Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-kfj7r Total loading time: 0.495 Render date: 2022-12-03T07:14:10.979Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Accounting for the (Almost Complete) Failure of the Entrapment Defense in Post-9/11 US Terrorism Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2019

Abstract

Despite a number of compelling entrapment claims in post-9/11 US terrorism cases, these claims have nearly always failed. While previous research suggests possible reasons for this almost complete failure of the entrapment defense, no research has yet systematically examined the mechanisms responsible for this result. Drawing on thirty-seven interviews with individuals with in-depth knowledge of particular cases, as well as textual analysis of court decisions and quantitative analysis of a terrorism database, this article identifies several factors contributing to the entrapment defense’s failure. These include strategic choices by defendants to plead guilty or use other defenses, prosecutorial misconduct, evidence manipulation by informants and police, deficient entrapment doctrines, and procedural irregularities. Consistent with the general trend of counterterrorism law enhancing government power while reducing accountability, the multiple opportunities for authorities to manipulate the legal process leave defendants with little realistic chance of acquittal on entrapment grounds.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© 2019 American Bar Foundation 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aaronson, Trevor. The Terror Factory: Inside the FBI’s Manufactured War on Terrorism. New York: Ig Publishing, 2013.Google Scholar
Aaronson, Trevor. “The Sting: How the FBI Created a Terrorist.” The Intercept, Mar. 16, 2015. https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/03/16/howthefbicreatedaterrorist/.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Muneer I. “Resisting Guantanamo: Rights at the Brink of Dehumanization.” Northwestern University Law Review 103, no. 4 (2009): 16831763.Google Scholar
Akbar, Amna. “Policing ‘Radicalization.’UC Irvine Law Review 3, no. 4 (2013): 809–83.Google Scholar
Aref, Yassin. “Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Vacate His Convictions Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255.” 2013. Yassin Aref v. United States, Case No. 1:04-cr-402. http://www.projectsalam.org/documents/7-13_Aref%20Memo.pdf Google Scholar
Ashworth, Andrew, and Zedner, Lucia. Preventive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Associated Press. “FBI: Informant Close to Entrapping Would-Be Bomber.” Northwest Herald, Feb. 4, 2013. http://www.nwherald.com/2013/02/04/fbi-informant-close-to-entrapping-would-be-bomber/arutbne/.Google Scholar
Bach, Amy. Ordinary Injustice: How America Holds Court. New York: Metropolitan Books, 2010.Google Scholar
Banakar, Reza. Rights in Context: Law and Justice in Late Modern Society. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Benthall, Jonathan. “An Unholy Tangle: Boim versus the Holy Land Foundation.” UCLA Journal of Islamic & Near Eastern Law 10 (2010): 110.Google Scholar
BondGraham, Darwin. “Acquittal and Mistrial of Two Oakland Businessmen Accused of Rigging Federal Construction Contracts.” East Bay Express, Aug. 31, 2018. https://www.eastbayexpress.com/SevenDays/archives/2018/08/31/acquittal-and-mistrial-of-two-oakland-businessmen-accused-of-rigging-federal-construction-contracts.Google Scholar
Brent, John J., and Kraska, Peter B.. “Moving Beyond Our Methodological Default: A Case for Mixed Methods.” Journal of Criminal Justice Education 21, no. 4 (2010): 412–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, Fritz. “Jury Acquits Man of Felony Prostitution Charge.” The Journal (New Ulm, MN), Sept. 1, 2018. http://www.nujournal.com/news/local-news/2018/09/01/jury-acquits-man-of-felony-prostitution-charge/.Google Scholar
Chon, Margaret, and Arzt, Donna. “Walking While Muslim.” Law and Contemporary Problems 68, no. 2 (2005): 215–54.Google Scholar
Cuddemi, Jordan. “Jury Finds N.H. Man Not Guilty in Alleged Murder-for-Hire Case.” Valley News (Lebanon, NH), Sept. 12, 2017. https://www.vnews.com/Jury-Gets-Case-in-Temple-Trial-Newport-NH-14294558.Google Scholar
de Lint, Willem, and Kassa, Wondwossen. “Bent into Security: Barrister Contribution to a Skewed Order in Two Terrorism Prosecutions in Australia.” Journal of Law and Society 44, no. 2 (2017): 169–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolovich, Sharon. “Canons of Evasion in Constitutional Criminal Law.” In The New Criminal Justice Thinking, edited by Dolovich, Sharon and Natapoff, Alexandra, 111–54. New York: NYU Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Stephen, and Manley, Kathy. Inventing Terrorists: The Lawfare of Preemptive Prosecution. 2014. http://www.projectsalam.org/inventing-terrorists-study.pdf.Google Scholar
Dratel, Joshua L. “The Literal Third Way in Approaching ‘Material Support for Terrorism’: Whatever Happened to 18 U.S.C. § 2339B(C) and the Civil Injunctive Option?Wayne Law Review 57, no. 1 (2011): 7697.Google Scholar
Easton, Bill. “New York State’s Affirmative Defenses: Legitimate Tools for the Defense or Traps for the Unwary?” New York Criminal Defense, July 15, 2014. http://newyorkcriminaldefense.blogspot.com/2014/07/new-york-states-affirmative-defenses.html.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc. “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change.” Law & Society Review 9, no. 1 (1974): 95160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Barry, and Hartman, Jan. Rediscovering Grounded Theory. London: Sage, 2013.Google Scholar
Glaser, Jack. Suspect Race: Causes and Consequences of Racial Profiling. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godoy, Angelina. “Converging on the Poles: Contemporary Punishment and Democracy in Hemispheric Perspective.” Law & Social Inquiry 30, no. 3 (2005): 515–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Jon B., and Barclay, Scott. “Mind the Gap: the Place of Gap Studies in Sociolegal Scholarship.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8 (2012): 323–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajjar, Lisa. “Does Torture Work? A Sociolegal Assessment of the Practice in Historical and Global Perspective.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 5 (2009): 311–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Susan F. “Fear and Accountability at the End of an Era.” Law & Society Review 42, no. 3 (2008): 591604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Katherine. “Anatomy of a Terrorism Prosecution: Dr. Rafil Dhafir and the Help the Needy Muslim Charity Case.” National Lawyers Guild Review 68, no. 4 (2011): 234–46.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. Illusion of Justice: Human Rights Abuses in US Terrorism Prosecutions. 2014. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2014/07/21/illusion-justice-0.Google Scholar
Hussain, Murtaza, and Ghalayini, Razan. “Christie’s Conspiracy: The Real Story behind the Fort Dix Five Terror Plot.” The Intercept, June 25, 2015. https://theintercept.com/2015/06/25/fort-dix-five-terror-plot-the-real-story/.Google Scholar
Innocence Project. Prosecutorial Oversight: A National Dialogue in the Wake of Connick v. Thompson. 2011. https://www.innocenceproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/IP-Prosecutorial-Oversight-Report_09.pdf.Google Scholar
Jackson, Richard. “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse.” Government and Opposition 42, no. 3 (2007): 394426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Richard. “The Epistemological Crisis of Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 8, no. 1 (2015): 3354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khadr, Omar. “Defense Motion for Appropriate Relief.” United States v. Omar Khadr. 2010.Google Scholar
Koprowski, Agatha. “Islamaphobia, Neo-Orientalism, and the Specter of Jihad: Problems Facing Muslim Litigants in US Courts.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law & Social Change 14, no. 1 (2011): 183200.Google Scholar
Kovac, Joe. “Macon Man Acquitted in FBI-Led, Child-Sex Sting during 2015 Cherry Blossom Festival.” The Telegraph (Macon, GA), Aug. 3, 2018. https://www.macon.com/news/local/crime/article216041320.html Google Scholar
Kumar, Amitava. A Foreigner Carrying in the Crook of His Arm a Tiny Bomb. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundnani, Arun. “Radicalisation: the Journey of a Concept.” Race & Class 54, no. 2 (2012): 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundnani, Arun. The Muslims Are Coming!: Islamophobia, Extremism, and the Domestic War on Terror. London: Verso, 2014.Google Scholar
Laguardia, Francesca. “Terrorists, Informants, and Buffoons: The Case for Downward Departure as a Response to Entrapment.” Lewis & Clark Law Review 71, no. 1 (2013): 171214.Google Scholar
Laguardia, Francesca. “Imagining the Unimaginable: Torture and the Criminal Law.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 46, no. 3 (2014): 48102.Google Scholar
Lahav, Pnina. “Archetypal Trials and the Management of Dissent: Some Insights from Marketing Theory.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 4, no. 2 (2003): 763–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Jennifer. “Entrapment Evidence Lacking, Jurors Say.” N.Y. Times, May 25, 2006.Google Scholar
Lynch, Andrew, McGarrity, Nicola, and Williams, George. “The Emergence of a ‘Culture of Control.’” In Counter-Terrorism and Beyond: The Culture of Law and Justice after 9/11, edited by McGarrity, Nicola, Lynch, Andrew, and Williams, George, 310. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, Paul. The Entrapment Defense. Dayton: LexisNexis, 2015.Google Scholar
Margulies, Peter. “Guantanamo by Other Means: Conspiracy Prosecutions and Law Enforcement Dilemmas after September 11.” Gonzaga Law Review 43, no. 3 (2008): 513–57.Google Scholar
Marx, Gary T. Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
McAdams, Richard H. “Reforming Entrapment Doctrine in United States v. Hollingsworth .” University of Chicago Law Review 74 (2007): 17951812.Google Scholar
McCann, Michael. “The Unbearable Lightness of Rights: On Sociolegal Inquiry in the Global Era.” Law & Society Review 48, no. 2 (2014): 245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, Clark, and Moskalenko, Sophia. “Toward a Profile of Lone Wolf Terrorists: What Moves an Individual from Radical Opinion to Radical Action.” Terrorism and Political Violence 26, no. 1 (2014): 6985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, Jude, and Wilson, Dean. Pre-Crime, Pre-Emption, Pre-Caution and the Future. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
Mehozay, Yoav. “The Fluid Jurisprudence of Israel’s Emergency Powers: Legal Patchwork as a Governing Norm.” Law & Society Review 46, no. 1 (2012): 137–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Stephen A.The Case for Preserving the Outrageous Government Conduct Defense.” Northwestern University Law Review 91, no. 1 (1996): 305–73.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Colin. “Man Convicted of Environmental Terrorism Is Freed.” N.Y. Times, Jan. 8, 2015.Google Scholar
Natapoff, Alexandra. Snitching: Criminal Informants and the Erosion of American Justice. New York: NYU Press, 2009.Google Scholar
National Public Radio. “‘Newburgh Sting’: Terrorist Cell, or Group Sold on a Trap by FBI?” July 18, 2014. http://www.npr.org/2014/07/18/332636882/newburgh-sting-terrorist-cell-or-group-sold-on-a-trap-by-fbi.Google Scholar
Newman, Andy, Weiser, Benjamin, and Rashbaum, William. “Limo Company Owner in Crash Revealed as F.B.I. Informant, Recruiter of Terrorists, Fraudster.” N.Y. Times, Oct. 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Norris, Jesse J. “Why the FBI and the Courts Are Wrong about Entrapment and Terrorism.” Mississippi Law Journal 84, no. 5 (2015): 12571327.Google Scholar
Norris, Jesse J. “Entrapment and Terrorism on the Left: An Analysis of Post-9/11 Cases.” New Criminal Law Review 19, no. 2 (2016): 236–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Jesse J. “Another Form of American Exceptionalism? A Comparative Analysis of Terrorism Sting Operations in the US and Abroad.” Terrorism and Political Violence (2019a): 125. doi:10.1080/09546553.2019.1613984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Jesse J. “Explaining the Emergence of Entrapment in Post-9/11 Terrorism Investigations.” Critical Criminology (2019b): 117. doi:10.1007/s10612-019-09438-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Jesse J. “How Entrapment Still Matters: Partial Successes of Entrapment Claims in Terrorism Prosecutions.” In Bringing Rights to Life, edited by Sarat, Austin. Bingley, UK: Emerald, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Norris, Jesse J., and Grol-Prokopczyk, Hanna. “Estimating the Prevalence of Entrapment in Post-9/11 Terrorism Cases.” Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology 105, no. 3 (2015): 609777.Google Scholar
Norris, Jesse J., and Grol-Prokopczyk, Hanna. “Entrapment Allegations in Right-Wing Terrorism Cases: A Mixed-Methods Analysis.” International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 53 (2018a): 7788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Jesse J., and Grol-Prokopczyk, Hanna. “Temporal Trends in US Counterterrorism Sting Operations, 1989–2014.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 11, no. 2 (2018b): 243–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Jesse J., and Grol-Prokopczyk, Hanna. “Racial and Other Sociodemographic Disparities in Terrorism Sting Operations.” Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 5, no. 3 (2019): 416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. “U.S. Muslims Concerned about Their Place in Society, but Continue to Believe in the American Dream.” 2017. http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2017/07/25171611/U.S.-MUSLIMS-FULL-REPORT.pdf.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A., and Vermeule, Adrian. Terror in the Balance: Security, Liberty, and the Courts. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. Not a Suicide Pact: The Constitution in a Time of National Emergency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith. “Detention, the War on Terror, and the Federal Courts.” Columbia Law Review 110, no. 2 (2010): 579685.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent. “Entrapment and Equality in Terrorism Prosecutions: A Comparative Examination of North American and European Approaches.” Mississippi Law Journal 80, no. 4 (2011): 1455–90.Google Scholar
Rovner, Laura, and Theoharis, Jeanne. “Preferring Order to Justice.” American University Law Review 61, no. 5 (2012): 13311415.Google Scholar
Sageman, Marc. Misunderstanding Terrorism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Santillana, Joana. “Man Accused of Driving from SA to Laredo to Have Sex with Minor Found Not Guilty.” Laredo Morning Times, Dec. 31, 2018. https://www.lmtonline.com/news/article/Man-accused-of-driving-from-SA-to-Laredo-to-have-12517341.php.Google Scholar
Strawson, John. Law after Ground Zero. London: GlassHouse, 2004.Google Scholar
Said, Wadie E. “The Terrorist Informant.” Washington Law Review 85, no. 4 (2010): 687781.Google Scholar
Said, Wadie E. Crimes of Terror: The Legal and Political Implications of Federal Terrorism Prosecutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Clarke, Conor. “Beyond Discretion: Prosecution, the Logic of Sovereignty, and the Limits of Law.” Law & Social Inquiry 33, no. 2 (2008): 387416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, Stuart A. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, Jon. “‘A Person Otherwise Innocent’: Policing Entrapment in Preventative, Undercover Counterterrorism Investigations.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 11, no. 5 (2009): 14751510.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. The Faces of Injustice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990 Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Smith, Brent L., and Kelly, R. Damphousse. “Terrorism, Politics, and Punishment: A Test of Structural‐Contextual Theory and the ‘Liberation Hypothesis.’Criminology 36, no. 1 (1998): 6792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stampnitzky, Lisa. Disciplining Terror: How Experts Invented “Terrorism.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, Dru. “Entrapment by Numbers.” University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy 16, no. 1 (2005): 176.Google Scholar
Stillman, Sarah. “The Throwaways.” The New Yorker, Aug. 27, 2012. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/09/03/the-throwaways.Google Scholar
Szpunar, Piotr. “Premediating Predisposition: Informants, Entrapment, and Connectivity in Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 34, no. 4 (2017): 371–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tulich, Tamara. “‘Perverts’, ‘Terrorists’, and Business as Usual: Pether and Preventive Justice Scholarship.” Social & Legal Studies (2018): 119. doi:10.1177/0964663918779425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. “Critical Legal Theory (without Modifiers) in the United States.” Journal of Political Philosophy 13, no. 1 (2005): 99112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., Schulhofer, Stephen, and Huq, Aziz Z.. “Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans.” Law & Society Review 44, no. 2 (2010): 365402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdes, Stephen G. “Frequency and Success: An Empirical Study of Criminal Law Defenses, Federal Constitutional Evidentiary Claims, and Plea Negotiations.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153, no. 5 (2005): 17091814.Google Scholar
Waldman, Amy. “Prophetic Justice.” Atlantic, Oct. 1, 2006.Google Scholar
Weisselberg, Charles D. “Mourning Miranda.” California Law Review 96, no. 6 (2008): 15191601.Google Scholar
Welch, Michael. “Sovereign Impunity in America’s War on Terror: Examining Reconfigured Power and the Absence of Accountability.” Crime, Law and Social Change 47, no. 3 (2007): 135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

CASES CITED

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cour D’appel de Paris [Paris Court of Appeals], P. 7, 1st ch. instr., 27 Feb. 2014, nos. 2013/02604 and 2013/07319.Google Scholar
Hayes v. Ayers, 632 F.3d 500 (9th Cir. 2011).Google Scholar
Jacobson v. United States, 503 U.S. 540 (1992).Google Scholar
Regina v. Kearns, 2010 NICC [Northern Ireland Crown Court] 32.Google Scholar
Regina v. Nuttall, 2016 BCSC [British Columbia Supreme Court] 1404.Google Scholar
Regina v. Nuttall, 2018 BCCA [British Columbia Court of Appeals] 479.Google Scholar
Sherman v. United States, 356 U.S. 369 (1958).Google Scholar
United States v. Amawi, 695 F.3d 457, 483 (6th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
United States v. Aref, No. 04 CR 402, 2007 WL 603508 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 22, 2007).Google Scholar
United States v. Aref, 285 Fed. Appx. 784 (2008).Google Scholar
United States v. Bonanno, 852 F.2d 434, 437 (9th Cir. 1988).Google Scholar
United States v. Cromitie, Government Sentencing Memorandum, 2011 WL 2556081 (2011a).Google Scholar
United States v. Cromitie, 781 F. Supp. 2d 211, 221 (S.D.N.Y. 2011b).Google Scholar
United States v. Cromitie, 727 F.3d 194 (2nd Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
United States v. Hall, 608 F.3d 340, 343 (7th Cir. 2010).Google Scholar
United States v. Hayat, 710 F.3d 875 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
United States v. Hollingsworth, 27 F.3d 1196 (7th Cir. 1994).Google Scholar
United States v. Kabir, Case No. ED CR 12-00092-(B)-VAP (C.D. Cal. 2015).Google Scholar
United States v. Kurt, 532 F. App’x 723, 728 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
United States v. Mehanna, 735 F.3d 32 (1st Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
United States v. Mohamud, 666 F. App’x 591, 594 (9th Cir. 2016).Google Scholar
United States v. Olsen, 737 F.3d 625, 626 (9th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
United States v. Poehlman, 217 F. 3d 692, 704–05 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
United States v. Wright, 747 F.3d 399, 406 (6th Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
Vrchní soud v Praze [High Court in Prague], 10 To 3/2018 (27 March 2018).Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Accounting for the (Almost Complete) Failure of the Entrapment Defense in Post-9/11 US Terrorism Cases
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Accounting for the (Almost Complete) Failure of the Entrapment Defense in Post-9/11 US Terrorism Cases
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Accounting for the (Almost Complete) Failure of the Entrapment Defense in Post-9/11 US Terrorism Cases
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *