Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:28:41.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Equation of state information from beam-target interaction experiments at KALIF

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

Balbir Goel  and
Oleg Yu. Vorobiev
Balbir Goel
Affiliation:
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Postfach 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Oleg Yu. Vorobiev
Affiliation:
Institute of Chemical Physics, Chernogolovka, Russia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intense ion beams can be used to generate ultrahigh pressures in condensed matter. Lightion beams generated at the Karlsruhe Light Ion Facility (KALIF) typically have a focus of less than 1-cm diameter. The maximum power density at KALIF achieved so far is of the order of 1 TW/cm2. In the energy deposition zone of the targets, the 1.5-MeV protons of the KALIF beam deposit energy of the order of 100 TW/g or 5 MJ/g. A strongly coupled, hot, dense plasma is thus created by the action of a light ion beam on matter. The high pressure generated in this region has been used to accelerate thin foils to velocities up to 12.5 km/s. A successful interpretation of these experiments can serve as a check of theoretical models and of the equation of state (EOS) data. The present paper contains an investigation of the hydrodynamics of thin aluminum foil accelerated by light ion beams at KALIF using Bθ0-diode. The peak power density in these experiments was 0.15 ± 0.05 TW/cm2. The results of simulations depend mainly on two factors: power density evolution at the target and the EOS for the strongly coupled dense and hot plasma. The beam power density evolution has been carefully remeasured recently. It turned out that the available EOS data do not reproduce experimental results satisfactorily. We have formulated a simple EOS formula in a modified Mie-Grüneisen form. We assume the Grüneisen parameter to be a function of temperature and density. The parameters of this EOS have been adjusted to reproduce experiments at KALIF. In the present paper analysis of beam-target interaction experiments at KALIF is presented using our analytic EOS. We show that such experiments can give information on EOS data in the region of strongly coupled plasma.

Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 637 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakanova, A.A. et al. 1983 Prikladnaja Matematika i Technicheskaja Phisika (in Russian) 2, 76.Google Scholar
Baumung, K. et al. 1992 In Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. High-Power Par. Beams, Vol. I, Mosher, D. and Cooperstein, G., eds., (NTIS, Springfield, VA), p. 68.Google Scholar
Baumung, K. et al. 1993 Nuovo Cimento 106A, 1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bluhm, H. et al. 1992 In Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. High-Power Par. Beams, Vol. I, Mosher, D. and Cooperstein, G., eds., (NTIS, Springfield, VA), p. 51.Google Scholar
Bushman, A.V. et al. 1988 Thermal Physics and Dynamics of Intense Pulse Action (Inst. of Chemical Physics, Chernogolovca). (Translation published by Taylor & Francis, Washington in 1993 under the title Intense Dynamic Loading of Condensed Matter.)Google Scholar
Bushman, A.V. et al. 1989 In Proc. Enrico Fermi School 1989 (Elsevier, New York), p. 249.Google Scholar
Ebeling, W. et al. 1991 Thermophysical Properties of Hot Dense Plasmas (Teubner-Texte zur Physik, Stuttgart-Leipzig).Google Scholar
Eliezer, S. et al. 1986 An Introduction to Equation of State (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Fortov, V.E. et al. 1991 J. Appl. Phys. 70, 4524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glushak, B.L. et al. 1989 JETP 96, 1301.Google Scholar
Godunov, S.K. 1959 Mat. Sbornik 47, 271.Google Scholar
Goel, B. & Bluhm, H. 1988 J. de Physique 49, C7–169.Google Scholar
Goel, B. et al. 1992 In Proc. Ninth Int. Conf. on High-Power Particle Beams, Vol. II, Mosher, D. and Cooperstein, G., eds., (NTIS, Springfield, VA), p. 957.Google Scholar
Hoppé, P. et al. 1995 Annual Report 1994, Report FZKA 5590, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Piriz, A.R. 1988 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion 30, 793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polyshchuk, A.Ya. et al. 1991 Sov. J. Plasma Phys. 17, 523.Google Scholar
Segletes, S.B. 1995 Computational Mechanics '95, Vol. 2, Atluri, S.N. et al. , eds., (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 1691–1696.Google Scholar
Sesame, Library. 1982 Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Report UCID-118574–82–2.Google Scholar
Tsakiris, G.D. & Eidmann, K. 1987 JQSRT 38, 353.Google Scholar
Van Leer, B. 1978 J. Compt. Phys. 32, 101.Google Scholar
Vorobiev, O.Yu. et al. 1994 Report KfK5299.Google Scholar
Zel'dovich, Ya.B. & Raizer, Yu.P. 1967 Physics of Shock Waves (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar