Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-ln9sz Total loading time: 0.26 Render date: 2021-09-27T19:55:40.739Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Activist Lawyers in Post-Tiananmen China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Abstract

What do the activities of twenty-first-century Chinese lawyers tell us about the origins and prospects of legal activism under authoritarianism? This essay fits China's Human Rights Lawyers (2014) into an emerging literature on authoritarian legality. The book offers an insider view of a circle of lawyers interested in using China's newly accessible courts as a platform for social activism. It highlights the difficulty of rights lawyers' day-to-day work against the backdrop of the Chinese state's long-term experiment in how to harness the power of law without ceding political control.

Type
Review Essay
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albiston, Catherine R., and Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2014. Funding the Cause: How Public Interest Law Organizations Fund Their Activities and Why It Matters for Social Change. Law & Social Inquiry 39 (1): 6295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alford, William P., ed. 2007. Raising the Bar: The Emerging Legal Profession in East Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, William P., and Winston, Kenneth I. 2011. Introduction. In Prospects for the Professions in China, 122. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Andersen, Ellen Ann. 2006. Out of the Closets & Into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Andrew, Anita, and LaFleur, Rober Andre. 2014. Remonstrance: The Moral Imperative of the Chinese Scholar‐Official. Education About Asia 19 (2): 58.Google Scholar
Benney, Jonathan. 2013. Defending Rights in Contemporary China. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, Nick, and Kyaw Min, San. 2013–2014. Not Just Defending; Advocating for Law in Myanmar. Wisconsin International Law Journal 31 (3): 702–33.Google Scholar
Chua, Lynette J. 2014. Mobilizing Gay Singapore: Rights and Resistance in an Authoritarian State. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Committee to Support Chinese Lawyers and the Leitner Center. 2015. Plights and Prospects: The Landscape for Cause Lawyers in China. Available at http://tinyurl.com/nfakohs (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Deng, Yanhua, and O'Brien, Kevin J. 2013. Relational Repression in China: Using Social Ties to Demobilize Protesters. China Quarterly 215:533–52.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fraenkel, Ernst. [1941] 2010. The Dual State: A Contribution to the Theory of Dictatorship. Clark, N.J. Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. (Originally published by Oxford University Press in 1941.) Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing. 2014. Human Rights Lawyering in Chinese Courtrooms. Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 2 (2): 270–88.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing, and Cullen, Richard. 2008. Weiquan (Rights Protection) Lawyering in an Authoritarian State: Building a Culture of Public‐Interest Lawyering. China Journal 59:111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, Hualing, and Cullen, Richard. 2011. Climbing the Weiquan Ladder: A Radicalizing Process for Rights‐Protection Lawyers. China Quarterly 205:4059.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1974. “From the Native's Point of View”: On the Nature of Anthropological Understanding. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 28 (1): 2645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, John. 2013. The Jurifidication of Cause Advocacy in Socialist Asia: Vietnam as a Case Study. Wisconsin International Law Journal 31: 672701.Google Scholar
Givens, John Wagner. 2013–2014. Sleeping with Dragons? Politically Embedded Lawyers Suing the Chinese State. Wisconsin International Law Journal 31 (3): 734–75.Google Scholar
Gobe, Eric, and Salaymeh, Lena. 2016. Tunisia's ‘Revolutionary’ Lawyers: From Professional Autonomy to Political Mobilization: Tunisia's ‘Revolutionary’ Lawyers. Law & Social Inquiry 41 (2): 311–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goluboff, Risa. 2007. The Lost Promise of Civil Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, eds. 2007. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Oñati International Series in Law and Society. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm. eds. 2012. Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post‐Colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2009. “Telephone Law” and the “Rule of Law”: The Russian Case. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 1 (02): 241–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendley, Kathryn. 2015. Resisting Multiple Narratives of Law in Transition Countries: Russia and Beyond: Narratives of Law in Transition Countries. Law & Social Inquiry 40 (2): 531–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, Chris. 2002. New Social Movements: The Role of Legal Opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy 9 (2): 238–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2008. Walking on Thin Ice: Control, Intimidation and Harassment of Lawyers in China. New York: Human Rights Watch. http://tinyurl.com/glm29hs (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andrew, and Buckley, Chris. 2015. China Targeting Rights Lawyers in a Crackdown. The New York Times, July 22. http://tinyurl.com/nvyxcbj (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Kirby, William C. 1997. The Internationalization of China: Foreign Relations at Home and Abroad in the Republican Era. China Quarterly 150:433–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, Ya‐Wen, and Xiaodan Zhou, Daniel. 2015. Contesting Legality in Authoritarian Contexts: Food Safety, Rule of Law and China's Networked Public Sphere. Law & Society Review 49 (3): 557–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Cheng, David Daokui Li, and Malan Rietveld. 2015. The Big Picture: Debating China's Rebalancing. http://tinyurl.com/op9w7dr (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Link, Perry. 2002. The Anaconda in the Chandelier: Censorship in China Today.” New York Review of Books, April 11. http://tinyurl.com/osvmly2 (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Linzer, Drew A., and Staton, Jeffrey K. 2015. A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012. Journal of Law and Courts 3 (2): 223–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida, and Halliday, Terence C. 2011. Political Liberalism and Political Embeddedness: Understanding Politics in the Work of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers: Politics of Chinese Criminal Defense Lawyers. Law & Society Review 45 (4): 831–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Sida, Lily Liang, and Ethan Michelson. 2014. Migration and Social Structure: The Spatial Mobility of Chinese Lawyers: Migration and Social Structure. Law & Policy 36 (2): 165–94.Google Scholar
Lopez, Gerald P. 1992. Rebellious Lawyering: One Chicano's Vision of Progressive Law Practice. New Perspectives on Law, Culture, and Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lubman, Stanley. 2015. After Crackdown on Rights Lawyers, China's Legal Reform Path Uncertain. Wall Street Journal's China Realtime Blog, July 31. http://tinyurl.com/ng5stfd (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Marshall, Anna‐Maria, and Crocker Hale, Daniel. 2014. Cause Lawyering. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (1): 301–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michalowski, Raymond. 1998. All or Nothing: An Inquiry into the Im(possibility) of Cause Lawyering Under Cuban Socialism. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Scheingold, Stuart A. and Sarat, Austin. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan. 2003. Unhooking from the State: Chinese Lawyers in Transition. PhD diss., University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, and Li, Ke. 2014. Judicial Performance without Independence: The Delivery of Justice and Political Legitimacy in Rural China. Draft paper on file with the author.Google Scholar
Michelson, Ethan, and Sida, Liu. 2014. What Do Chinese Lawyers Want? Political Values and Legal Practice. In China's Emerging Middle Class: Beyond Economic Transformation, ed. Li, Cheng, 310–33. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2015. Interview with the Ministry of Justice About the Opinion on Perfecting the Legal Aid System (#21496;#27861;#37096;#23601;#12298;#20851;#20110;#23436;#21892;#27861;#24459;#25588;#21161;#21046;#24230;#30340;#24847;#35265;#12299;#31572;#35760;#32773;#38382;),June 30. http://tinyurl.com/qfhrkam (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2006. Xinfang: An Alternative to Formal Chinese Legal Institutions. Stanford Journal of International Law 42:103–79.Google Scholar
Minzner, Carl F. 2015. China After the Reform Era. Journal of Democracy 26 (3): 129–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosher, Stacy, and Patrick, Poon, eds. 2009. A Sword and a Shield: China's Human Rights Lawyers. Hong Kong: China Human Rights Lawyers Concern Group.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2009. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics, and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir. 2014. Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (1): 281–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir and Tom Ginsburg. 2008. Introduction. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, ed. Tamir Moustafa and Tom Ginsburg, 1–22. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munger, Frank W., Cummings, Scott L., and Trubek, Louise G. 2013–2014. Mobilizing Law for Justice in Asia: A Comparative Approach. Wisconsin International Law Journal 31:353420.Google Scholar
Nathan, Andrew J. 1986. Chinese Democracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nonet, Philippe, and Selznick, Philip. 2001. Law & Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Ocko, Jonathan K. 1988. I'll Take It All the Way to Beijing: Capital Appeals in the Qing. Journal of Asian Studies 47 (2): 291315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osnos, Evan. 2014. Age of Ambition: Chasing Fortune, Truth, and Faith in the New China, 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony W. 2005. Political (In)justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina. Pitt Latin American Series. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pils, Eva. 2006–2007. Asking the Tiger for His Skin: Rights Activism in China. Fordham International Law Journal 30:1209–87.Google Scholar
Pils, Eva. 2014. China's Human Rights Lawyers: Advocacy and Resistance. Routledge Research in Human Rights Law. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman. 2011. 4 June and Charter 08: Approaches to Remonstrance. China Information 25 (2):121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajah, Jothie. 2011. Punishing Bodies, Securing the Nation: How Rule of Law Can Legitimate the Urbane Authoritarian State. Law & Social Inquiry 36 (4): 945–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A., eds. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford Socio‐Legal Studies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Scheingold, Stuart A. eds. 2006. Cause Lawyers and Social Movements. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law and Politics.Google Scholar
Schell, Orville, and John, Delury. 2013. Wealth and Power: China's Long March to the Twenty‐First Century. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1987. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen, and Sara, Chinski. 1988. Destruction of Houses and Construction of a Cause: Lawyers and Bedouins in the Israeli Courts. In Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities, ed. Sarat, Austin and Scheingold, Stuart, 227–57. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Gordon. 2003. Globalization and the Rule of Law: A Machine that Runs of Itself? International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (3): 427–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E. 2013. Environmental Litigation in China: A Study in Political Ambivalence. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E., and Hassid, Jonathan H. 2012. Amplifying Silence: Uncertainty and Control Parables in Contemporary China. Comparative Political Studies 45 (10): 1230–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Rachel E, and O'Brien, Kevin J. 2012. Politics at the Boundary: Mixed Signals and the Chinese State. Modern China 38 (2): 174–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supreme People's Court (SPC). 2015. Report from SPC Spokesperson on the Current Situation Regarding the Case Filing Registration System” [Zui Gaorenmin Fayuan Fayanren Tongbao Quanguo Fayuan Shishi Li'an Dengji Zhidu Jinzhan Qingkuang]. SPC press release, June 9. http://tinyurl.com/nggq8k4 (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2010. Making Rights a Reality?: Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. Cambridge Disability Law and Policy Series. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa. 2012. Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK: The Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the UK Environmental Movement. Law & Society Review 46 (3): 523–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Yuhua. 2015. Tying the Autocrat's Hands: The Rise of the Rule of Law in China. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Rujiu. 2015. Concerns About Weiquan Lawyers [#20013;#22269;#32500;#26435;#24459;#24072;#30340;#26377;#24605;#34385;],” January 18. http://tinyurl.com/o7njs2q (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Xinhua News Agency. 2014. Highlights of Work Report of China's Supreme People's Court. March 10. http://tinyurl.com/pz8pq2y (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Xinhua News Agency. 2015. China Champions Legal Protection of Human Rights, July 24. http://tinyurl.com/qh42juv (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Xu, Weiping. 2015. How to Correctly Understand the Case Filing Registration System [Zenyang zhengque lijie li'an dengjizhi], June 1. People's Court Daily [Renmin Fayuan Bao]. http://tinyurl.com/nv4fmtl (accessed July 25, 2016).Google Scholar
Yap, Po Jen, and Lau, Holning, eds. 2010. Public Interest Litigation in Asia. London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Activist Lawyers in Post-Tiananmen China
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Activist Lawyers in Post-Tiananmen China
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Activist Lawyers in Post-Tiananmen China
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *