Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T00:45:13.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Latin America's Neocaudillismo: Ex-Presidents and Newcomers Running for President … and Winning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Javier Corrales
Javier Corrales*
Affiliation:
Amherst College. jcorrales@amherst.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Latin Americans have been voting for a surprisingly large number of ex-presidents and newcomers in presidential elections since the late 1980s. This article looks at both the demand and supply sides of this phenomenon by focusing on economic anxieties and party crises as the key independent variables. Sometimes the relationship between these variables is linear: economic anxieties combined with party crises lead to rising ex-presidents and newcomers. At other times the relationship is symbiotic: the rise of ex-presidents leads to party crises, economic and political anxieties, and thus the rise of newcomers. This article concludes that the abundance of ex-presidents and newcomers in elections—essentially, the new face of Latin America's caudillismo—does not bode well for democracy because it accelerates de-institutionalization and polarizes the electorate.

Type
Research
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , Fall 2008 , pp. 1 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, Alberto. 1994. Political Models of Macroeconomic Policy and Fiscal Reform. In Voting for Reform: Democracy, Political Liberalization and Economic Adjustment, ed. Haggard, Stephan and Webb, Steve B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 37–60.Google Scholar
Althoff, Adrian. 2005. How Ex-presidents Survive: the Cases of Hugo Banzer and Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozada in Bolivia. Mimeograph. Amherst College.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Públicos. 2004. Estudio Nacional de Opinión Pública no. 48. Santiago, Chile, December. <http://www.cepchile.cl>..>Google Scholar
Chevalier, François. 1962. “Caudillos” et “caciques” en Amérique: contribution à l'étude des liens personnels. Bulletin Hispanique 64: Mélanges offerts à Marcel Bataillon par les Hispanistes Français. 30–47.Google Scholar
Close, David, and Deonandan, Kalowatie, eds. 2004. Undoing Democracy: The Politics of Electoral Caudillismo. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2003. Popular Sovereignty versus Liberal Democracy in Venezuela. In Constructing Democratic Governance, ed. Diamond, Larry and Gunther, Richard. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 165–92.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier. 2003. Market Reforms. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 74–99.Google Scholar
Correa, Raquel. 2004. “Quiero ser protagonista del futuro de Chile.” Entrevista al ex-presidente Eduardo Frei. El Mercurio (Santiago), February 1.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wattenberg, Martin P.. 1993. The Not So Simple Act of Voting. In Political Science: The State of the Discipline, vol. II., ed. Finifter, A. W.. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association. 193–218.Google Scholar
Datum International. 2003. Estudio de opinión pública en la Gran Lima. Lima, August 18.Google Scholar
Domingo, Pilar. 2005. Democracy and New Social Forces in Bolivia. Social Forces 83, 4: 1727–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, Jorge I., and Kinney Giraldo, Jeanne. 1996. Conclusion: Parties, Institutions, and Market Reforms in Constructing Democracies. In Constructing Democratic Governance, ed. Domínguez, and Lowenthal, Abraham. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 3–41.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Edwards, Sebastian. 1995. Crisis and Reform in Latin America: From Despair to Hope. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Ellner, Steve. 1996. Political Party Factionalism and Democracy in Venezuela. Latin American Perspectives 23, 90: 87–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Richard. 2006. Nicaragua Elections: Too Close to Call. Latin Business Chronicle, October 16.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Richard, and Kurtz-Phelan, Daniel. 2006. Nicaragua between Caudillismo and Modernity: the Sandinistas Redux World Policy Journal 23, 2 (Summer): 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, Raquel, and Rodrik, Dani. 1991. Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty. American Economic Review 81, 5: 1146–55.Google Scholar
Freedom House. Various years. Freedom in the World, <http://www.freedomhouse.org> Accessed January 25, 2007.+Accessed+January+25,+2007.>Google Scholar
Gerring, John. 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gunther, Richard, Ramón Montero, José, and Torcal, Mariano. 2007. Democracy and Intermediation: Some Attitudinal and Behavioural Dimensions. In Democracy, Intermediation, and Voting in Four Continents, ed. Gunther, Montero, and Puhle, Hans-Jürgen. New York: Oxford University Press. 29–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 1998. Democracy and Political Representation in Latin America in the 1990s: Pause, Reorganization, or Decline? In Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America, ed. Agüero, Felipe and Stark, Jeffrey. Coral Gables: North-South Center Press. 99–143.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2005. Conclusions: Government Performance, Political Representation, and Public Perceptions of Contemporary Democracy in Latin America. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, and Mainwaring, Scott P.. New York: Cambridge University Press. 319–62.Google Scholar
Hamill, Hugh M. Jr., 1965. Introduction. In Dictatorship in Spanish America, ed. Hamill, . New York: Alfred A. Knopf. 3–25.Google Scholar
Hellinger, Daniel. 1999. Electoral and Party Politics. In Developments in Latin American Political Economy, ed. Buxton, Julia and Phillips, Nicola. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press. 49–71.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Solt, Fred. 2004. Successes and Failures of Neoliberalism. Latin American Research Review 39, 3: 150–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy J.. 2007. Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy, and the Brazilian Elections of 2006. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 1 (Spring): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel J. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kucynski, Pedro-Pablo. 1988. Latin American Debt. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Cameron, Maxwell A.. 2003. Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori's Peru. Latin American Politics and Society 45, 3 (Fall): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan. 1994. Presidential or Parliamentary Democracy: Does It Make a Difference? In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: Comparative Perspectives, ed. Linz, and Valenzuela, Arturo. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 3–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lora, Eduardo, and Panizza, Ugo. 2003. The Future of Structural Reform. Journal of Democracy 14, 2: 123–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrid, Raúl. 2005. Indigenous Voters and Party System Fragmentation in Latin America. Electoral Studies 24, 4 (December): 689–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott P. 2006a. The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes. Journal of Democracy 17: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott P. 2006b. State Deficiencies, Party Competition, and Confidence in Democratic Representation in the Andes. In The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes, ed. Mainwaring, Ana María Bejarano, and Pizarro Leongómez, Eduardo. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 295–345.Google Scholar
Mayorga, René Antonio. 2005. Bolivia's Democracy at the Crossroads. In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, ed. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott P.. New York: Cambridge University Press. 149–78.Google Scholar
Molina, José. 2000. Comportamiento electoral en Venezuela 1998–2000: cambio y continuidad. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales 6, 3: 45–68.Google Scholar
Payne, Mark J., Zovatto, Daniel G., Carrillo Flórez, Ferando, and Alla-mand, Andrés. 2002. Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Popkin, Samuel L. 1992. The Reasoning Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2007. Latin America's Populist Revival. SALS Review 27, 1 (Winter-Spring): 3–15.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth, and Wibbels, Erik. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: a Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93, 3: 575–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 1996. Understanding Economic Policy Reform. Journal of Economic Literature 34, 1: 9–41.Google Scholar
Sabatini, Christopher. 2003. Decentralization and Political Parties. Journal of Democracy 14, 2: 138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2008. Democracy Under Lula. In Constructing Democratic Governance, 3rd edition, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
San Martín, Nancy. 2006. Ortega's Old Guard Has Mostly Splintered. Miami Herald, December 14, 20A.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Plattner, Mark F., and Diamond, Larry, eds. 1999. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Reinner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selverston, Melina. 1997. The Unraveling of a Presidency. NACLA Report on the Americas 30, 6: 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheahan, John. 2002. Alternative Models of Capitalism in Latin America. In Models of Capitalism: Lessons for Latin America, ed. Huber, Evelyne. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 25–52.Google Scholar
Siavelis, Peter M., and Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America: a Framework for Analysis. Paper presented at the 25th International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, NV, October 6–8.Google Scholar
Silva, Rodrigo, and Guerra, Mónica. 2004. Senador vitalicio Eduardo Frei dice no ser candidato presidencial aun. El Mercurio (Santiago), October 18.Google Scholar
Singh, Anoop. 2006. Macroeconomic Volatility: The Policy Lessons from Latin America. Occasional Paper 06/166. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. July.Google Scholar
Singh, Anoop, Belaisch, Agnès, Collyns, Charles, De Masi, Paula, Krieger, Reva, Meredith, Guy, and Rennhack, Robert. 2005. Stabilization and Reform in Latin America: A Macroeconomic Perspective on the Experience Since the Early1990s. Occasional Paper 238. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturzenegger, Federico, and Zettelmeyer, Jeromin. 2007. Debt Default and Lessons from a Decade of Crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teitel, Simon, ed. 1992. Towards a New Development Strategy for Latin America: Pathways from Hirschman's Thought. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. 1980. Towards a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 2004. Latin American Presidencies Interrupted. Journal of Democracy 15, 4: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westhoff, Frank, and Corrales, Javier. 2008. Statistical Appendix for “Latin America's Neocaudillismo.” <https://cms.amherst.edu/users/C/jcorrales/forthcorning>..' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Westhoff,+Frank,+and+Corrales,+Javier.+2008.+Statistical+Appendix+for+“Latin+America's+Neocaudillismo.”+.>Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2002. The Politics of Market Reform in Fragile Democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru, and Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, John, and Kucynski, Pedro-Pablo, eds. 2003. After the Washington Consensus: Restarting Growth and Reform in Latin America. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2002. Globalization, Growth, and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Yáñez, Nelly. 2005. Ex presidente Frei se baja de la carrera por la presidencia. El Mercurio (Santiago), January 5.Google Scholar
Zettelmeyer, Jeromin. 2006. Growth and Reforms in Latin America: A Survey of Facts and Arguments. Working Paper 06/210. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. September.Google Scholar