Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-ttsf8 Total loading time: 0.228 Render date: 2021-08-02T03:14:36.866Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Law versus Justice: From Adversarialism to Communitarianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this article. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayres, Ian, and John, Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Black, Donald. 1976. The Behavior of Law. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bonta, James, Jennifer, Rooney, and Wallace-Capretta, Suzanne. 1998. Restorative Justice: An Evaluation of the Restorative Resolutions Project. Ottawa: Solicitor General, Canada.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1982a. Enforced Self-Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control Michigan Law Review 80:1466–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1982b. The Limits of Economism in Controlling Harmful Corporate Conduct. Law and Society Review 16:481506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1984. Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1985. To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1989. Crime, Shame, and Reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1995a. Corporate Crime and Republican Criminological Praxis. In Frank, Pearce and Laureen, Snider, eds., Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1995b. Inequality and Republican Criminology. In John, Hagan and Ruth, Peterson, eds., Crime and Inequality. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1998. Institutionalizing Distrust, Enculturating Trust. In Valerie, Braithwaite and Margaret, Levi, eds., Trust and Governance. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2002a. Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty. Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 27: 4782.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2002b. Rewards and Regulation. Journal of Law and Society 29:1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Valerie, Braithwaite. 1995. The Politics of Legalism: Rules versus Standards in Nursing-Home Regulation. Social and Legal Studies 4:307–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Peter, Drahos. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Gilbert, Geis. 1982. On Theory and Action for Corporate Crime Control. Crime and Delinquency (April): 292314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Toni, Makkai. 1991. Testing an Expected Utility Model of Corporate Deterrence. Law and Society Review 28:740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Toni, Makkai. 1994. Trust and Compliance. Policing and Society 4:112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Philip, Pettit. 1990. Not Just Deserts: A Republican Theory of Criminal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Calavita, Kitty. 1983. The Demise of the Occupational Safety and Health. Administration: A Case Study in Symbolic Action. Social Problems 30:437–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinard, Marshall B., and Peter, C. Yeager. 1980. Corporate Crime. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. [1893] 1933. The Division of Labor in Society. Trans. George, Simpson. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.Google Scholar
Fisse, Brent, and John, Braithwaite. 1983. The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law and Society Review 9:95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David. 1990. Punishment and Modern Society: A Study in Social Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goleman, Daniel. 1995. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 1998. Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Hagan, John. 1994. Crime and Disrepute. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 1983. Bargain and Bluff: Compliance Strategy and Deterrence in the Enforcement of Regulation. Law and Policy Quarterly 5:3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Keith. 1984. Environment and Enforcement: Regulation and the Social Definition of Pollution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kram, Kathy E., Peter Yeager, C., and Gary, Reed. 1989. Decisions and Dilemmas: The Ethical Dimension in the Corporate Context. In James Post, E., ed., Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 11:2154. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Makkai, Tony, and John, Braithwaite. 1994. Reintegrative Shaming and Regulatory Compliance. Criminology 32:361–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhiber, Russell. 1988. Corporate Crime and Violence: Big Business Power and the Abuse of the Public Trust. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
Nader, Mark Green J. Ralph, and Joel, Seligman. 1976. Taming the Giant Corporations. New York: Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Nicholl, Caroline G. 1999. Community Policing, Community Justice, and Restorative Justice: Exploring the Links for the Delivery of a Balanced Approach to Public Safety. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Parker, Christine. 1999. Just Lawyers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, Gary E., and Cleary Yeager, Peter. 1996. Organizational Offending and Neoclassical Criminology: Challenging the Reach of a General Theory of Crime. Criminology 34:357382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Joseph V. 1994. Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety since Three Mile Island. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scull, Andrew T. 1984. Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant; A Radical View. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Sherman, Lawrence W., Heather, Strang, and Daniel, J. Woods. 2000. Recidivism Patterns in the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Canberra: Centre for Restorative Justice, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Shover, Donald Clelland A. Neal, and John, Lynxwiler. 1986. Enforcement or Negotiation: Constructing a Regulatory Bureaucracy. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Christopher D. 1975. Where the Law Ends: The Social Control of Corporate Behavior. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Szasz, Andrew. 1986. Corporations, Organized Crime, and the Disposal of Hazardous Waste: An Examination of the Making of a Criminogenic Regulatory Structure. Criminology 24:128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonry, Michael H. 1995. Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom. 1990. Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom, and Yuen, J. Huo. 2001. Trust and the Rule of Law: A Law-Abidingness Model of Social Control. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Yeager, Cleary Peter. 1991. The Limits of Law: The Public Regulation of Private Pollution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager, Cleary Peter. 1993. Industrial Water Pollution. In Michael, Tonry and Albert Reiss, J. Jr., eds., Beyond the Law: Crime in Complex Organizations. Vol. 18 of Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yeager, Peter Cleary. 1995a. Law, Crime, and Inequality: The Regulatory State. In John, Hagan and Ruth, Peterson D., eds., Crime and Inequality. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeager, Cleary Peter. 1995b. Management, Morality and Law: Organizational Forms and Ethical Deliberations. In Frank, Pearce and Laureen, Snider, eds., Corporate Crime: Contemporary Debates. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Yeager, Cleary Peter. 1999. Structural Bias in Regulatory Law Enforcement: The Case of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In Bridget, Hutter, ed., A Reader on Environmental Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Law versus Justice: From Adversarialism to Communitarianism
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Law versus Justice: From Adversarialism to Communitarianism
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Law versus Justice: From Adversarialism to Communitarianism
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *