Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-65dc7cd545-fz4lj Total loading time: 0.181 Render date: 2021-07-24T06:09:29.106Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Elements of the Support Structure for Campaign Finance Litigation in the Roberts Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018


This article considers the organizations, financial patrons, and lawyers involved in two significant campaign finance cases decided by the Roberts Court: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission. The research indicates that these elements of the support structures for litigation on both sides of these cases, like the justices to whom they direct their advocacy, fall into well-defined opposing and partisan camps. It also suggests that strategic case selection on the challengers' side, the diversity of organizations supporting their positions, their network and coordination, and a simple and powerful frame around which to rally may have contributed to their success and to the Roberts Court's fundamental reshaping of campaign finance doctrine.

Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.


Abrams, Floyd. 2013. Friend of the Court: On the Front Lines with the First Amendment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, Jill. 1986. Right Place at the Right Time. American Lawyer, June, p. 99.Google Scholar
AFL‐CIO. 2012. AFL‐CIO Executive Council Statement on Citizens United, March 14. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Alliance Defending Freedom. n.d. For Faith. For Justice. (accessed March 13, 2015).Google Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union. n.d. Campaign Finance Reform. (accessed July 1, 2016).Google Scholar
American Constitution Society. n.d. About ACS: Shaping Debate, Building Networks, Making a Difference. (accessed May 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Bachman, Katy. 2011. Big Tobacco Gets Top First Amendment Lawyer for New Suit. AdWeek, December 22. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A. 2007. Answering the Call of the Court: How Justices and Litigants Set the Supreme Court Agenda. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Baldas, Tresa. 2004. Law School Turf War Ignites: The Federalist Society Vies with Emerging ACS. National Law Journal, April 26, p. 1.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2006. Judges and Their Audiences: A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence, and Devins, Neal. 2010. Why the Supreme Court Cares About Elites, Not the American People. Georgetown Law Review 98:1515–44.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Kedar S. 2012. Top Supreme Court Advocates of the Twenty‐First Century. Journal of Legal Metrics 2:561–82.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam, and Sen, Maya. 2015. The Politics of Selecting the Bench from the Bar: The Legal Profession and Partisan Incentives to Politicize the Judiciary. SSRN, January 5. (accessed March 1, 2016).Google Scholar
Brennan Center for Justice. n.d. Our Mission. (accessed March 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Campaign Legal Center. n.d. About. (accessed December 7, 2015).Google Scholar
Carney, Eliza Newlin. 2016. Time for an ACLU Shift on Campaign Finance? American Prospect, November 3. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Carter, Terry. 2003. Herding Liberals: A New But Growing Group Seeks to Counter the Influence of the Conservative Federalist Society. American Bar Association Journal 39:5055.Google Scholar
Center for Competitive Politics. n.d. About the Center for Competitive Politics. (accessed March 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Citizens United. n.d. Who We Are. (accessed December 7, 2015).Google Scholar
Clines, Francis X. 2015. Taking Note, Hillary Rodham Clinton Ups the Super PAC Ante. New York Times, May 14. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Cole, David. 2016. How to Reverse Citizens United. Atlantic, April. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Collins, Paul M. 2004. Friends of the Court: Examining the Influence of Amicus Curiae Participation in U.S. Supreme Court Litigation. Law & Society Review 38:807–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Paul M., Corley, Pamela C., and Hamner, Jesse. 2014. Me Too? An Investigation of Repetition in U.S. Supreme Court Amicus Briefs. Judicature 97:228–34.Google Scholar
Collins, Ronald. 2014a. The ACLU & the McCutcheon Case. SCOTUS Blog. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Collins, Ronald. 2014b. Six Former ACLU Leaders Contest Group's 1st Amendment Position on Campaign Finance—ACLU's Legislative Director Responds. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Collins, Ronald, and Skover, David. 2014. When Money Speaks: The McCutcheon Decision, Campaign Finance Laws, and the First Amendment. Oak Park, IL: SCOTUS Books in Brief.Google Scholar
Common Cause. n.d. About Us. (accessed March 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Confessore, Nicholas, and Thee‐Brenan, Megan. 2015. Poll Shows Americans Favor an Overhaul of Campaign Financing. New York Times, June 2, p. A18.Google Scholar
Congressional Record. 2000. Vol. 146, 8769–75. Washington, DC: US Government Publishing Office. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Connelly, Michael. 2015a. Aid and Comfort. (accessed April 22, 2015).Google Scholar
Connelly, Michael. 2015b. Obama's BFFs. (accessed April 22, 2015).Google Scholar
Cooper, Charles. 1987. The First Amendment, Original Intent, and the Political Process. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 10:1520.Google Scholar
Coyle, Marcia. 2014. The Roberts Court: The Struggle for the Constitution. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Democracy 21. n.d. Our Mission. (accessed March 13, 2015).Google Scholar
Devins, Neal, and Baum, Lawrence. 2015. Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned the Supreme Court into a Partisan Court. William & Mary Law School Research Paper 09–276 (downloaded February 17, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyche, John David. 2010. Republican Leader: A Political Biography of Senator Mitch McConnell. Wilmington, DE: Intercollegiate Studies Institute.Google Scholar
Ebner, Lawrence S., and Conrad, Robin S. 2015. Making Strategic Use of Amicus Briefs. For the Defense, October, pp. 7578.Google Scholar
Edwards, Lee. 2004. Bringing Justice to the People: The Story of the Freedom‐Based Public Interest Law Movement. Washington, DC: Heritage Books.Google Scholar
Ehrenfreund, Max. 2015. Gyrocopter Pilot Lands at Capitol to Protest Money in Politics. Washington Post, April 16. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Epp, Charles. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Fact Check. 2010. Players Guide 2010: Committee for Truth in Politics. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Federalist Society. n.d.a. About Us: Board of Directors. (accessed May 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Federalist Society n.d.b. About Us: Board of Visitors. (accessed May 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Federalist Society n.d.c. About Us: Civil Rights Practice Group Executive Committee Contact Information. (accessed May 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Federalist Society n.d.d. About Us: Free Speech and Election Law Executive Committee Contact Information. (accessed May 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Federalist Society n.d.e. Experts: Ilya Shapiro. (accessed May 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Federalist Society n.d.f. Experts: Hon. Charles Cooper. (accessed May 12, 2015).Google Scholar
Federalist Society n.d.g. Our Background. (accessed May 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Fischer, Brendan. 2014. Historic Debate: Senate Advances Constitutional Amendment to Overturn Citizens United. PRWatch, September 9. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Ford Foundation. n.d. About Us. (accessed November 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Gans, David H. 2014. Silence Inc. What Side Has Corporate America Taken in the Hobby Lobby Challenge? Slate, February 4. (accessed July 14, 2017).Google Scholar
Goelzhauser, Greg, and Vouvalis, Nicole. 2014. Amicus Coalition Heterogeneity and Signaling Credibility in Supreme Court Agenda Setting. Journal of Federalism 45:99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Matea, and Gearan, Anne. 2015. Hillary Clinton's Litmus Test for Supreme Court Nominees: A Pledge to Overturn Citizens United . Washington Post, May 14. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Gora, Joel. 2003. The Legacy of Buckley v. Valeo . Election Law Journal 2:5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graber, Mark. 2013. The Coming Constitutional Yo‐Yo? Elite Opinion, Polarization, and the Direction of Judicial Decision Making. Howard Law Journal 56:661719.Google Scholar
Haberman, Maggie, and Confessore, Nicholas. 2015. Hillary Clinton Embraces a “Super PAC,” Trying to Erode a Republican Edge. New York Times, May 6, p. A1.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Tom, and Gold, Matea. 2014. Crossroads GPS Probably Broke Election Law, FEC Lawyers Concluded. Washington Post, January 15. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard. 2012. Anticipatory Overrulings, Invitations, Time Bombs, and Inadvertence: How Supreme Court Justices Move the Law. Emory Law Journal 61:779800.Google Scholar
Hasen, Richard. 2016. Plutocrats United: Campaign Money, The Supreme Court, and the Distortion of American Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hayward, Allison R. 2008. Revisiting the Fable of Reform. Harvard Journal on Legislation 45:421–70.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P., Southworth, Ann, and Paik, Anthony. 2003. Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance. Law & Society Review 36:550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis‐Brusky, Amanda. 2015. Ideas Have Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Institute for Justice. n.d. About Us. (accessed June 15, 2016).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Ben. 2013. Meet Shaun McCutcheon, The Republican Activist Trying to Make History at the Supreme Court. Daily Beast, October 8. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Johnson, Timothy R., Wahlbeck, Paul J., and Spriggs, James F. II. 2006. The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review 100:99113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Joseph D., and Merrill, Thomas W. 2000. The Influence of Amicus Briefs in the Supreme Court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 148:743831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koshner, Andrew Jay. 1998. Solving the Puzzle of Interest Group Litigation. Westport, CT: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey, Carsey, Thomas, and Horowitz, Juliana. 2006. Party Polarization in American Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 9:83110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazarus, Richard J. 2008. Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar. Georgetown Law Journal 96:14871564.Google Scholar
Lichtblau, Eric. 2010. Long Battle by Foes of Campaign Finance Rules Shifts Landscape. New York Times, October 15, p. A11.Google Scholar
Lichtblau, Eric, and Confessore, Nicholas. 2015. Democrats Seek a Richer Roster to Match G.O.P. New York Times, May 30, p. A1.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam. 2010. Supreme Court Gets a Rare Rebuke, in Front of a Nation. New York Times, January 28, p. A17.Google Scholar
Liptak, Adam 2015. One by One, Protesters Interrupt Supreme Court. New York Times, January 20, p. A15.Google Scholar
McArthur Foundation. n.d. About Us. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCutcheon, Shaun. 2013. Donation Caps Hurt Democracy. Politico, October 6, (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
McGuire, Kevin. 1995. Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success. Journal of Politics 57:187–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mencimer, Stephanie. 2011. The Man Behind Citizens United Is Just Getting Started. Mother Jones, May/June. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Mutch, Robert E. 1988. Campaigns, Congress, and Courts: The Making of Federal Campaign Finance Law. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Mutch, Robert E. 2014. Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
National Right to Work Committee. n.d. About Us. (accessed June 8, 2015).Google Scholar
Nelson, William E., Rishikof, Harvey, Messinger, Scott, and Jo, Michael. 2009. The Liberal Tradition of the Supreme Court Clerkship: Its Rise, Fall, and Reincarnation? Vanderbilt Law Review 62:17491813.Google Scholar
Neuborne, Burt. 2015. Madison's Music: On Reading the First Amendment. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, John. 2014. With “McCutcheon” Ruling, An Activist Court Opts for Full‐On Plutocracy. Nation, April 2. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Novak, Viveca. 2012. Citizen Bopp. American Prospect, January 2. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Open Society Foundations. n.d.a. About Us: Mission and Values. (accessed November 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Open Society Foundations n.d.b. Staff: Aryeh Neier, President Emeritus. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Oyez. 2016. Chicago‐Kent College of Law at Illinois Tech. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Paik, Anthony, Southworth, Ann, and Heinz, John P. 2007. Lawyers of the Right: Networks and Organizations. Law & Social Inquiry 32:883917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Charitable Trusts. 2005. The Role of the Pew Charitable Trusts in Campaign Finance Reform. (accessed June 9, 2015).Google Scholar
Philanthropy News Digest. 2005. Pew Charitable Trusts Awards $4.3 Million to Campaign Finance Organizations. Philanthropy News Digest, December 26. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Post, Robert. 2014. Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regent University. n.d. About Regent Law. (accessed March 25, 2015).Google Scholar
Reuters. 2015. The Echo Chamber: A Small Group of Lawyers and Its Outsized Influence at the Supreme Court. (accessed March 24, 2015).Google Scholar
Rockefeller Foundation. n.d. About Us. (accessed October 10, 2016).Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2000. Incentives, Reputation, and the Inglorious Determinants of Judicial Behavior. University of Cincinnati Law Review 68:615–36.Google Scholar
Searle Freedom Trust. n.d. About the Trust. (accessed March 24, 2015).Google Scholar
Segal, David. 2009. A Matter of Opinion? New York Times, July 18, p. B1.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley A. 2014. Free Speech at Last: McCutcheon Decision Just Right. National Review On‐Line, April 2. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley A. 2016. Politics, Money, and Corruption: The Story of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission . In Election Law Stories, ed. Douglas, Joshua A. and Maso, Eugene D., 313, 330–31. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2005. Conservative Lawyers and the Contest over the Meaning of “Public Interest Law.” UCLA Law Review 52:1223–54.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2008. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southworth, Ann. 2013. What Is Public Interest Law? Empirical Perspectives on an Old Question. DePaul Law Review 62:493518.Google Scholar
Stevens, Charles, and Dolmetsch, Chris. 2013. Robert W. Wilson Leaps to His Death at 87; Hedge‐Fund Founder and Philanthropist. Washington Post, December 25, p. B1.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey R. 2012. Citizens United and Conservative Judicial Activism. University of Illinois Law Review 2012:485–99.Google Scholar
Suchman, Mark, and Mertz, Elizabeth. 2010. Toward a New Legal Empiricism? Empirical Legal Studies and New Legal Realism. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6:555–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2007. 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Teachout, Zephyr. 2014. Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Stephen. 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2012. Money Unlimited: How Chief Justice Roberts Orchestrated the Citizens United Decision. New Yorker, May 21. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Trujillo, Mario. 2015. Protestors Release Video of Supreme Court Outburst. Hill, April 2. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. n.d. Census Regions and Divisions of the United States. (accessed February 17, 2015).Google Scholar
Viswanatha, Aruna, and Freifeld, Karen. 2015. S & P Reaches $1.5 Billion Deal with U.S. States Over Crisis‐Era Rating. Reuters, February 3. (accessed July 12, 2017).Google Scholar
Wedeking, Justin. 2010. Supreme Court Litigants and Strategic Framing. American Journal of Political Science 54:617–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Civil Liberties Union v. Jennings, 366 F. Supp. 1041 (D.D.C. 1973) (three‐judge court), vacated as moot, sub. nom. Staats v. American Civil Liberties Union, 422 US 1030 (1975).Google Scholar
American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock, 132 S. Ct. 2490 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, 564 US 721 (2011).Google Scholar
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce, 494 US 652 (1990).Google Scholar
Bellotti v. First National Bank of Boston, 435 US 765 (1978).Google Scholar
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 US 1 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Inc., 134 S. Ct. 2751 (2014).Google Scholar
Bush v. Gore, 531 US 98 (2000).Google Scholar
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 US 310 (2010).Google Scholar
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Memorandum Opinion, Dist. Ct. D.C., Jan. 1, 2008.Google Scholar
Davis v. FEC, 554 US 724 (2008).Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life, 479 US 238 (1986).Google Scholar
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc., 551 US 449 (2007).Google Scholar
Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S. Ct. 2652 (2013).Google Scholar
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 US 558 (2003).Google Scholar
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, 540 US 93 (2003).Google Scholar
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 134 S. Ct. 434 (2014).Google Scholar
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 US 230 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riddle v. Hickenlooper, 742 F.3d 922 (10th Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
Republican Party of Louisiana et al. v. Federal Election Commission, Dkt. 16‐865 (2017).Google Scholar
United States v. National Committee for Impeachment, 469 F.2d 1135 (2d Cir. 1972).Google Scholar
Williams‐Yulee v. Florida Bar, 135 S. Ct. 1656 (2015).Google Scholar
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107‐155, 116 Stat. 81 (2002).Google Scholar
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Elements of the Support Structure for Campaign Finance Litigation in the Roberts Court
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Elements of the Support Structure for Campaign Finance Litigation in the Roberts Court
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Elements of the Support Structure for Campaign Finance Litigation in the Roberts Court
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *