Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:03:24.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Theoretical modeling of electromagnetically imploded plasma liners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

N. F. Roderick
Affiliation:
Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
B. J. Kohn
Affiliation:
Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
W. F. McCullough
Affiliation:
Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
C. W. Beason
Affiliation:
Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
J. A. Lupo
Affiliation:
Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
J. D. Letterio
Affiliation:
Air Force Weapons Laboratory, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico 87117
D. A. Kloc
Affiliation:
United States Air Force Academy, Colorado 80840
T. W. Hussey
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

Abstract

The generation of high-energy-density plasmas by the electromagnetic implosion of cylindrical foils (i.e., imploding plasma shells or hollow z-pinches) has been explored analytically and through numerical simulation. These theoretical investigations have been performed for a variety of foil initial conditions (radius, height, and foil mass) for both capacitive and inductive pulsed power systems. The development of the theoretical modeling techniques is presented, covering both circuit models and plasma load models. The circuit models include simple single loop capacitive and multiple loop inductive systems. These circuits are coupled to the imploding plasma loads whose response has been studied by models ranging from simple time varying inductances to complex two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic numerical simulations. Results from a series of configurations are given, showing the development of modelling techniques used to study the dynamics of the plasma implosion process and the role of instabilities. Interaction between analytic techniques and detailed numerical simulation has led to improvement in all theoretical modeling techniques presently used to study the implosion process. Comparisons of implosion times, shell structure, instability growth rates, and thermalization times have shown good agreement between analytic/heuristic techniques and more detailed two dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations. These in turn have provided excellent agreement with experimental results for both capacitor and inductor pulse power systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baker, W. L., Clark, M. C., Degnan, J. H., Kiuttu, G. F., McClenahan, C. R. & Reinovsky, R. E. 1978 J.A.P. 49, 4694.Google Scholar
Braginski, S. J. 1965 Reviews of Plasma Physics (ed Leontovich, M. A.) New York: Consultants Bureau.Google Scholar
Caird, R. S. & Turchi, P. J. 1975 Air Force Weapons Laboratory Technical Report, AFWL-TR-74-222, April unpublished.Google Scholar
Clark, W., 1979 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 24, 1053.Google Scholar
Degnan, J. H., Sand, R. J., Kiuttu, G. F. & Woodall, D. M. 1981 Low Energy X-Ray Diagnostics p. 264American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar
Frese, M. private communication.Google Scholar
Hasegawa, A. 1975 Plasma Instabilities and Nonlinear Effects, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, W., Roderick, N. F. & Kloc, D. A. 1982 J.A.P. 3, 1452.Google Scholar
Hussey, T. W. & McDaniel, D. H. 1981 Comments in Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, 6, 177.Google Scholar
Hussey, T. W. & Roderick, N. F. 1981 Phys. Fluids, 24, 1384.Google Scholar
Hussey, T. W. & Baker, L. 1981 IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science 65.Google Scholar
Jahn, R. W. 1968 Physics of Electromagnetic Propulsion McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kloc, D. W., Roderick, N. F. & Hussey, T. W. 1982 J.A.P. to be published.Google Scholar
Reinovsky, R. W., Degnan, J. H., Kiuttu, G. F., Nuttleman, R. A. & Baker, W. L. 1980 Mega gauss Physics and Technology (ed Turchi, P. J.) Plenum.Google Scholar
Reinovsky, R. E., Smith, D. L., Baker, W. L., Degnan, J. H., Henderson, R. P., Kohn, B.J., Kloc, D. A. & Roderick, N. F. 1982 IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 10, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtmeyer, R. D. & Morton, K. W. 1967 Difference Methods For Initial Value Problems 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Roderick, N. F., Hussey, J. W., Faehl, R. S. & Boyd, R. W. 1978 App. Phys. Lett. 35, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagjoev, R. Z. 1974 Advances in Plasma Physics (ed Simon, A. and Thompson, W. B.) Vol. 5 Wiley.Google Scholar
Spitzer, L. Jr. 1956 Physics of Fully Ionized Gases Interscience.Google Scholar
Steinberg, D. J. 1966 University of California, Livermore, Report, no. UCRL 14931 (unpublished).Google Scholar
Turchi, P. J. & Baker, W. L. 1973 J.A.P. 44, 4936.Google Scholar