Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T11:19:08.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Simple 2D Model for Helical Flux-compression Generators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

B.M. Novac ,
M.C. Enache ,
I.R. Smith ,
M.C. Enache  and
H.R. Stewardson
B.M. Novac
Affiliation:
Institute of Atomic Physics, IFTAR, Bucharest, Romania
M.C. Enache
Affiliation:
Institute of Atomic Physics, IFTAR, Bucharest, Romania
I.R. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LEI 1 3TU, UK
H.R. Stewardson
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LEI 1 3TU, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents a simple but complete 2D model for helical flux-compression generators that overcomes many of the limitations present in existing zero-dimensional models. The generator circuit is effectively decomposed into separate z and; current carrying circuits, with each of the; circuits (rings) corresponding to a different current. Use is also made of a technique by which these rings are sequentially switched out of circuit. The approach proposed opens the way to a full understanding of the behavior of cascade systems of generators inductively coupled by dynamic transformers using the so-called flux-trapping technique. In addition, the model can also yield an important insight into the phenomena that differentiates the performance of small generators when primed by a capacitor, a battery, or an externally produced magnetic field. Finally, the numerical code developed in the paper can readily be adapted to model high-energy and high-current generators in which the helical coil and the armature are of variable geometry. Valuable design information is provided on the magnetic and the electric field distributions within the generator and on the likely radial and axial movements of the stator turns.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 379 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, R.J. 1989 Pulse power formulary. North Star Res Corp.Google Scholar
Brooker, C.J. et al. 1994 Megagauss Magnetic Field Generation and Pulsed Power Applications, Cowan, M. and Spielman, R.B., eds. (Nova Science Pub., New York), pp. 511–517.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, V.K. & Davydov, V.A. 1980 Megagauss Physics and Technology, Turchi, P.J., ed. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 651–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshev, V.K. et al. 1990 Megagauss Fields and Pulse Power Systems, Titov, V.M. and Shretsov, G. A., eds. (Nova Science Pub., New York), pp. 367–370.Google Scholar
Cowan, M. & Kaye, R.J. 1984 Ultrahigh Magnetic Fields: Physics. Techniques. Applications, Titov, V.M. and Shvetsov, G.A., eds. (Nauka, Moscow), pp. 241–245.Google Scholar
Felber, F.S. et al. 1984 Ultra High Magnetic Fields: Physics. Techniques. Applications, Titov, V.M. and Shvetsov, G.A., eds. (Nauka, Moscow), pp. 321–329.Google Scholar
Fowler, C.M. & Caird, R.S. 1989 Proc. 7th IEEE Pulsed Power Conf., pp. 475–478.Google Scholar
Fowler, C.M. et al. 1975 Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Report LA-5890-MS.Google Scholar
Freeman, J.R. & Thompson, S.L. 1977 J. Computational Phys. 25(4), 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grover, F.W. 1973 Inductance Calculations. (Dover, New York).Google Scholar
Grover, J.E. et al. 1980 Megagauss Physics and Technology, Turchi, P.J., ed. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalantarov, P.L. & Teitlin, L.A. 1958 Inductance Calculations. (Tehnica, Bucharest).Google Scholar
Lindemuth, I.R. et al. 1985 J. Appl. Phys. 57, 4447–4460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. et al. 1987 Megagauss Technology and Puked Power Applications, Fowler, C.M., Caird, R.S., and Erickson, D.J., eds. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 593–607.Google Scholar
McGlaun, J.M. et al. 1980 Megagauss Physics and Technology, Turchi, P.J., ed. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, N. & Chikazumi, S. 1979 J. Appl. Phys. 18(3), 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novac, B.M. et al. 1995 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 28, 807–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Press, W.H. et al. 1989 Numerical Recipes in Pascal: The Art of Scientific Computing. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Smith, J.R. et al. 1995 Power Eng. J. 9(2), 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tipton, R.E. 1987 Megagauss Physics and Technology, Fowler, C.M., Caird, R.J., and Erikson, D.J., eds. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
Tucker, T.J. 1980 Megagauss Physics and Technology, Turchi, P.J., ed. (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar