Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:08:51.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confucian Constitutionalism? The Emergence of Constitutional Review in Korea and Taiwan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This paper documents the recent emergence of constitutional review of legislative and administrative action in Korea and Taiwan, two East Asian countries seen to be historically resistant to notions of judicial activism and constitutional constraint. It argues that the ability to draw from foreign legal traditions, especially those of the United States and Germany, empowered judges in these countries and therefore helped to alter the structure of public law away from executive-centered approaches of the past. This is consistent with viewing judicial review as essentially a foreign transplant. Nevertheless, the institution of judicial review has some compatibilities with Confucian legal tradition, a point that has implications for how we think about institutional transfers across borders. By constructing a locally legitimate account of what is undeniably a modern institution of foreign origin, the paper argues that constitutional constraint should not be viewed as an imposition of Western norms, but as a more complex process of adaptation and institutional transformation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, Richard. 1982. Law as Lag: Inertia as a Social Theory of Law. Michigan Law Review 80: 785809.Google Scholar
Ahn, Kyong Whan. 1994. The Growth of the Bar and the Changes in the Lawyer's Role: Korea's Dilemma. In Law and Technology in the Pacific Community, ed. Philip, S. C. Boulder, Lewis, Colo: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Ahn, Kyong Whan. 1998. The Influence of American Constitutionalism on South Korea. Southern Illinois Law Journal 22: 71115.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, Janet E. 1996. Categories and Culture: On the “Rectification of Names” in Comparative Law. Cornell Law Review 82: 1942.Google Scholar
Allee, Mark A. 1994. Law and Local Society in Late Imperial China. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, William Somers. 1997. Reducing Malapportionment in Japan's Electoral Districts: The Supreme Court Must Act. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6: 169–98.Google Scholar
Bauer, Joanne, and Bell, Daniel. 1999. The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Lawrence Ward. 1979. Constitutionalism in Asia: Asian Views of American Influence. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Beresford, Melanie. 1995. Review of Vietnam and the Rule of Law, by Carlyle Thayer and David Marr. Journal of Asian Studies 54: 910–12.Google Scholar
Benbardt, Kathryn, and Huang, Philip C. C. 1994. Civil Law in Qing and Republican China, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bodde, Derk, and Morris, Clarence. 1967. Law in Imperial China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, Mauro. 1989. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Johannes. 1999. Judicial Independence: Controversies on the Constitutional Jurisdiction of the Court of Final Appeal of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. International Lawyer 33: 1015–23.Google Scholar
Chang, Wen-Chen. 2001. Transition to Democracy, Constitutionalism and Judicial Activism. S. J. D. diss., Yale University.Google Scholar
Chao, Linda, and Myers, Ramon. 1998. The First Chinese Democracy: Political Life in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Chiu, Hungdah. 1993. Constitutional Development and Reform in the Republic of China on Taiwan. Issues and Studies 29: 138.Google Scholar
Cho, Kuk. 1997. Tension between the National Security Law and Constitutionalism in South Korea: Security for What Boston University International Law Journal 15: 125–74.Google Scholar
Choi, Dae-Kwon. 1980. Development of Law and Legal Institutions in Korea. In Duck Chun, Bong, Shaw, William, and Dae-Kwon, Choi, Traditional Korean Legal Attitudes. Korea Research Monograph no. 2. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Clark, Donald, ed. 1988. The Kwangju Uprising: Shadows over the Regime in South Korea. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Cooney, Sean. 1996. The New Taiwan and Its Old Labour Law: Authoritarian Legislation in a Democratised Society. Comparative Labor Law Journal 18: 161.Google Scholar
Cooney, Sean. 1997. Taiwan's Emerging Liberal Democracy and the New Constitutional Review. In Asian Laws through Australian Eyes, ed. Taylor, Veronica. Sydney: LBC Publishing.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. 1998a The Price of Rights: Constitutionalism and East Asian Economic Development. Hunam Rights Quarterly 20: 303–37.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael. 1998b. Constitutionalism and Political Culture: The Debate over Human Rights and Asian Values. Harvard Human Rights Law Journal 11: 109–47.Google Scholar
De Bary, William Theodore, and Kim Haboush, JaHyun. 1985. The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
De Bary, William Theodore, and Weiming, Tu. 1998. Confucianism and Human Rights. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ewald, William. 1995. Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants. American Journal of Comparative Law 43: 489510.Google Scholar
Feldman, Eric. 2000. The Ritual of Rights in Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis. 2001. Confucianism and Democracy. In The Global Divergence of Democracy, ed. Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Gewirtz, Paul. 2001. Approaches to Constitutional Interpretation: Comparative Constitutionalism and Chinese Characteristics. Hong Kong Law Journal 31: 200223.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2000. Does Law Matter for Economic Development? Evidence from East Asia. Law and Society Review 34: 829–56.Google Scholar
Grand Justices and Constitutional Court of the Republic of China. 1995. Taipei: Judicial Yuan.Google Scholar
Hahm, Pyong-choon. 1986. Korean Jurisprudence, Politics and Culture. Seoul: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Gary, and Kao, Cheng-shu. 1986. Max Weber and the Analysis of Asian Industrialization. University California–Davis, Research Program in East Asian Culture and Development, working paper no. 2.Google Scholar
Huang, Philip C. C. 1996. Civil Justice in China: Representation and Practice in the Qing. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1997. After Twenty Years: The Future of the Third Wave. Journal of Democracy 8: 312.Google Scholar
Jones, Carol. 1994. Capitalism, Globalization and the Rule of Law: An Alternative Trajectory of Legal Change in China. Social and Legal Studies 3: 195221.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 1991. Adversarial Legalism in American Government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 10: 375406.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2001. Adversarial Legalism: The American Way of Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, and Axelrad, Lee. 2000. Regulatory Encounters. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small States in World Markets. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keith, Ronald. 1994. China's Struggle for the Rule of Law. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Kenney, Sally J., Reisinger, William M., and Reitz, John C. 1999. Constitutional Dialogues in Comparative Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
King, Ambrose. 1996. State Confucianism and Its Transformation in Taiwan. In Tu 1996.Google Scholar
Klug, Heinz. 2000. Constituting Democracy: Law, Globalism and South Africa's Political Reconstruction. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kommers, Donald. 1997. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. 2d ed. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ma, Herbert Han-pao. 1998. The Rule of Law in a Contemporary Confucian Society: A Reinterpretation. Paper presented at Harvard Law School's East Asian Legal Studies Program.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew J. 1985. Chinese Democracy. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Palais, James B. 1996. Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hyongwon and the Late Choson Dynasty. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Petchsiri, Apirat. 1987. The Eastern Importation of Western Criminal Law. Littleton, Colo.: Fred B. Rothman.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucien. 1985. Asian Power and Politics. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Sang, Hyun Song. 1983. Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Korea. Seoul: Kyung Mun Sa Publishing.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin. 1987. The Primary of Political Order in East Asian Societies: Some Preliminary Generalizations. In Foundations and Limits of State Power in China, ed. Schram, Stuart. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Seow, Francis T. 1990. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Rights in Singapore Have Been Eroded. Index On Censorship 19: 38.Google Scholar
Seow, Francis T. 1995. A Free and Flippant Media. Media Studies Journal 9: 7781.Google Scholar
Shaw, William. 1981. Legal Norms in a Confucian State. Korea Research Monograph no. 5. Berkeley, Calif.: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Stone, Alec. 1992. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, Neal, and Vallinder, Thorsten. 1995. The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Teik, Khoo Boo. 1999. Between Law and Politics: The Malaysian Judiciary since Independence. In Law Capitalism and Power in Asia, ed. Jayasuriya, Kanishka. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trubek, David. 1996. Law and Development: Then and Now. American Society of International Law Proceedings 90: 223–28.Google Scholar
Tu, Wei-ming, ed. 1996. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto. 1976. Law In Modern Society: Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Volcansek, Mary. 1994. Political Power and Judicial Review in Italy. Comparative Political Studies 26: 492509.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. 1991. Legal Origins and Legal Change. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Alan. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. 2d ed. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1951. The Religion of China, trans. and ed. Gerth, Hans H. Glencoe Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
West, James. 1997. Martial Lawlessness: The Legal Aftermath of Kwangju. Pacific Rim Law and Policy Journal 6: 85168.Google Scholar
West, James, and Yoon, Dae-Kyu. 1992. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea: Transforming the Jurisprudence of the Vortex. American Journal of Comparative Law 40: 73119.Google Scholar
Winn, Jane Kaufmann, and Yeh, Tang-chi. 1995. Advocating Democracy: The Role of Lawyers in Taiwan's Political Transformation. Law and Social Inquiry 20: 561–99.Google Scholar
Yang, Kun. 1993. Judicial Review and Social Change in the Korean Democratizing Process. American Journal of Comparative Law 41: 18.Google Scholar
Yong-chin, Su 1997. Summary of Interpretations by Council of Grand Justices. In Zhonghua minguo xing hsien wu shi nien (Fifty years of the ROC constitution). Taipei: National Assembly.Google Scholar