Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-xdj6x Total loading time: 0.17 Render date: 2021-09-28T04:43:14.738Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Gender Inequality in Law: Problems of Structure and Agency in Recent Studies of Gender in Anglo-American Legal Professions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Bar Association Commission on Women in the Profession (ABA Commission). 1995. Women in Law: A Look at the Numbers. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field. Hustings Law Journal 38:805–53.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A. 1990. Final Report to the Illinois Task Force on Gender Bias in the Courts. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A., and Carson, Clara N.. 1994. The Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in the 1990s. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1981. Women in Law. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs, Sauté, Robert, Oglensky, Bonnie, and Gever, Martha. 1995. Glass Ceilings and Open Doors: Women's Advancement in the Legal Profession. Fordham Law Review 64:291499.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 19721977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas. 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald, and Mnookin, Robert. 1985. Sharing Among the Human Capitalists: An Economic Inquiry into the Corporate Law Firm and How Partners Split Profits. Stanford Law Review 37:313–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani, Fine, Michelle, and Balin, Jane. 1997. Becoming Gentlemen: Women, Law School, and Institutional Change. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Heimer, Carol A. 1996. Gender Inequalities in the Distribution of Responsibilities. In Social Differentiation and Social Inequality: Essays in Honor of John Pock, ed. James, N. Baron, David, B. Grusky, and Donald, J. Treiman. Boulder, Colo . Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mahony, Rhona. 1995. Kidding Ourselves: Breadwinning, Babies, and Bargaining Power. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1994. The Futures of American Lawyers: A Demographic Profile of a Changing Profession in a Changing Society. Case Western Reserve Law Review 44 (2):345406.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1988. Partners with Power: The Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L., and Trubek, David M.. 1992. New Problems and New Paradigms in Studies of the Legal Profession. In Lawyers' Ideals/Lawyers' Practices: Transformations In the American Legal Profession, ed. Robert, L. Nelson, David, M. Trubek, and Ray-man, Solomon L.. Ithaca, N.Y. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force. 1994. The Effects of Gender in the Federal Courts: The Final Report of the Ninth Circuit Gender Bias Task Force. Southern California Law Review 67(4):7451106.Google Scholar
Sander, Richard H., and Williams, E. Douglas 1989. Why Are There So Many Lawyers? Perspectives on a Turbulent Market. Law and Social Inquiry 14(3):431–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seron, Carroll, and Ferris, Kerry. 1995. Negotiating Professionalism: The Gendered Social Capital of Flexible Time. Work and Occupations 22(1):2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1992. A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Special Committee on Gender 1996. Report of the Special Committee on Gender to the Gender, Race, and Ethnic Bias Task Force Project in the D.C. Circuit. Georgetown Law Journal 84(5):16571893.Google Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Gender Inequality in Law: Problems of Structure and Agency in Recent Studies of Gender in Anglo-American Legal Professions
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Gender Inequality in Law: Problems of Structure and Agency in Recent Studies of Gender in Anglo-American Legal Professions
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Gender Inequality in Law: Problems of Structure and Agency in Recent Studies of Gender in Anglo-American Legal Professions
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *