2010): 163–95.Google Scholar
Pak, Un-jong.Chŏngch’iŭi sabŏpwawa minjujuŭi [Judicialization of Politics and Democracy],” Sŏuldaehak pŏphak 51, no. 1 (2010): 126.Google Scholar
Park, Myung-lim.Hŏnppŏp, hŏnppŏpchuŭi, kŭrigo han’guk minjujuŭi [Constitution, Constitutionalism, and Korean Democracy],” Han’gukchŏngch’ihakhoebo 39, no. 1 (2004): 253–76.Google Scholar
Peng, Chengyi.Traditional Confucian Constitutionalism: Current Explorations and Prospects,” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 8, no. 1 (2013): 7698.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Slote, Michael. Ethics of Care and Empathy. London: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Tu, Wei-Ming.The Search for Roots in Industrial East Asia: The Case of the Confucian Revival.” In Fundamentalisms Observed. Edited by Marry, Martin E. and Appleby, R. Scott, 740–81. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael.Philosophy and Democracy,” Political Theory 9, no. 3 (1981): 370–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Xunzi. Xunzi. Translated by Hutton, Eric L.. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Hyunah.Vision of Postcolonial Feminist Jurisprudence in Korea: Seen from the ‘Family-Head System’ in Family Law.” Journal of Korean Law 5(2006): 1228.Google Scholar
Yi, Hwang-chik. Kunjadrŭi heangjin: Yugyoinŭi kŏn’gukundonggwa minjuhwaundong [The March of the Confucian Gentlemen: The Founding and Democratic Movement of the Confucians]. Seoul: Akanet, 2017.Google Scholar
Yi, Young-jae.Chŏngch’iŭi sabŏphwa, minjujuŭiŭi wigiin’ga? [Judicialization of Politics, A Crisis of Democracy?],” Pyŏnghwa yŏn’gu 20, no. 1 (2012): 71102.Google Scholar
Yoon, Dae-Kyu. Law and Democracy in South Korea: Democratic Development since 1987. Seoul: Kyungnam University Press, 2010.Google Scholar