Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-w9nzq Total loading time: 0.229 Render date: 2021-07-30T15:17:13.764Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Ideologies of language and race in US media discourse about the Trayvon Martin shooting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Adam Hodges
Affiliation:
Carnegie Mellon University5032 Forbes Avenue SMC 1070, Pittsburgh, PA 15289-1070, USAadamhodges@cmu.edu
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

This article examines the discourse about race and racism that ensued in the US media after the shooting death of an African American youth, Trayvon Martin, by a neighborhood watch volunteer, George Zimmerman, in February 2012. The analysis examines news programs from the three major cable television channels in the United States: CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC. The theoretical framework builds upon Hill's (2008) discussion of the ‘folk theory of race and racism’ in contrast to critical race theory, and asks, to what extent does the mainstream media's discourse about race remain embedded in folk ideas and to what extent (if at all) does the conversation move beyond those ideas? The paper aims to unpack the ideologies of race and language that underpin talk about race and racism in an effort to expose the hidden assumptions in the discourse that hinder more productive dialogue on the topic. (Critical race theory, folk theory of race and racism, George Zimmerman, ideology, language ideology, media discourse, race, race talk, racism, slurs, Trayvon Martin)*

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alim, H. Samy, & Reyes, Angela (2011). Introduction: Complicating race. Discourse & Society 22(4):379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alim, H. Samy, & Reyes, Angela & Smitherman, Geneva (2012). Articulate while black. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Ed. by Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael, trans. by McGee, Vern W.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Baugh, John (2003). Linguistic profiling. In Makoni, Sinfree, Smitherman, Geneva, Ball, Arnetha, & Spears, Arthur (eds.), Black linguistics, 155–68. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, & Briggs, Charles (1990). Poetics and performances as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19(1):5988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo (2013). Racism without racists. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo, & Forman, T. A. (2000). ‘I am not a racist but…’: Mapping white college students’ racial ideology in the USA. Discourse & Society 11(1):5085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2008). Finding identity. Multilingua 27(1–2):151–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira & Trechter, Sara (2001). Introduction: White noise. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(1):321.Google Scholar
Childress, Sarah (2012). Is there racial bias in ‘stand your ground’ laws? PBS Frontline. Online: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/criminal-justice/is-there-racial-bias-in-stand-your-ground-laws/.Google Scholar
D'Andrade, Roy (1995). The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dick, Hilary Parsons, & Wirtz, Kristina (eds.) (2011). Racializing discourses. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21. Online: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.2011.21.issue-s1/issuetoc.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (1993). Truth and intentionality. Cultural Anthropology 8(2):214–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhardt, Jennifer; Goff, Phillip Atiba; Purdie, Valerie; & Davies, Paul (2004). Seeing black: Race, crime, and visual processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87(6):876–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Feagin, Joe (2006). Systemic racism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feagin, Joe (2010). Racist America. Thousand Oaks, CA: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan (2005). Language ideologies compared. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Jane (2000). Read my article: Ideological complexity and the over-determination of promising in American presidential politics. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of language, 259–92. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane (2008). The everyday language of white racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith, & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of language, 3583. Santa Fe, NM: SAR Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2008). Discourse analysis. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul (2004). Language ideologies. In Duranti, Alessandro (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology, 496517. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina (2011). English with an accent. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Oddo, John (2014). Intertextuality and the 24 hour news cycle. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Omi, Michael, & Winant, Howard (1994). Racial formation in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael (1979). The conduit metaphor. In Ortony, Andrew (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rickford, John Russell, & Rickford, Russell John (2000). Spoken soul. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle (1982). The things we do with words. Language in Society 11(2):203–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description. In Basso, Keith & Selby, Henry (eds.), Meaning in anthropology, 1155. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul, Hanks, William, & Hofbauer, Carol (eds.), The elements, 193247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun (1987). Communicating racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun (1998). Ideology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society 3(1):87118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wise, Tim (2009). Between Barack and a hard place. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Wise, Tim (2010). Colorblind. San Francisco, CA: City Lights Books.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn, & Schieffelin, Bambi (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23(1):5582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ideologies of language and race in US media discourse about the Trayvon Martin shooting
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Ideologies of language and race in US media discourse about the Trayvon Martin shooting
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Ideologies of language and race in US media discourse about the Trayvon Martin shooting
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *