Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 0.202 Render date: 2021-10-16T16:21:08.047Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Integrative Regulation: A Principle-Based Approach to Environmental Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018


This article builds on recent field research to articulate a principle-based approach to environmental regulatory design that is applicable to a wide variety of circumstances, irrespective of political and social particularities. At its core, this approach recognizes that an excessive reliance on “single-instrument” policies is misguided, because all instruments have strengths and weaknesses, and none is sufficiently flexible and resilient to successfully address all environmental problems in all contexts. A better strategy is to harness the strengths of individual mechanisms while compensating for their weaknesses by the use of additional instruments. That is, in the large majority of circumstances, a mix of regulatory instruments is required, tailored to specific policy goals. The article identifies a series of regulatory design principles that sequentially address the problems and opportunities arising from the application of multi-instrument mixes and engaging a variety of first-, second-, and third-party participants in the regulatory process. The importance of choosing inherently complementary instrument combinations is also highlighted, with practical guidance provided to policymakers. Although the focus of the article is on environmental regulation, the general principles articulated should also be applicable to other areas of social regulation.

Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1999 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Alm, Alvin L. 1992. A Need for New Approaches: Command and Control No Longer a Cure-All. EPA Journal, May/June, 6–11.Google Scholar
Anderson, Terry L., and Donald, R. Leal. 1992. Free Market versus Political Environmentalism. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 15:297310.Google Scholar
Aora, Seetna, and Timothy, N. Cason. 1995. An Experiment in Voluntary Regulation: Participation in EPA's 33/50 Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 28 (3): 271–86.Google Scholar
Atcheson, John. 1996. Can We Trust Veriflcation Environmental Forum, July/August, 16.Google Scholar
Ayres, Lan, and Braithwaite, John. 1992. Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bardach, Eugene, and Kagan, Robert. 1982. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Tempie University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Martin, and James, Peter. 1997. Environment-Related Management Accounting: Current Practice and Future Trends. Greener Management International 17:3252.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 1993. Responsive Regulation in Australia. In Business Regulation and Australia's Future, ed. Grabosky, Peter and Braithwaite, John. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Brown, Lester Russell, Flavin, Christopher, and Postel, Sandra. 1991. Saving the Planet: How to Shape an Environmentally Sustainable Global Economy. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Caincross, Frances. 1992. Costing the Earth: The Challenge for Governments, the Opportunities for Business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, David. 1996. Voluntary Codes: The Role of the Canadian State in a Privatised Regulatory Environment. A draft paper presented at the Voluntary Codes Symposium (organized by the Office of Consumer Affairs; Industry Canada; and Regulatory Affairs, Treasury Board), September, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Fiorino, David J. 1996. Towards a New System of Environmental Regulation: The Case for an Industry Sector Approach. Environmental Law 26 (2): 457–89.Google Scholar
Freeman, Paul K., and Kunreather, Howard. 1996. The Roles of Insurance and Well Specified Standards in Dealing with Environmental Risk. Risk Management and Decision Economics 17:513–30.Google Scholar
1997. Managing Environmental Risk Through Insurance. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Grabosky, Peter N. 1994. Green Markets: Environmental Regulation by the Private Sector. Law and Policy 16 (4): 419–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Inside the Pyramid: Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of Regulatory Systems. International Journal of Sociology of Law 25:195201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, Neil. 1994. Beyond Compliance: Management of Environmental Risk. In Environmental Outlook: Law and Policy, ed. Boer, Ben, Fowler, Robert, and Gunningham, Neil. Sydney: Australian Centre for Environmental Law and Federation Press.Google Scholar
1995. Environment, Self-Regulation, and the Chemical Industry: Assessing Responsible Care. Law and Policy 17 (1): 58109.Google Scholar
1996a. From Compliance to Best Practice in OHS: The Role of Specification, Performance and Systems-Based Standards. Australian Journal of Labour Law 9 (3): 221–46.Google Scholar
1996b. Codes of Practice: The Australasian Experience. [A report for the Treasury Board of Canada]. Ottawa: Department of Consumer Affairs.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, and Cornwall, Amanda. 1994. Legislating the Right to Know. Environmental and Planning Law Journal 11:274–88.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, and Grabosky, Peter. 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, and Rees, Joseph. 1997. Industry Self-Regulation. Law and Policy 19 (4): 393414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, Neil, and Michael, D. Young. 1997. Towards Optimal Environmental Policy: The Case of Biodiversity Conservation. Ecology Law Quarterly 24:243–98.Google Scholar
Guntram, Ulrich, and Winsemius, Pieter. 1992. Responding to the Environmental Challenge. Business Horizons March/April, 12.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. 1993. Towards a New Environmental Paradigm. Yale Law Journal 102:1719–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, John T. 1995. Pollution as News: Media and Stockmarket Reactions to the Capital Toxic Release Inventory Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 98103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobert, George. 1992. Pluralism by Design. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Commission, Industry. 1995. Work, Health and Safety: Inquiry into Occupational Health and Safety. Vol. 1, Report no. 47. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Michael. 1991. The Green Economy. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
1993. The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert 1994. Regulatory Enforcement. In Handbook of Regulation and Administrative Law, ed. Rosenbloom, D. and Schwartz, R. New York . Dekker.Google Scholar
Kuttner, Robert. 1997. Everything for Sale: The Virtues and Limits of Markets. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar
Landy, Marc Karnis. 1994. The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking the Wrong Questions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McAvoy, Paul W. 1977. OSHA Safety Regulation: Report of the Presidential Task Force. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Meadows, Donella H., Meadows, Dennis L., and Randers, Jorgen. 1992. Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse: Envisioning a Sustainable Future. Chelsea Green, Vt.: Post Mills.Google Scholar
Meidinger, Erol. 1996. Look Who's Making the Rules: The Roles of the Forest Stewardship Council and International Standards Organisation in Environmental Policy Making. Paper presented to Colloauium on Emerging Environmental Policy: Winners and Losers, 23 September, Oregon State University, Corvellis.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B. 1994. International Oil Pollution at Sea: Environmental Policy and Treaty Compliance. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Muir, William K. 1967. Under What Circumstances Can Law Bring about Attitude Change? In Law and Change in Modem America, ed. Grossman, J. B. and Grossman, M. H. Pacific Palisades, Calif.: Goodyear Publishing.Google Scholar
Opschoor, Johannes B., and Kerry, R. Turner. 1994. Economic Incentives and Environmental Policies: Principles and Practice. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1994 Meeting on Alternatives to Traditional Regulation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
1997. Regulatory Impact Analysis: Best Practices in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and the Treasury Board of Canada. 1994. Assessing Regulatory Alternatives. Ottawa: Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat.Google Scholar
Osborne, David E., and Gaebler, Ted. 1992. Reinventing Government. Reading, mass.: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael. 1991. America's Green Strategy. Scientific American, April, 168.Google Scholar
Porter, Michael E. and van der Linde, Claas. 1994. The Challenge of Going Green. Harvard Business Review, July/August, 3750.Google Scholar
1995. Green and Competitive. Harvard Business Review , September/October, 120–34.Google Scholar
Potter, Jim. 1993. Chemical Accident Prevention Regulation in California and New Jersey. Ecology Law Quarterly 20:755815.Google Scholar
Rappaport, Ann, and Margaret Fresher Flaherty. 1991. Multinational Corporation and the Environment. Boston: Center for Environmental Management, Tufts University.Google Scholar
Rees, Joseph V. 1994- Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety since Three Mile Island. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James. 1995. The Impact of Environmental and Occupational Health Regulation on Productivity Growth in U.S. Manufacturing. Yale Journal of Regulation 12:388434.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas. 1960. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sigler, Jay A., and Joseph, E. Murphy. 1989. Interactive Corporate Compliance: An Alternative to Regulatory Compulsion. New York: Quorom Books.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1992. Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. Bristol, England: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sparrow, Malcolm K. 1994. Imposing Duties: Government's Changing Approach to Compliance. Westport, Conn.: Praeger.Google Scholar
Swanson, Timothy. 1995. Review of Economic Incentives and Environmental Policies: Principles and Practice , ed. Opschoor, J. B. and Turner, R. K. Review of European Community and Environmental Law 4(1): 85.Google Scholar
Vogel, David. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Walley, Noah, and Whitehead, Bradley. 1994 Its Not Easy Being Green. Harvard Business Review , May/June, 4652.Google Scholar
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Integrative Regulation: A Principle-Based Approach to Environmental Policy
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Integrative Regulation: A Principle-Based Approach to Environmental Policy
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Integrative Regulation: A Principle-Based Approach to Environmental Policy
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *