Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T07:45:49.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conducting versus insulating walls in a heavy ion reaction chamber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2003

J.-L. VAY
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
S. KAWATA
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Environment Sciences, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan
T. NAKAMURA
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Environment Sciences, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan
J. SASAKI
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Environment Sciences, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan
T. SOMEYA
Affiliation:
Department of Energy and Environment Sciences, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan
C. DEUTSCH
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Nuclear Reactors, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan Present address: LPGP, Bât. 21, UPS, 91405 Orsay, France

Abstract

We first pay attention to the inflight charge state distribution in a Pb ion beam propagating in a reactor-sized chamber delimited by metallic walls. We thus compare Livermore (code BIC) and Orsay (code BPIC) distributions in the presence of a residual Flibe gas pressure. Next, we replace the electron plasma due to Flibe ionization by a gliding plasma produced by the polarization of the incoming ion beam on insulating walls. Corresponding electrons, when attracted by the beam, are demonstrated to yield a very efficient current neutralization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)