Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-vbn2q Total loading time: 0.219 Render date: 2021-07-30T14:56:42.863Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Normativity, power, and agency: On the chronotopic organization of orthographic conventions on social media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2021

Taraneh Sanei
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This article examines Iranian social media users’ understandings of normative behavior by focusing on a new online ‘nonstandard’ orthographic norm: the ‘hekasreh’. Adopting a chronotopic approach to the study of discourse, I analyze Iranian Twitter users’ social positionings towards the ‘hekasreh’ phenomenon. I show how tweeters invoke different spatiotemporal configurations, and the normative behaviors associated with them, to argue for and/or against this new orthographic norm. Focusing on the argumentative dynamics of the invoked chronotopes, I investigate the agentive and creative ways in which power is claimed and maintained in online spaces. This study, on the one hand, provides more empirical data to highlight the significance of attending to the online-offline nexus, and on the other hand argues for a more dynamic conceptualization of the interaction between normativity, power, and agency in online communication. (Social media, Farsi/Persian orthography, sociolinguistic normativity, chronotope, power, agency)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to extend my deepest gratitude to Rakesh Bhatt and Lydia Catedral whose academic guidance and support made this project possible. Moreover, I am especially grateful to Farzad Karimzad for all of his insightful comments and professional help in every stage of this project. I would like to also thank my colleagues in the Language and Society Discussion (LSD) group at the University of Illinois for their interest in and engaging discussions about the article. Finally, I appreciate the anonymous reviewers and the editors of Language in Society for their helpful comments which led to an improved version of this article.

References

Agha, Asif (2005). Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):3859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication 27(3):320–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Althusser, Louis (2006). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes towards an investigation). In Sharma, Aradhana & Gupta, Akhil (eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader, 8698. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2006). Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4):419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism 19(2):185205.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1981). The dialogical imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baluch, Bahman (2006). Persian orthography and its relation to literacy. In Malatesha Joshi, R. & Aaron, P. G. (eds.), Handbook of orthography and literacy, 365–76. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barton, David, & Lee, Carmen (2013). Language online: Investigating digital texts and practices. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2003). Commentary: A sociolinguistics of globalization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4):607–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2015). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology 44:105–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2017). Commentary: Mobility, contexts, and the chronotope. Language in Society 46(1):9599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2018). Durkheim and the internet: On sociolinguistics and the sociological imagination. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan (2019). Constructing and consolidating chronotopes. Discussant's notes, panel on mobility, marginality and meaning: A chronotopic approach, organized by Lydia Catedral & Farzad Karimzad, IPrA Conference, Hong Kong, June 2019.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, & De Fina, Anna (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the timespace organization of who we are. In Fina, Anna De & Wegner, Jeremy (eds.), Diversity and super-diversity, 114. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan; Helen Kelly-Holmes, ; Pia Lane, Sirpa Leppänen, Máiréad Moriarty, Sari Pietikäinen, Arja Piirainen-Marsh, (2009). Media, multilingualism and language policing: An introduction. Language Policy 8(3):203207.Google Scholar
danah, boyd (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Zizi Papacharissi (ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, 3958. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
danah, boyd (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bozorgmehr, Mehdi, & Moeini Meybodi, Maryam (2016). The Persian paradox: Language use and maintenance among Iranian Americans. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2016(237):99118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7(4–5):585614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catedral, Lydia (2018). Discursive scaling: Moral stability and neoliberal dominance in the narratives of transnational migrant women. Discourse & Society 29(1):2342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiluwa, Innocent, & Ifukor, Presley (2015). ‘War against our children’: Stance and evaluation in #BringBackOurGirls campaign discourse on Twitter and Facebook. Discourse & Society 26(3):267–96.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas (2010). Introduction: Sociolinguistics in the global era. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), The handbook of language and globalization, 127. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, Anna, & Perrino, Sabina (2013). Transnational identities. Applied Linguistics 34(5):509–15.Google Scholar
Dick, Hillary P. (2010). Imagined lives and modernist chronotopes in Mexican nonmigrant discourse. American Ethnologist 37(2):275–90.Google Scholar
Hall, Kira (2014). Hypersubjectivity: Language, anxiety, and indexical dissonance in globalization. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 24(2):261–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, Monica (2003). Globalization, the new economy, and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(4):473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoarau, Didier (Producer), & Morel, Pierre (Director) (2008). Taken [Motion picture]. United States/France: EuropaCorp.Google Scholar
Honari, Ali (2015). Online social research in Iran: A need to offer a bigger picture. CyberOrient: The Online Journal of Virtual Middle East 9(2). Online: https://cyberorient.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2015/11/CyberOrient_Vol_9_Iss_2_Honari.pdf.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 3583. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan (2009). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader, 402–34. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacquemet, Marco (2005). Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization. Language & Communication 25(3):257–77.Google Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad (2016). Life here beyond now: Chronotopes of the ideal life among Iranian transnationals. Journal of Sociolinguistics 20(5):607–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad (2018). Optimal choices: Azeri multilingualism in indigenous and diaspora contexts. International Journal of Bilingualism 22(2):141–58.Google Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad (2020). Metapragmatics of normalcy: Mobility, context, and language choice. Language & Communication 70:107–118.Google Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad (2021). Multilingualism, chronotopes, and resolutions: Towards an analysis of the total sociolinguistic fact. Applied Linguistics. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa053.Google Scholar
Karimzad, Farzad, & Catedral, Lydia (2018). ‘No, we don't mix languages’: Ideological power and the chronotopic organization of ethnolinguistic identities. Language in Society 47(1):89113.Google Scholar
Kia, Mehrdad (1998). Persian nationalism and the campaign for language purification. Middle Eastern Studies 34(2):936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrebæk, Martha Sif, & Ghandchi, Narges (2015). ‘Pure’ Farsi and political sensitivities: Language and ideologies in Farsi complementary language classrooms in Denmark. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(1):6290.Google Scholar
Knobel, Michele, & Lankshear, Colin (2007). Online memes, affinities, and cultural production. In Knobel, Michele & Lankshear, Colin (eds.), A new literacies sampler, 199227. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Koven, Michele (2013). Antiracist, modern selves and racist, unmodern others: Chronotopes of modernity in Luso-descendants’ race talk. Language & Communication 33(4):544–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard, & Yamakido, Hiroko (2008). Ezafe and the deep position of nominal modifiers. In McNally, Louise & Kennedy, Christopher (eds.),Adjectives and adverbs: Syntax, semantics, and discourse, 4370. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa (2009). Playing with and policing language use and textuality in fan fiction. In Hotz-Davies, Ingrid, Kirchhofer, Anton, & Leppänen, Sirpa (eds.), Internet fictions, 6283. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Leppänen, Sirpa, & Peuronen, Saija (2012). Multilingualism on the internet. In Martin-Jones, Marilyn, Blackledge, Adrian, & Creese, Angela (eds.), The Routledge handbook of multilingualism, 384402. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levinson, Martin H. (2011). Mapping the Persian Gulf naming dispute. ETC: A Review of General Semantics 68(3):279–87.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lyons, Agnieszka, & Tagg, Caroline (2019). The discursive construction of mobile chronotopes in mobile-phone messaging. Language in Society 48(5):657–83. doi: 10.1017/S004740451900023X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Joseph, & Lo, Adrienne (2012). Transnational South Korea as a site for a sociolinguistics of globalization: Markets, timescales, neoliberalism. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(2):147–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, Alastair (2010). Popular cultures, popular languages, and global identities. In Coupland, Nikolas (ed.), The handbook of language and globalization, 592607. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Procházka, Ondřej (2018). A chronotopic approach to identity performance in a Facebook meme page. Discourse, Context & Media 25:7887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebba, Mark (1998). Phonology meets ideology: The meaning of orthographic practices in British Creole. Language Problems and Language Planning 22(1):1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinatora, Francesco L. (2019). Chronotopes, entextualization and Syrian political activism on Facebook. Multilingua 38(4):427–58.Google Scholar
Spooner, Brian (1994). Are we teaching Persian? or Farsi? or Dari? or Tojiki? In Marashi, Mehdi (ed.), Persian studies in America, 175–90. Bethesda, MD: Iranbooks (IBEX).Google Scholar
Szabla, Malgorzata, & Blommaert, Jan (2018). Does context really collapse in social media interaction? Applied Linguistics Review. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0119.Google Scholar
Tabatabaei, Seyed Amin, & Asadpour, Masoud (2014). Study of influential trends, communities, and websites on the post-election events of Iranian presidential election in Twitter. In Missaoui, Rokia & Sarr, Idrissa (eds.), Social network analysis: Community detection and evolution, 7187. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Wojcieszak, Magdalena, & Smith, Briar (2014). Will politics be tweeted? New media use by Iranian youth in 2011. New Media & Society 16(1):91109.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. (2013). Is the personal political? Chronotopes and changing stances toward Catalan language and identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 16(2):210–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(5):788806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Normativity, power, and agency: On the chronotopic organization of orthographic conventions on social media
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Normativity, power, and agency: On the chronotopic organization of orthographic conventions on social media
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Normativity, power, and agency: On the chronotopic organization of orthographic conventions on social media
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *