Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:28:46.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutional Politics and Constitutional Theory: A Misunderstood and Neglected Relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Mark A. Graber
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , Spring 2002 , pp. 309 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsterdam, Anthony G. 1974. Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment. Minnesota Law Review 58: 349–477.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. M., and Levinson, Sanford. 1999. Interpreting Law and Music: Performance Notes on “The Banjo Serenader” and “The Lying Crowd of Jews. Cardozo Law Review 20: 1513–72.Google Scholar
Battle for the Bench. 2000. Economist, 7 June.Google Scholar
Beck, Paul Allen. 1976. Critical Elections and the Supreme Court: Putting the Cart after the Horse. American Political Science Review 70: 930–32.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1955. The Original Understanding and the Segregation Decision. Harvard Law Review 69: 1–65.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Black, Charles L. Jr. 1967. Foreword: “State Action,” Equal Protection, and California's Proposition 14. Harvard Law Review 81: 69–109.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1971. Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems. Indiana Law Journal 47: 1–35.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1990. The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1996. Slouching towards Gomorrah: Modem Liberalism and American Decline. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Brandon, Mark E. 1998. Free in the World: American Slavery and Constitutional Failure. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Canon, Bradley C., and Sidney Ulmer, S. 1976. The Supreme Court and Critical Elections: A Dissent. American Political Science Review 70: 1215–18.Google Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. The Supreme Court and National Policy Making. American Political Science Review 70: 50–63.Google Scholar
Congressional Globe. 1865. 38th Cong. 2nd sess.Google Scholar
Cox, Archibald. 1966. Foreword: Constitutional Adjudication and the Promotion of Human Rights. Harvard Law Review 80: 91–122.Google Scholar
Cross, Frank B. 1997. Political Science and the New Legal Realism: A Case of Unfortunate Interdisciplinary Ignorance. Northwestern University Law Review 92: 251–326.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Journal of Public Law 6: 279–95.Google Scholar
Danelski, David J. 1964. A Supreme Court Justice Is Appointed. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal. 1996. Shaping Constitutional Values: Elected Government, the Supreme Court, and the Abortion Debate. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Duxbury, Neil. 1993. Faith in Reason: The Process Tradition in American Jurisprudence. Cardozo Law Review 15: 601–705.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1996. Freedom's Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen L. 2001. The Constitutional Theory of the Commercial Republic. Fordham Law Review 69: 1933–68.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1970. Legislative and Administrative Motivation in Constitutional Law. Yak Law Journal 79: 1205–1341.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1973. The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade. Yale Law Journal 82: 920–49.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Thomas I. 1963. Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment. Yale Law Journal 72: 877–956.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 1991. Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game. California Law Review 79: 613–84.Google Scholar
Fallen, Richard H. Jr. 2001. Implementing the Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: fnterpretation as Political Process. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles, and Kosaki, Liane C. 1989. Republican Schoolmaster: The U. S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion. American Political Science Review 83: 751–71.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 1993. Dialogue and Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review 91: 577–682.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 1998. The History of the Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part One: The Road to Judicial Supremacy. New York University Law Review 73: 333–433.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1975. The Supreme Court and Critical Elections. American Political Science Review 69: 795–811.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1976a. To the Editor. American Political Science Review 70: 932.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1976b. Funston Reply to Canon and Ulmer. American Political Science Review 70: 1218–21.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1977. Constitutional Counterrevolution.7 The Warren Court and the Burger Court: Judicial Policy making in Modern America. Cambridge, Mass.: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Funston, Richard. 1978. A Vital National Seminar: The Supreme Court in American Political Life. Palo Alto, Calif.: Mayfield.Google Scholar
Garrow, David J. 1994. Liberty and Sexuality: The Right to Privacy and the Making of Roe v. Wade. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 2001. What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making. Law and Social Inquiry 26: 465–98.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark A. 1991. Transforming Free Speech: The Ambiguous Legacy of Civil Libertarianism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 1993. The Non-Majoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary. Studies in American Political Development 7: 35–73.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 1995. The Passive-Aggressive Virtues: Cohens v. Virginia and the Problematic Establishment of Judicial Power. Constitutional Commentary 12: 67–92.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 1996. Rethinking Abortion: Equal Choke, the Constitution, and Reproductive Politics. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Graber, Mark. 2000. The Law Professor as Populist. University of Richmond Law Review 34: 373–413.Google Scholar
Greenawalt, Kent. 1978. The Enduring Significance of Neutral Principles. Columbia Law Review 78: 982–1021.Google Scholar
Grey, Thomas C. 1975. Do We Have an Unwritten Constitution Stanford Law Review 27: 703–18.Google Scholar
Griffin, Stephen M. 1996. American Constitutionalism: From Theory to Politics. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, Gerald. 1972. Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection. Harvard Law Review 86: 1.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1961. The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Hart, Henry M. Jr. 1959. Foreword: The Time Chart of the Justices. Harvard Law Review 73: 84–125.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion. American Political Science Review 94: 89–100.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, D. C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Howard, A. E. Dick. 2000. The Activists on the Bench. Washington Post, Book World, 6 November.Google Scholar
Howard, Woodford J. 1968. On the Fluidity of Judicial Choice. American Political Science Review 62: 43–56.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1986. Legal Realism at Yale, 1927-1960. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kalman, Laura. 1996. The Strange Career of Legal Liberalism. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. Louis White Beck. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational.Google Scholar
Karst, Kenneth L. 2001. Book Review. American Historical Review 106: 1021.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas. Forthcoming. The Supreme Court and Modern Constitutional Conservatism, 1937-2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication. Harvard Law Review 89: 1685–1778.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael J. 1996. Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions. Virginia Law Review 82: 1–67.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 1996. Antidiscrimination Law and Social Equality. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Krislov, Samuel. 1965. The Supreme Court in the Political Process. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan E. 1990. The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme Court Decision Making. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarus, Edward. 2000. What Warren Wrought. Los Angeles Times Book Review, 11 June.Google Scholar
Leff, Mark H. 1995. Revisioning U. S. Political History. American Historical Review 100: 829–53.Google Scholar
Lefkowitz, Jay P. 2000. If the Legislature Won't Do It, We Will. Wall Street Journal, 20 March, 30.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. 1988. Constitutional Faith. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, and Balkin, J. M. 1991. Law, Music, and Other Performing Arts. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 139: 1597–1658.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The Erambk Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. New York: Oceana Publications.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas. 1987. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Wallace. 1985. Supreme Court Statecraft: The Rule of Law and Men. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1967. Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of Just Compensation Law. Harvard Law Review 80: 1665.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1969. Foreword: On Protecting the Poor through the Fourteenth Amendment. Harvard Law Review 83: 7–59.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank. 1973. In Pursuit of Constitutional Welfare Rights: One View of Rawls's Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121: 962–1019.Google Scholar
Michelman, Frank I. 1999. Brennan and Democracy. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S. 1993. The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions. American Political Science Review 87: 87–101.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1961. In His Own Image: Mr. Chief Justice Taft and Supreme Court Appointments. In 1961: The Supreme Court Review, ed. Kurland, Philip B. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1962. Congress and the Court: A Case Study in American Political Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, David M. 1986. Storm Center: The Supreme Court in American Politics. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Overby, L. Marvin, Henschen, Beth M., Walsh, Michael H., and Strauss, Julie. 1992. Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas. American Political Science Review 86: 997–1003.Google Scholar
Peretti, Terri Jennings. 1999. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, H. W. Jr. 1991. Deciding to Decide: Agenda Setting in the United States Supreme Court. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1982. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights: An Inquiry into the Legitimacy of Constitutional Policymaking by the Judiciary. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1988. Morality, Politics, and Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1991. Love and Power: The Role of Religion and Morality in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, Michael J. 1994- The Constitution in the Courts: Law or Politics? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Posner, Richard A. 1999. Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. 2001. Frontiers of Legal Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Pound, Roscoe. 1954. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rae, Nicol C. 1989. The Decline and Fall of the Liberal Republicans: From 1952 to the Present. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosen, Jeffrey. 2000. The End of Deference. New Republic, 6 November, 39–45.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2000. Bringing Politics Back in. Northwestern University Law Review 95: 309–26.Google Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. 2001. Freedom and Time: A Theory of Constitutional Self Government. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scheiber, Harry N. 1981. American Constitutional History and the New Legal History: Complementary Themes in Two Modes. Journal of American History 68: 337–50.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1988. Legal Secrets: Equality and Efficiency in the Common Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999. Supreme Court Deference to Congress: An Examination of the Marksist Model. In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Seidman, Louis Michael. 1992. Brown and Miranda. California Law Review 80: 673–753.Google Scholar
Sen, Amartya. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Fred R. 1985. The Most-Cited Law Review Articles. California Law Review 73: 1540–54.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 1983. Fathers and Sons: The Court, The Commentators, and the Search for Values. In The Burger Court: The Counter-Revolution That Wasn't, ed. Blasi, Vincent. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Fred R. 1991. Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Silver, Daniel J. 2000. Our Robed Masters: It All Began with the Warren Court. Weekly Standard, 31 July 31, 36.Google Scholar
Spaeth, Harold J., and Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999. Majority Rule or Minority Witt: Adherence to Precedent on the U. S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stearns, Maxwell L. 2000. Constitutional Process: A Social Choice Analysis of Supreme Court Decision Making. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Richard B. 1975. The Reformation of American Administrative Law. Harvard Law Review 88: 1667–1813.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1990. After the Rights Revolution: Recanceiving the Regulatory State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1993. The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1996. Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1997. Free Markets and Social Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism on the Supreme Court. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R. 2001. Republic. com. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, C, Neal, . 1995. Why the Expansion of Judicial Power? In The Global Expansion of Judicial Power, ed. Neal Tate, C. and Vallinder, Torbjorn. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1977. Unraveling National League of Cities: The New Federalism and Affirmative Rights to Essential Government Services. Harvard Law Review 90: 1065–1104.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H. 1985. Constitutional Choices. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence H., and Dorf, Michael C. 1991. On Reading the Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1988. Red, White, and Blue: A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2000. The Politics of Constitutional Law. Texas Law Review 79: 163–87.Google Scholar
Urofsky, Mel. 2001. Revivifying Political Science: Lucas A. Powe, Jr., on the Warren Court. Journal of Supreme Court History 26: 89–94.Google Scholar
Vose, Clement E. 1972. Constitutional Change: Amendment Politics and Supreme Court Litigation Since 1970. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law. Harvard Law Review 73: 1–35.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Herbert. 1965. The Courts and the Constitution. Columbia Law Review 65: 1001–14.Google Scholar
Wellington, Harry H. 1973. Common Law Rules and Constitutional Double Standards: Some Notes on Adjudication. Yale Law Journal 83: 221–311.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 1994. Progressive Constitutionalism; Reconstructing the Fourteenth Amendment. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith. 2000. The Politics of the Supreme Court. Policy Review 102 (Aug./Sept.): 63–70.Google Scholar