Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-h2mp8 Total loading time: 0.204 Render date: 2021-08-05T06:09:25.274Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Getting Schooled: Legal Mobilization as an Educative Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

This article explores the role of formal education and specific legal knowledge in the process of legal mobilization. Using survey data and in-depth case narratives of workplace disputes in China, we highlight three major findings. First, and uncontroversially, higher levels of formal education are associated with greater propensity to use legal institutions and to find them more effective. Second, informally acquired labor law knowledge can substitute for formal education in bringing people to the legal system and improving their legal experiences. The Chinese state's propagation of legal knowledge has had positive effects on citizens' legal mobilization. Finally, while education and legal knowledge are factors that push people toward the legal system, actual dispute experience leads people away from it, especially among disputants without effective legal representation. The article concludes that the Chinese state's encouragement of individualized legal mobilization produces contradictory outcomes—encouraging citizens to use formal legal institutions, imbuing them with new knowledge and rights awareness, but also breeding disdain for the law in practice.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, Eric. 1996. Management Fashion. Academy of Management Review 21 (1): 254–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamson, Eric, and Fairchild, Gregory. 1999. Management Fashion: Lifecycles, Triggers, and Collective Learning Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (4): 708–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albiston, Catherine R. 2005. Bargaining in the Shadow of Social Institutions: Competing Discourses and Social Change in Workplace Mobilization of Civil Rights. Law & Society Review 39 (1): 1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, Yuen Yuen, and Jia, Nan. 2014. Perverse Complementarity: Political Connections and the Use of Courts Among Private Firms in China. Journal of Politics 76 (02): 318–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benesh, Sara C. 2006. Understanding Public Confidence in American Courts. Journal of Politics 68 (3): 697707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Lehman Schlozman, Kay. 1995. Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bumiller, Kristin. 1988. The Civil Rights Society: The Social Construction of Victims. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., and Verba, S. 2009. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burstein, Paul. 1991. Legal Mobilization as a Social Movement Tactic: The Struggle for Equal Employment Opportunity. American Journal of Sociology 96 (5): 1201–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Fang, and Wang, Meiyan. 2012. Labour Market Changes, Labour Disputes and Social Cohesion in China. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/labour-market-changes-labour-disputes-and-social-cohesion-in-china_5k9h5×9c8dwc-en (accessed April 29, 2016).Google Scholar
Chan, Kam Wing. 2010. The Household Registration System and Migrant Labor in China: Notes on a Debate. Population and Development Review 36 (2): 357–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, Kam Wing, and Buckingham, Will. 2008. Is China Abolishing the Hukou System? China Quarterly 195.Google Scholar
Cheng, Joseph Y. S., Ngok, Kinglun, and Zhuang, Wenjia. 2010. The Survival and Development Space for China's Labor NGOs: Informal Politics and Its Uncertainty. Asian Survey 50 (6): 10821106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, Donald C. 2009. Private Attorney‐General in China: Potential and Pitfalls. GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper 2014–33: 241–55.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. 2004. Rivers of Law and Contested Terrain: A Law and Society Approach to Economic Rationality. Law & Society Review 38 (2): 181–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., and Lande, John. 1993. Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace. Law & Society Review 27 (3): 497534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Language and Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Exner, Mechthild. 1995. The Convergence of Ideology and the Law: The Functions of the Legal Education Campaign in Building a Chinese Legal System. Issues and Studies August:68–102.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., and Sarat, Austin. 1980. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …. Law & Society Review 15 (3/4): 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Mary. Forthcoming. Authoritarian Legality: Law, Workers, and the State in China. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. 1974. Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change. Law & Society Review 9 (1): 95–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, M. 2006. Mobilizing the Law in China: “Informed Disenchantment” and the Development of Legal Consciousness. Law & Society Review 40 (4): 783816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, M., Giles, J., Park, A., and Wang, M. 2014. China's 2008 Labor Contract Law: Implementation and Implications for China's Workers. Human Relations February.Google Scholar
Givens, John. 2013. Suing Dragons? Taking the Chinese State to Court. Oxford: Oxford University.Google Scholar
Gleeson, Shannon. 2009. From Rights to Claims: The Role of Civil Society in Making Rights Real for Vulnerable Workers. Law & Society Review 43 (3): 669700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2012. The Puzzling Non‐Consequences of Societal Distrust of Courts: Explaining the Use of Russian Courts. Cornell International Law Journal 45:517–67.Google Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2013. Too Much of a Good Thing? Assessing Access to Civil Justice in Russia. Slavic Review 72 (4): 802–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. 1997. Political Participation in the Chinese Countryside. American Political Science Review 91 (2): 361–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuruvilla, Sarosh, Ching, Kwan Lee, and Gallagher, Mary Elizabeth, eds. 2011. From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China. Frank W. Pierce Memorial Lectureship and Conference Series 14. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ching Kwan. 2007. Against the Law: Labor Protests in China's Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McCammon, Holly J. 2001. Labor's Legal Mobilization Why and When Do Workers File Unfair Labor Practices? Work and Occupations 28 (2): 143–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Language and Legal Discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McCubbins, Mathew D., and Schwartz, Thomas. 1984. Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols Versus Fire Alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2007. Climbing the Dispute Pagoda: Grievances and Appeals to the Official Justice System in Rural China. American Sociological Review 72 (3): 459–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2008. Justice from Above or Below? Popular Strategies for Resolving Grievances in Rural China. China Quarterly 193:4364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, and Read, Benjamin. 2010. Public Attitudes Toward Official Justice in Beijing and Rural China. In Chinese Justice: Civil Dispute Resolution in Contemporary China. New York/London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew J. 2003. Authoritarian Resilience. Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., Berrey, Ellen C., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2008. Divergent Paths: Conflicting Conceptions of Employment Discrimination in Law and the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 4 (1): 103–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, K. J., and Li, L. 2006. Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randal, and He, Xin. 2009. Dispute Resolution in China: Patterns, Causes and Prognosis. East Asia Law Review 4 (1):1–62.Google Scholar
Pei, Minxin. 1997. Citizens v. Mandarins: Administrative Litigation in China. China Quarterly 152: 832–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relis, Tamara. 2002. Civil Litigation from Litigants' Perspectives: What We Know and What We Don't Know About the Litigation Experience of Individual Litigants. Studies in Law, Politics, and Society 25:151212.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, Tianjian. 1997. Political Participation in Beijing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. 2005. After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 1 (1): 323–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spires, Anthony J. 2011. Contingent Symbiosis and Civil Society in an Authoritarian State: Understanding the Survival of China's Grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology 117 (1): 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. Cambridge Studies in Law and Society. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockmann, D., and Gallagher, M. E. 2011. Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China. Comparative Political Studies 44 (4): 436–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Yang, and He, Xin. 2010. Street as Courtroom: State Accommodation of Labor Protest in South China. Law & Society Review 44 (1): 157–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, W. 2005. Public Opinion and Political Change in China. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tang, W. 2009. Rule of Law and Dispute Resolution in China: Evidence from Survey Data. China Review 9 (1): 7396.Google Scholar
Tang, W., and Yang, Qing. 2008. The Chinese Urban Caste System in Transition. China Quarterly 196: 759–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troyer, R. J., Clark, J. P., and Rojek, D. G. 1989. Social Control in the People's Republic of China. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
World Justice Project. 2014. The World Justice Project: Rule of Law Index 2014. Washington, DC: World Justice Project.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. 2013. Labor Non‐Governmental Organizations in China: Mobilizing Rural Migrant Workers. Journal of Industrial Relations 55 (2): 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, G., and Calhoun, C. 2007. Media, Civil Society, and the Rise of a Green Public Sphere in China. China Information 21 (2): 211–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemans, Frances Kahn. 1983. Legal Mobilization: The Neglected Role of the Law in the Political System. American Political Science Review 77 (3): 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, David. 2003. To the Courts or to the Barricades: Can New Political Institutions Manage Rural Conflict? In Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance, 113–35. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
#20013;#21326;#20154;#27665;#20849;#21644;#22269;#21171;#21160;#21512;#21516;#27861;#65288;#20462;#25913;#65289;#65288;Labor Contract Law of the P.R. China, Revised) (by the Standing Committee of the Nat'l People's Cong., December 28, 2012, Effective July 1, 2013), n.d. http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2012-12/28/content_2305571.htm.Google Scholar
#20013;#21326;#20154;#27665;#20849;#21644;#22269;#21171;#21160;#27861; #65288;Labor Law of P.R. China) (promulgated by the Standing Committee of the Nat'l People's Cong., July 5, 1994, Effective January 1, 1995), n.d. http://www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-05/25/content_905.htm.Google Scholar
#20013;#21326;#20154;#27665;#20849;#21644;#22269;#21171;#21160;#20105;#35758;#35843;#35299;#20210;#35009;#27861;#27880;#37322;#26412; = Law of the People's Republic of China on Mediation and Arbitration of Labor Disputes. 2008. #21271;#20140;#24066;: #27861;#24459;#20986;#29256;#31038;.Google Scholar
#20013;#21326;#20154;#27665;#20849;#21644;#22269;#31038;#20250;#20445;#38505;#27861; (Social Insurance Law of P.R. China) (promulgated by the Standing Comm. of Nat'l People's Cong., Oct. 28, 2010, Effective July 1, 2011), n.d. http://www.gov.cn/flfg/2010-10/28/content_1732964.htm.Google Scholar
9
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Getting Schooled: Legal Mobilization as an Educative Process
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Getting Schooled: Legal Mobilization as an Educative Process
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Getting Schooled: Legal Mobilization as an Educative Process
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *