Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:38:59.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spanish language use and attitudes: A study of two New York City communities1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Ofelia García ,
Isabel Evangelista ,
Mabel Martínez ,
Carmen Disla  and
Bonifacio Paulino
Ofelia García
Affiliation:
School of Education, The City College of New York
Isabel Evangelista
Affiliation:
School of Education, The City College of New York
Mabel Martínez
Affiliation:
School of Education, The City College of New York
Carmen Disla
Affiliation:
School of Education, The City College of New York
Bonifacio Paulino
Affiliation:
School of Education, The City College of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article presents the results of a comparative study of two Hispanic communities in New York City: Washington Heights and Elmhurst/Corona. Our data on language proficiency, language use, and attitudes were gathered using a sociolinguistic questionnaire. However, the study benefited from the interactive process established between the researchers and the communities which they studied and in which they live and work.

Our data are analyzed along three dimensions. First, we compare data for the two Spanish-speaking communities. We discuss how the social status and the ethnic configuration of the community affect linguistic and attitudinal behaviors. Then, we analyze the data according to national origin. We discuss how the five nationality groups included in our study – Central Americans, Cubans, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, and South Americans – differ in language proficiency, language use, and language attitudes. Finally, we compare the data for Dominicans in Washington Heights to that of Dominicans in Elmhurst/Corona. We examine how national origin and the language surround of the ethnic community interact in order to determine language use and attitudes. Some of the findings here differ from what may be supposed of such cases.

We suggest socioeducational and language policies for Hispanics in the United States based on the results of this study. (Sociology of language, sociolinguistics, language planning, ethnic studies, sociology, education of language minorities, language education, Central American, Cuban, Dominican, Puerto Rican, South American Spanish in New York City)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , December 1988 , pp. 475 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aguirre, A. (1982). Language use patterns of adolescent Chicanos in a California border town. In Barkin, F., Brandt, E., & Ornstein-Galicia, J. (eds.), Bilingualism and language contact: Spanish, English, and Native American Languages. New York: Teachers College. 278–89.Google Scholar
Aguirre, A. (ed.) (1985). Language use in the Chicane speech community. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 53:5–128.Google Scholar
Amastae, J. (1982). Language shift and maintenance in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Southern Texas. In Barkin, F., Brandt, E., & Ornstein-Galicia, J. (eds.), Bilingualism and language contact: Spanish, English, and Native American languages. New York: Teachers College. 261–77.Google Scholar
Attinasi, J. (1979). Language attitudes in a New York Puerto Rican community. In Padilla, R. V. (ed.), Bilingual education and public policy in the United States. Ypsilanti: Eastern Michigan University. 408–60.Google Scholar
Attinasi, J. (1985). Hispanic attitudes in northwest Indiana and New York. In Elías-Olivares, L. et al. (eds.), Spanish language use and public life in the USA. Berlin: Mouton. 27–58.Google Scholar
Blum, H. (1979). Illegal aliens in New York: A life of fear, costly to all. New York Times, March 18.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Puertorriqueños (1982). Intergenerational perspectives on bilingualism: From community to classroom. Language Policy Task Force, New York.Google Scholar
Centro de Estudios Puertorriqueños (1988). Speech and ways of speaking in a bilingual Puerto Rican community. Language Policy Task Force, New York.Google Scholar
Cole, S. (1983). Attitudes towards bilingual education among Hispanics and a nationwide sample. Center for the Social Sciences at Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
Community Board No. 4 Portfolio (1984). Newsletter. New York.Google Scholar
Community Profile 12 (1983). The Presbyterian Hospital. Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York.Google Scholar
Cruz, J. S. (1977). Study of Puerto Rican, Mexican and Cuban parents' views on bilingual/bicultural education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Elías-Olivares, L. (1976). Ways of speaking in a Chicano community: A sociolinguistic approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Fernández, L. (1984). Dominicanos de N. Y. en busca de su destino. El Diario-La Prensa, February 15.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A., Cooper, R. L., & Ma, R. (1971). Bilingualism in the barrio. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Flores, J., Attinasi, J., & Pedraza, P. (1981). La carreta made a U-tum: Puerto Rican language and culture in the United States. Daedalus Spring: 193–217.Google Scholar
García, O., & Otheguy, R. (1985). The masters of survival send their children to school: Bilingual education in the ethnic schools of Miami. Bilingual Review/Revista Bilingue 12(1–2):3–43.Google Scholar
Georges, L. (1984). New immigrants and the political process: Dominicans in New York. Occasional Papers 45. New York: New York University.Google Scholar
Kleiman, D. (1982). A surge of immigrants alters New York's face. New York Times, September 27.Google Scholar
Llanes, J. (1982). Cuban-Americans. Masters of survival. Cambridge, Mass.: ABT Books.Google Scholar
NCEP. National Commission for Employment Policy (1982). Hispanics and Jobs: Barriers to Progress. (Report No. 14, September.) Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Otheguy, R., & García, O. (1988). Diffusion of lexical innovations in the Spanish of Cuban Americans. In Ornstein-Galicia, J., Green, G. K., & Bixler-Marquez, D. J. (eds.), Research issues and problems in United States Spanish. (Rio Grande Series in Language and Linguistics No. 2.) Brownsville, Tex.: Pan American University.Google Scholar
Pedraza, P. (1987). An ethnographic analysis of language use in the Puerto Rican community of East Harlem. Centro de Estudios Puertorriqueños Working Paper Series 12, New York.Google Scholar
Population Census, STF2, 1980. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Pousada, A. (1987). Puerto Rican community participation in East Harlem bilingual programs. Centro de Estudios Puertorriqueños Working Paper Series 11, New York.Google Scholar
Ryan, E. B., & Carranza, M. (1977). Ingroup and outgroup reactions toward Mexican American language varieties. In Giles, H. (ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic. 59–82.Google Scholar
Sanchez, R. (1983). Chicano discourse: Socio-historic perspectives. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury.Google Scholar
Solé, C. A. (1980). Language usage patterns among a young generation of Cuban-Americans. In Blansitt, E. L. & Teschner, R. V. (eds.), Festschrift for Jacob Ornstein. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury. 274–81.Google Scholar
Solé, C. A. (1982). Language loyalty and language attitudes among Cuban-Americans. In Fishman, J. & Keller, G. (eds.), Bilingual education for Hispanic students in the United States. New York: Teachers College Press. 254–68.Google Scholar
Solé, Y. (1977). Language attitudes toward Spanish among Mexican American college students. Journal of LASSO 2:37–46.Google Scholar
Zentella, A. C. (1981). Language variety among Puerto Ricans. In Ferguson, C. A. & Heath, S. B. (eds.), Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 218–38.Google Scholar