Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T23:14:21.000Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Participation under Lula: Between Electoral Politics and Governability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Hernán F. Gómez Bruera
Hernán F. Gómez Bruera*
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas. hernanfgb@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article shows how and why the initial attempts of the Lula administration in Brazil to promote innovative counterhegemonic participatory strategies, such as those put in place by the PT in some of its subnational governments, fell by the wayside. It is argued that the implementation and scope of participatory initiatives under Lula were caught between electoral motivations and the need to secure governability. On the one hand, the need to produce quick results in order to maximize vote-seeking strategies hindered attempts to promote counterhegemonic participation, while Lula and his inner circle opted for policies that would score immediate marks with the poorest sectors or influence public opinion. On the other hand, participation also took a back seat because the PT concentrated most of its energies on reaching agreements with strategic actors, such as opposition parties or powerful economic groups.

Type
Research Article
Information
Latin American Politics and Society , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , Summer 2015 , pp. 1 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers, Rebecca. 1996. From Ideas to Practice: the Partido dos Trabalhadores and Participatory Governance in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives 23, 4: 35–54.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca. 2000. Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2002. Democracy and the Public Sphere in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2006. New Public Spheres in Brazil: Local Democracy and Deliberative Politics. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30, 3: 623–37.Google Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avritzer, Leonardo. 2010. Living under a Democracy: Participation and Its Impacts on the Living Conditions of the Poor. Latin American Research Review 45: 166–85.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2003. Radicals in Power: The Workers' Party (PT) and Experiments with Urban Democracy in Brazil. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2005. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baiocchi, Gianpaolo, and Checa, Sofia. 2007. The Brazilian Workers' Party: from Local Practices to National Power. Journal of Labor Society 10, 4: 411–30.Google Scholar
Balsadi, Octavio, Del Grossi, Mauro, and Takagi, Maya. 2004. O Programa Cartão Alimentação (Pca) em números: balanço de sua implementação e contribuições para as políticas sociais. Cadernos do CEAM 44, 14: 81–97.Google Scholar
Betto, Frei. 2007. Calendário do poder. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.Google Scholar
Bohn, Simone. 2011. Social Policy and Vote in Brazil: Bolsa Família and the Shifts in Lula's Electoral Base. Latin American Research Review 46, 1: 54–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camou, Antonio. 2001. Instituciones y gobernabilidad democrática en América Latina. In Los desafíos de la gobernabilidad, ed. Camou, . Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés. 15–60.Google Scholar
Coligação Lula Presidente (CLP). 2002. Programa de governo 2002, Pt, Ptb, PcdoB, Pl.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2001. Instituciones y gobernabilidad democrática en América Latina. In Los desafios de la gobernabilidad, ed. Camou, Antonio. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés. 211–40.Google Scholar
Couto, Cláudio. 2009. La participación irrelevante: una evaluación del gobierno de Lula. In La nueva izquierda en América Latina: derechos humanos, participación política y sociedad civil, ed. Armony, Ariel and Arnson, Cynthia. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. 247–70.Google Scholar
Doctor, Mahrukh 2007. Lula's Development Council: Neo-Corporatism and Policy Reform in Brazil. Latin American Perspectives 34, 6: 131–48.Google Scholar
Feres, Cláudia. 2010. Estado e organizações da sociedade civil no Brasil contemporâneo: construindo uma sinergia positiva. Revista de Sociologia e Política 18, 36: 187–204.Google Scholar
Fung, Archon, and Wright, Erik. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Gordillo, Gustavo, and Gómez, Hernán. 2005. Conversaciones sobre el hambre: Brasil y el derecho a la alimentación. Mexico City: CEDRSSA, Cámara de Diputados.Google Scholar
Grzybowski, Cândido. 2004. Cidadania encurralada. In Projeto MAPAS, relatório do projeto. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Análises Sociais e Econômicas.Google Scholar
Hahn, Lígia Helena. 2002. Possibilidades e limites da democracia deliberativa: a experiencia do orçamento participativo de Porto Alegre. Ph.D. diss., Facultade de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Heller, Patrick. 2001. Moving the State: the Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa and Porto Alegre. Politics and Society 29: 131–63.Google Scholar
Hernández, Esther. 2005. “Tensioning Democracy”: Participatory Budgeting in the Global City of São Paulo. Ph.D. diss., Department of Sociology, Brown University.Google Scholar
Hevia, Felipe. 2009. Mecanismos de participación ciudadana y control social en los programas de transferencia condicionada de renta en México y Brasil: un análisis comparado. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas 22, 2: 383–92.Google Scholar
Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Friedman, Elisabeth J.. 2008. Can Civil Society Organizations Solve the Crisis of Partisan Representation in Latin America? Latin American Politics and Society 50, 2 (Summer): 1–32.Google Scholar
Houtzager, Peter. 2008. The Silent Revolution in Anti-Poverty Programs: Minimum Income Guarantees in Brazil. IDS Bulletin 38, 6: 56–63.Google Scholar
Houtzager, Peter, and Dowbor, Monika. 2010. Social Sector Reform from the Middle: Reformist Professionals in the Metropolis of São Paulo, Brazil (1990–2008). Paper prepared for the 13th Basic Income Earth Network (BIEN) Congress, São Paulo, June 30–July 2.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil (1989–2009). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timohy J.. 2007. Rewarding Lula: Executive Power, Social Policy, and the Brazilian Elections of 2006. Latin American Politics and Society 49, 1 (Spring): 1–30.Google Scholar
Instituto Cidadania. 2001. Projecto Fome Zero: uma proposta de política de segurança alimentar para o Brasil. São Paulo: Instituto Cidadania.Google Scholar
Leite, Clovis Henrique. 2008. Partilha de poder decisório em procesos participativos nacionais. Master's thesis, Instituto de Ciencia Política, University of Brasília.Google Scholar
Licio, Elaine, Rennó, Lucio de O., and Carlos Castro, Henrique. 2009. Bolsa Família e voto na eleição presidencial de 2006: em busca do elo perdido. Opinião Pública 15, 1: 31–54.Google Scholar
Mayorga, Fernando, and Córdova, Eduardo. 2007. Gobernabilidad y gobernanza en América Latina. Working Paper Norte-Sur IP8. Geneva: Instituto Universitario de Estudios del Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Ministério de Desenvolvimento Social e Combate a Fome (MDS). 2005. Instruçao normativa no. 1 de mayo de 2005. http://www.mds.gov.br/arquivos/Instrucao...09-2005_5.../download. Accessed August 8, 2009.Google Scholar
Miraftab, Faranak. 2009. Insurgent Planning: Situating Radical Planning in the Global South. Planning Theory 8, 32: 32–50.Google Scholar
Moroni, José Antonio. 2009. O direito à participação no governo Lula. São Paulo: Abong (Brazilian Association of Non-Governmental Organizations). http://www2.abong.org.br/final/download/3_moroni.pdf. Accessed June 27, 2009.Google Scholar
Partido dos Trabalhadores (PT). 2004. Resoluções de encontros e congressos e programas de governo 1979–2002. CD-ROM. São Paulo: Diretório Nacional do PT, Fundação Perseu Abramo.Google Scholar
Pinto, Céli. 2004. Espaços deliberativos e a questão da representação. Revista Brasileira de Ciencias Sociais 19, 54: 97–113.Google Scholar
Pires, Jõao Marcus. 2006. O orçamento participativo na cidade de São Paulo: confrontos e enfrentamentos no circuito do poder. Master's thesis, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2011. Democratic Policymaking in Brazil: Participation as Representation. Paper presented at the 6th ECPR General Conference, Reykjavik.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2013. The Squared Circle of Participatory Democracy: Scaling up Deliberation to the National Level. Critical Policy Studies 7, 3: 219–41.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and Samuels, David. 2014. The Impact of Participatory Democracy: Evidence from Brazil's National Public Policy Conferences. Comparative Politics 46, 3 (April): 313–32.Google Scholar
Pogrebinschi, Thamy, and Santos, Fabiano. 2010. Entre representação e participação: as conferěncias nacionais e o experimentalismo democrático brasileiro. Projeto Pensando o Direito. Brasília: Ministério da Justiça.Google Scholar
Poletto, Ivo. 2005. Brasil: oportunidades perdidas. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond.Google Scholar
Presiděncia da República (PR). Secretaria de Comunicação Social. 2010. Caderno destaques: ações e programas do governo federal. Brasília: Secretaria de Comunicação Social.Google Scholar
Ramos, Denise 2003. Democracia semidireta no Brasil pós-1988: a experiěncia do orçamento participativo. Ph.D. diss., Faculty of Law, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2008. Brazil: Democracy Under Lula and the PT. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2013. Brazil: Democracy in the PT Era. In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, ed. Domínguez, Jorge I. and Shifter, Michael. 4th ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 214–35.Google Scholar
Schönleitner, Günter. 2006. Between Liberal and Participatory Democracy: Tensions and Dilemmas of Leftist Politics in Brazil. Journal of Latin American Studies 38: 35–63.Google Scholar
Schneider, Aaron, and Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2002. Budgets and Ballots in Brazil: Participatory Budgeting from the City to the State. IDS Working Paper 149. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
Shankland, Alexander. 2010. Speaking for the People: Representation and Health Policy in the Brazilian Amazon. Ph.D. diss., Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Shankland, Alexander, and Cornwall, Andrea. 2007. Realizing Health Rights in Brazil: The Micropolitics of Sustaining Health System Reform. In Development Success: Statecraft in the South, ed. Bebbington, Anthony and McCourt, Willy. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 163–88.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 1998. Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: toward a Redistributive Democracy. Politics and Society 26, 4: 461–510.Google Scholar
Sousa Santos, Boaventura de. 2002. Orçamento participativo em Porto Alegre: para uma democracia distributiva. In Democratizar a democracia, ed. Santos, . Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.Google Scholar
Takagi, Maya. 2006. A implantação da política de segurança alimentar e nutricional no Brasil: seus limites e desafios. Ph.D. diss., Instituto de Economia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Ana Cláudia, ed. 2005. Os sentidos da democracia e da participação. Vol. 47. São Paulo: Polis.Google Scholar
Tomassini, Luciano. 1993. Estado y gobernabilidad. La reforma del estado y las políticas públicas. Santiago: Centro de Análisis de Políticas Públicas.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian. 2008. When Does Participatory Democracy Deepen Democracy? Lessons from Brazil. Comparative Politics 41, 1: 61–82.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian, and Avritzer, Leonardo. 2004. Participatory Publics: Civil Society and New Institutions. Comparative Politics 36, 3: 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, Sarah. 1996. Depoliticising Development: the Uses and Abuses of Participation. Development in Practice 6, 1: 6–15.Google Scholar
Zucco, Cesar Jr. 2006. A governabilidade num segundo governo Lula. Paper presented at the 1° Encuentro de la Asociación de Ciencia Política del Uruguay, Montevideo.Google Scholar