Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-tcbk7 Total loading time: 0.291 Render date: 2021-09-17T05:11:01.065Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

The Bar Examination and the Dream Deferred: A Critical Analysis of the MBE, Social Closure, and Racial and Ethnic Stratification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018


In this article, the author applies social closure theory to help explain why more than a dozen states have recently enacted more stringent bar exam passing standards and why others are considering similar changes. While higher standards are usually advocated as a way to protect the public from lower student “quality,” the author applies social closure theory and argues that changes in passing standards are a response to a perceived oversupply of lawyers, especially among solo practitioners. In the 1990s, crowding among solo practitioners reached record levels, and real earnings eroded substantially. The author then links this labor market analysis to a critical examination of the knowledge claims that justify the bar exam to the legal profession and the public at large. The article's conclusion is that the psychometric research sponsored by the National Conference of Bar Examiners consistently minimizes and obscures the disparate impact and unfairness of the bar exam for people of color.

Research Article
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Abel, Richard L. 1988. United States: The Contradictions of Professionalism. In Lawyers in Society Volume One: The Common Law World, ed. Abel, Richard L. and Lewis, Philip S. C., 186243. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L. 1989. American Lawyers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Abercrombie, Nicholas, Hill, Stephen, and Turner, Bryan S. 1994. The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology, Scholar
Allen, Walter R., and Solorzano, Daniel 2001. Expert Report on Behalf of Student Intervenors in Grutter v. Bollinger: Affirmative Action, Educational Equity, and Campus Racial Climate: A Case Study of the University of Michigan Law School. Reprinted in Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 12:237363.Google Scholar
Amendments to Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar. 2003. 843 So.2d 245 (Fla. 2003); 2003 WL 1339174.Google Scholar
American Bar Association (ABA). 2000. Official American Bar Association Guide to Approved Law Schools, 2001 Edition. Foster City, Calif.: IDG Books Worldwide.Google Scholar
American Bar Association and Law School Admission Council (ABA and LSAC). 2001. Official Guide to ABA-Approved Law Schools, 2002 Edition. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Association Commission on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in the Profession. 2000. Miles to Go 2000: Progress of Minorities in the Legal Profession. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
American Bar Foundation. 2001. The Legal Profession–Chicago Lawyers II. Scholar
Angel, Marina 1988. Women in Legal Education: What It's Like to Be Part of a Perpetual First Wave, or the Case of the Disappearing Women. Temple Law Review 61:799841.Google Scholar
Ansley, Francis Lee 1991. Race and the Core Curriculum in Legal Education. California Law Review 79:1511–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahls, Steven C. 2001. Standard Setting: The Impact of Higher Standards on the Quality of Legal Education. Bar Examiner, November, 1517.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, William G., and Bok, Derek 1998. The Shape of the River: Long-term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowers, Allison L. 2000. Women at the University of Texas School of Law: A Call for Action. Texas Journal of Women and the Law 9:117–65.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, James 1996. Passing Bar Exam Expected to be Harder. Columbus Dispatch, 24 April, B3.Google Scholar
Brennan, Robert T., et al. 2001. The Relative Equitability of High-Stakes Testing versus Teacher-Assigned Grades: An Analysis of the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS). Harvard Educational Review 71:173216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgeman, Brent, McCamley-Jenkins, Laura, and Ervin, Nancy 2000. Predictions of Freshman Grade-Point Average From the Revised and Recentered SAT I: Reasoning Test. College Board Research Report No. 2000–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Scott 2000. Minnesota Officials Debate Passing Score for State Bar Exam. Knight-Ridder Tribune Business News, 4 June; 2000 WL 22619756.Google Scholar
Carson, Clara N. 1999. The Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in 1995. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Carter, Terry 1998. Rankled by the Rankings. ABA Journal, March, 4652.Google Scholar
Cho, Sumi, and Westley, Robert 2000. Critical Race Coalitions: Key Movements that Performed the Theory. U.C. Davis Law Review 33:1377–427. Cleveland Plain Dealer. 1996. Raising the Bar: The Regents Want a Better Class of Ohio Law Student, but May Wind Up Hurting Urban College Programs. Cleveland Plain Dealer, 11 July, B10.Google Scholar
Clydesdale, Timothy T. 2003. On Becoming a Lawyer: Exploring Race, Gender, Age, and Other Factors Underlying Law School Performance and Bar Passage. Paper presented at the Law & Society Annual Meeting, Pittsburgh, June 2003.Google Scholar
College Board. 1988. College Bound Seniors: 1988 Profile of SAT and Achievement Test Takers. New York: College Board Publications.Google Scholar
College Board. 1994- College Bound Seniors: 1994 Profile of SAT and Achievement Test Takers. New York: College Board Publications.Google Scholar
College Board. 2001. 2001 College Bound Seniors Are the Largest, Most Diverse Group in History. College Board Press Release, Scholar
College Board. 2002. A Brief History of the SAT. Scholar
Collins, Randall 1979. The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Curcio, Andrea A. 2002. A Better Bar: Why and How the Existing Bar Exam Should Change. Nebraska Law Review 81:363423.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A., and Carson, Clara N. 1991. Supplement to the Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in 1988. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A., and Carson, Clara N. 1994. The Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in the 1990s. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Delgado, Richard 1984. The Imperial Scholar: Reflections on a Review of Civil Rights Literature. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 132:561–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgado, Richard 1992. The Imperial Scholar Revisited: How to Marginalize Outsider Writing, Ten Years Later. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 140:1349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickens, William T., and Kane, Thomas J. 1999. Racial Test Score Differences as Evidence of Reverse Discrimination: Less Than Meets the Eye. Industrial Relations 38:331–63.Google Scholar
Dooley, Laurel-Ann 1996. Making the Grade: Ohio Regents Tie State Law School Subsidies to Scholastic Achievements of Incoming Students. ABA Journal, December, 36.Google Scholar
Dowd, Nancy E., Nunn, Kenneth B., and Pendergast, Jane E. 2003. Diversity Matters: Race, Gender, and Ethnicity in Legal Education. University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy 15:1155.Google Scholar
Duban, Jeffrey M. 1991. The Bar Exam as a Test of Competence: The Idea Whose Time Never Came. New York State Bar Journal, July/August, 3440.Google Scholar
Duffy, Elizabeth A., and Goldberg, Idana 1998. Crafting a Class: College Admissions and Financial Aid, 19551994. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, Laura 1994. July's State Bar Pass Rate: 19 out of 20. Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, 25 November, 3.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1995. The Status-Production Sideshow: Why the Antidiscrimination Laws Are Still a Mistake. Harvard Law Review 108:1085–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 1978. Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 C.F.R. $ 1607.4.Google Scholar
Equal Justice Society et al. 2003. Facts and Fantasies about UC Berkeley Admissions: A Critical Evaluation of Regent John Moore's Report. Scholar
Farkas, George, and Vicknair, Keven 1996. Appropriate Tests of Racial Wage Discrimination Require Controls for Cognitive Skill: Comment on Cancio, Evans, and Maume. American Sociological Review 61:557–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
First, Harry 1978. Competition in the Legal Education Industry (I). New York University Law Review 53:311474.Google Scholar
Florida Board of Bar Examiners. 2000. Reply to Comments Submitted to the Florida Supreme Court Pertaining to the Board's Pending Proposed Rule Amendments. Tallahassee, Florida .Google Scholar
Florida Board of Bar Examiners. 2001. Re Amendment to Rules of the Florida Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar. Filed 5 September (July 2000 exam results) and 23 July (February 2000 exam results). Tallahassee, Florida .Google Scholar
Florida State Conference of NAACP Branches. 2000. Supplement to Comments regarding Case No. 96,869 (case regarding proposed amendments to rules of the supreme court), 16 August.Google Scholar
Funk, John 1996. Caucus Calls Regents' Plan Elitist. Cleveland Plain Dealer, 3 May, B2.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc 1999. “Old and in the Way”: The Coming Demographic Transformation of the Legal Profession and Its Implications for the Provision of Legal Services. Wisconsin Law Review 1999:1081–117.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc, and Palay, Thomas 1991. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gannon, Joseph 1981. College Grades and LSAT Scores: An Opportunity to Examine the “Real Differences” in Minority-Nonminority Performance. In Toward a Diversified Legal Profession, ed. White, David M., 272–83. San Francisco: Julian Richardson Associates.Google Scholar
Glen, Kristin Booth 2002. When and Where We Enter: Rethinking Admission to the Legal Profession. Columbia Law Review 102:1696–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfredson, Linda S. 1994. The Science and Politics of Race-Norming. American Psychologist 49:955–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottfredson, Linda S. 2000. Skills Gaps, Not Tests, Make Racial Proportionality Impossible. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6:129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, Michael D., Michael Freedman, D., and Cordis, Leon 2000. Reference Guide on Epidemiology. In Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 333400. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Judith G. 1994. Erasing Race from Legal Education. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 28:51118.Google Scholar
Grissmer, David W. 2000. The Continuing Use and Misuse of SAT Scores. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6:223–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani 2000. Confirmative Action. Law & Social Inquiry 25:565–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani et al. 1994. Becoming Gentlemen: Women's Experiences at One Ivy League Law School. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 143:1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulati, Mitu, Sander, Richard, and Sockloskie, Robert 2001. The Happy Charade: An Empirical Examination of the Third Year of Law School. Journal of Legal Education. 51:235–66.Google Scholar
Hadfield, Gillian K. 2000. The Price of Law: How the Market for Lawyers Distorts the Justice System. Michigan Law Review 98:9531006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haney Lopez, Ian F. 2000. Institutional Racism: Judicial Conduct and a New Theory of Racial Discrimination. Yak Law Journal 109:1717–884.Google Scholar
Harris, Cheryl I. 1993. Whiteness as Property. Harvard Law Review 106:1707–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinz, John P., and Laumann, Edward O. 1994- Revised ed. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Heinz, John P. et al. 1998. The Changing Character of Lawyers' Work: Chicago in 1975 and 1995. Law and Society Review 32:751–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrnstein, Richard J., and Murray, Charles 1994- The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hess, Gerald F. 2002. Hearts and Heads: The Teaching and Learning Environment in Law School. Journal of Legal Education 52:75111.Google Scholar
Holley, Dannye, and Kleven, Thomas 1991. The Bar Examination and Other Barriers to African and Hispanic American Fair Representation Among American Lawyers: A 1990 Update–Perspectives–and Recommendations. Thurgood Marshall Law Review 16:477–98.Google Scholar
Homet, Suzanne, and Schwartz, Lois 198990. Admitted But Not Accepted: Outsiders Take an Inside Look at Law School. Berkeley Women's Law Journal 5:174.Google Scholar
Hough, Leaetta M. 1984. Development and Evaluation of the “Accomplishment Record” Method of Selecting and Promoting Professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology 69:135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Leaetta M., Keyes, Margaret A., and Dunnette, Marvin D. 1983. An Evaluation of Three “Alternative” Selection Procedures. Personnel Psychology 36:261–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howarth, Joan 1997. Teaching in the Shadow of the Bar. University of San Francisco Law Review. 31:927–40.Google Scholar
Howarth, Joan, and Kaufman, Eileen 2000. Report from Bar Exam Task Force. SALT Equalizer, 2 December.Google Scholar
Huffman, Cassie 2001. U. Arkansas Helps Get State Bar Exam Changed. Arkansas Traveler, J 9 February.Google Scholar
Hunt, Cecil J. II. 1996. Guests in Another's House: An Analysis of Racially Disparate Bar Performance. Florida State Law Review 23:721–93.Google Scholar
Jencks, Christopher 1998. Racial Bias in Testing. In The Black-White Test Score Gap, ed. Jencks, Christopher and Philips, Meredith, 5585. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kane, Michael T. 2001. Standard Setting for Licensure Examinations. Bar Examiner, November, 69.Google Scholar
Kaye, David H., and Freedman, David A. 2000. Reference Guide on Statistics. In Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, 83178. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.Google Scholar
Kidder, William C. 2000a. Portia Denied: Unmasking Gender Bias on the LSAT and Its Relationship to Racial Diversity in Legal Education. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 12:142.Google Scholar
Kidder, William C. 2000b. Situating Asian Pacific Americans in the Law School Affirmative Action Debate: Empirical Facts About Thernstrom's Rhetorical Acts. Asian Law Journal 7:2968.Google Scholar
Kidder, William C. 2000c. The Rise of the Testocracy: An Essay on the LSAT, Conventional Wisdom, and the Dismantling of Diversity. Texas Journal of Women and the Law 9:167218.Google Scholar
Kidder, William C. 2001. Comment, Does the LSAT Mirror or Magnify Racial and Ethnic Differences in Educational Attainment? A Study of Equally Achieving “Elite” College Students. California Law Review 89:1055–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Chris 1996. 111. Dean's Dilemma–Is Bar Exam (A) Sentry or (B) Aptitude Test National Law Journal, 30 December, A16.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1979. An Analysis of the Relationships Between Bar Examination Scores and an Applicant's Law School, Admissions Test Scores, Grades, Sex, and Racial/Ethnic Group. Paper presented to the National Conference of Bar Examiners and the American Bar Association. Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1986a. Establishing Pass/Fail Standards. Bar Examiner, August, 1830.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1986b. How to Respond to the Critics. Bar Examiner, February, 1624.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1989. Bar Examinations: Ignoring the Thermometer Does Not Change the Temperature. New York State Bar Journal, October, 2833.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1991. Disparities in Bar Exam Passing Rates Among Racial/Ethnic Groups: Their Size, Source, and Implications. Thurgood Marshall Law Review 16:517–30.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1993. Summary of Research on the Multistate Bar Examination. Santa Monica, Calif.: GANSK.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 1999. Panelist and Reader Judgments Regarding the Passing Score on the Florida Bar Exam. Report by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners' Technical Consultant, filed with the Supreme Court in Case No. 98,689 (case regarding amendment to the rules), 12 August.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. 2001. Setting Bar Exam Passing Scores and Standards. Bar Examiner, November, 1215.Google Scholar
Klein, Stephen P. and Bolus, Roger 1997. The Size and Source of Differences in Bar Exam Passing Rates Among Racial and Ethnic Groups. Bar Examiner, November, 816.Google Scholar
Larntz, Kinley 1999. Expert Report in Grutter v. Bollinger. Michigan Journal of Race and Law 5:463557.Google Scholar
Larson, Magali Sarfatti 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lauer, Nancy Cook 2001. Passing Bar Test May Get Tougher But Minorities Who Want to be Lawyers May Suffer, Some Say. Tallahassee Democrat, 4 October, BI.Google Scholar
Law School Admission Council. 19912001. National Decision Profiles (memoranda distributed annually to law school admission officials).Google Scholar
Law School Admission Council. 1995. The Official Guide to U.S. Law Schools, 1996 Edition. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.Google Scholar
Law School Admission Council. 1997. National Statistical Reports 1991–92 Through 1995–96.Google Scholar
Services, Law 1998. Applicant Data Reveal National Trends. Law Services Report, July/August, 16.Google Scholar
Lempert, Richard O., Chambers, David A., and Adams, Terry K. 2000. Michigan's Minority Graduates in Practice: The River Runs Through Law School. Law & Social Inquiry 25:395505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerner, Barbara 1982. American Education: How Are We Doing Public Interest. Fall: 5982.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah J., Hargens, Lowell L., and Reskin, Barbara F. 2001. Raising the Bar: A Social Science Critique of Recent Increases to Passing Scores on the Bar Exam. University of Cincinnati Law Review 69:929–68.Google Scholar
Merritt, Deborah Jones 2001. Raising the Bar: Limiting Entry to the Legal Profession. Bar Examiner, November, 912.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth, Njogu, Wamucii, and Gooding, Susan 1998. What Difference Does Difference Make: The Challenge of Legal Education. Journal of Legal Education 48:186.Google Scholar
Montoya, Margaret E. 1994 Mascaras, Trenzas, y Greas: Un/masking the Self While Un/braiding Latina Stories and Legal Discourse. Harvard Women's Law Journal 17:185220.Google Scholar
Moran, Beverly 2000. The Wisconsin Diploma Privilege: Try It, You'll Like It. Wisconsin Law Review 2000:645–55.Google Scholar
Moran, Rachel F. 2000. Diversity and Its Discontents: The End of Affirmative Action at Boalt Hall. California Law Review 88:2241–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morello, Karen Berger 1986. The Invisible Bar: The Woman Lawyer in America–1638 to the Present. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Morrow, Raymond A., and Alberto Torres, Carlos 1998. Social Closure, Professional Domination, and the New Middle Strata: Rethinking Credentialist Theories of Education. In Sociology of Education: Emerging Perspectives, ed. Alberto Torres, Carlos and Mitchell, Theodore R., 121–41. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, Jennifer 20012002. Facing the Unhappy Day: Three Aspects of the High Stakes Testing Movement. Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 11:201–78.Google Scholar
Murphy, Raymond 1988. Social Closure: The Theory of Monopolization and Exclusion. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myers, Ken 1991. Some of the States Would Rather You not Mention Bar Pass Rates. National Law Journal, 30 December, 4.Google Scholar
National Conference of Bar Examiners. 19812003. Bar Examinations Statistics (published annually in the May Bar Examiner). See also Scholar
National Conference of Bar Examiners. 1995. Myths and Facts About the Multistate Bar Examination. Bar Examiner, February, 1819.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert L. 1994. The Futures of American Lawyers: A Demographic Profile of a Changing Profession in a Changing Society. Case Western Reserve Law Review 44:345406.Google Scholar
New York State Board of Law Examiners. 2002. Report and Recommendation to the Court of Appeals Regarding the Passing Standard on the New York State Bar Examination, Scholar
Olivas, Michael A. 1992. Trout Fishing in Catfish Ponds. In Minorities in Graduate Education: Pipeline, Policy, and Practice, ed. Jones, Jessie M. et al. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
Olivas, Michael A. 1997. Constitutional Criteria: The Social Science and Common Law of Admissions Decisions in Higher Education. University of Colorado Law Review 68:1065–121.Google Scholar
Parkin, Frank 1979. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, Henry Jr. 1998. Historical Introduction. In Wightman 1998, iiivii.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, Stephen W. 1999. Supplemental Expert Witness Report, Grutter v. Bollinger et al. No. 97–75928 (E.D. Mich.), 3 March.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. Sherman. 1989. Title VII Preemption of State Bar Examinations: Applicability of Title VII to State Occupational Licensing Tests. Howard Law journal 32:563625.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin 1992. The Market for Lawyers. Journal of Law and Economics 35:215–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sackett, Paul R., and Wilk, Steffanie L. 1994- Within-Group Norming and Other Forms of Score Adjustment in Preemployment Testing. American Psychologist 49:929–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sandefur, Rebecca L., and Heinz, John P. 1999. Winner-Take-All Markets for Legal Services and Lawyers' Job Satisfaction. American Bar Foundation Working Paper No. 9906.Google Scholar
Sander, Richard H., and Douglas Williams, E. 1989. Why Are There So Many Lawyers? Perspectives on a Turbulent Market. Law and Social Inquiry 14:431–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulny, Susan 2003. A Case for Making It Tougher to Pass the Bar, and a Rebuttal. New York Times, 13 April, A19.Google Scholar
Scullin, Matthew H. et al. 2000. The Role of IQ and Education in Predicting Later Labor Market Outcomes: Implications for Affirmative Action. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6:6389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedlacek, William E. 1994. Issues in Advancing Diversity Through Assessment. Journal of Counseling and Development 72:549–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shalom, Stephen R. 1998. Dubious Data: The Thernstroms on Race in America. Race and Society 1:125–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, George B. 2003. Defending the Aristocracy: ABA Accreditation and the Filtering of Political Leaders. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 12:637–63.Google Scholar
Shoben, Elaine W. 1978. Differential Pass-Fail Rates in Employment Testing: Statistical Proof Under Title VII. Harvard Law Review. 91:793813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Society of American Law Teachers. 2002. Statement on the Bar Exam. Journal of Legal Education 52:446–52.Google Scholar
State Bar of California. 1997. Bar Examination Statistics, July, Scholar
State Bar of California. 1998, Bar Examination Statistics, July, Scholar
State Bar of California. 1999 Bar Examination Statistics, July, Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan, and Thernstrom, Abigail 1997. America in Black and White: One Nation, Indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Blade, Toledo. 2000a. University Plans to Raise Prestige of its Law School. Toledo Blade, 23 February,, article ID: 0002230086.Google Scholar
Blade, Toledo. 2000b. UT Says Its Law School Changes Could Pay Off If Funding Is Revised. Toledo Blade, 9 July,, article ID: 0007100178.Google Scholar
Topping, Robbin 2002. Law Deans Protest Bar Exam Change. Newsday, 11 December, A26.Google Scholar
Tracey, Terence J., and Sedlacek, William E. 1984. Noncognitive Variables in Predicting Academic Success by Race. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 16:171–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Education. 1999. The Condition of Education. Washington, D.C: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Vaughns, Katherine L. 1991. Towards Parity in Bar Passage Rates and Law School Performance: Exploring the Sources of Disparities Between Racial and Ethnic Groups. Thurgood Marshall Law Review 16:425–75.Google Scholar
White, David M. 1978. The Definition of Legal Competence: Will the Circle be Unbroken Santa Clara Law Review 18:641–85.Google Scholar
White, David M. 2000. Comments on Case No. 98,689, Florida Supreme Court, April 6. Available from Testing for the Public, Berkeley, Calif.Google Scholar
White, David M. 2001. Expert Report in Grutter v. Bollinger. Berkeley La Raza Law Journal 12:399427.Google Scholar
White, David M., and Ellen Roth, Terry 1979. The Law School Admission Test and the Continuing Minority Status of Women in Law Schools. Harvard Women's Law Journal 2:103–10.Google Scholar
Wigdor, Alexandra K., and Sackett, Paul R. 1993. Employment Testing and Public Policy: The Case of the General Aptitude Test Battery. In Personnel Selection and Assessment: Individual and Organizational Perspectives, ed. Schuler, Heinz et. al. 183204. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wightman, Linda F. 1996. Women in Legal Education: A Comparison of the Law School Performance and Law School Experiences of Women and Men. Newtown, Penn.: LSAC Research Report Series.Google Scholar
Wightman, Linda F. 1997. The Threat to Diversity in Legal Education: An Empirical Analysis of the Consequences of Abandoning Race as a Factor in Law School Admission Decisions. New York University Law Review 72:153.Google Scholar
Wightman, Linda F. 1998. LSAC National Longitudinal Bar Passage Study. LSAC Research Report Series.Google Scholar
Wightman, Linda F., and Muller, David G. 1990. An Analysis of Differential Validity and Differential Prediction for Black, Mexican American Hispanic, and White Law School Students. Report 90–03. Newtown, Penn.: LSAC Research Report Series.Google Scholar
Wildman, Stephanie M. 1996. Privilege Revealed: How Invisible Preferences Undermine America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Jackson 1998. Irreconcilable Principles: Law, Politics, and the Illinois Supreme Court. Northern Illinois University Law Review 18:267330.Google Scholar
Yen, Alfred C. 1996. A Statistical Analysis of Asian Americans and the Affirmative Action Hiring of Law School Faculty. Asian Law Journal 3:3954.Google Scholar
Young, Jeffrey R. 2002. ACT Average Scores Drop Slightly After 2 States Require All 11th Graders to Take the Test. Chronicle of Higher Education, August 21.Google Scholar
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Bar Examination and the Dream Deferred: A Critical Analysis of the MBE, Social Closure, and Racial and Ethnic Stratification
Available formats

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The Bar Examination and the Dream Deferred: A Critical Analysis of the MBE, Social Closure, and Racial and Ethnic Stratification
Available formats

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The Bar Examination and the Dream Deferred: A Critical Analysis of the MBE, Social Closure, and Racial and Ethnic Stratification
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *