Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-j7tnp Total loading time: 0.254 Render date: 2021-07-27T19:42:59.627Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Jennifer Sclafani
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Department of Linguistics 1421 37th Street NW, Washington DC 20057, USA Hellenic American University, Department of Applied Linguistics Massalias 22, Athens 10680, GreeceJennifer.Sclafani@georgetown.edu
Corresponding

Abstract

This study investigates the construction of political identity in the 2011–2012 US Republican presidential primary debates. Focusing on candidates’ self-introductions, I analyze how candidates use references to family members and roles to frame their political identities or ‘presidential selves’. Family references are shown to (i) frame candidates’ personal identities as family men/women; (ii) interweave the spheres of home and politics and consequently, their private and public selves; (iii) serve as a tool of discursive one-upmanship in self-introduction sequences; and (iv) demonstrate intimate familiarity and expertise on the topic of national security. This study extends research on family discourse and identity by examining the rhetorical function of mentioning family-related identities in explicitly persuasive public discourse, and contributes to sociolinguistic research on political discourse by examining how family identities serve as a resource for framing political identities. (Discourse analysis, framing, family, identity, political discourse, presidential debates, sequentiality)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ariel, Mira (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aylor, Brooks (1999). Source credibility and presidential candidates in 1996: The changing nature of character and empathy evaluations. Communication Research Reports 16:296304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays, trans. by McGee, Vern W., 60102. Austin: The University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Christina S. (1996). ‘I've got some points I'd like to make here’: The achievement of social face through turn management during the 1992 vice presidential debate. Political Communication 13:166–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, William L., & Wells, William T. (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, & Hall, Kira (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies 7:585614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. (2001). Answers and evasions. Language in Society 30:403–42.Google Scholar
Dailey, William O.; Hinck;, Edward A. & Hinck, Shelly S. (2008). Politeness in presidential debates: Shaping political face in campaign debates from 1960 to 2004. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro (2006). Narrating the political self in a campaign for US Congress. Language in Society 35:467–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1971). Relations in public: Microstudies of the public order. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2002). ‘I'm Mommy and you're Natalie’: Role-reversal and embedded frames in mother-child discourse. Language in Society 31:679720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia (2009). Making meanings, creating family: Intertextuality and framing in family interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Cynthia; Tannen, Deborah; & Sacknovitz, Aliza (2007). A working father: One man's talk about parenting at work. In Tannen, Deborah, Kendall, Shari, & Gordon, Cynthia (eds.), Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families, 195233. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1982). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Trans. by Burger, Thomas & Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, Kenneth L. (ed.) (2004). Presidential candidate images. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen H., & Waldman, Paul (2003). The press effect: Politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (1999). The linguistic individual: Self-expression in language and linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara (2009). Stance, style, and the linguistic individual. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives, 2952. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Shari (1999). The interpenetration of (gendered) spheres: An interactional sociolinguistic analysis of a mother at work and at home. Washington, DC: Georgetown University dissertation.Google Scholar
Kendall, Shari (2006). Positioning the female voice within work and family. In Baxter, Judith (ed.), Speaking out: The female voice in public contexts, 179–97. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (1967/1980). Word, dialogue and novel. In Kristeva, Julia, Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art, ed. by Roudiez, Leon S., trans. by Gora, Thomas & Jardine, Alice, 6491. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael (2009). On ‘flip-flopping’: Branded stance-taking in US electoral politics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13:223–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael (2011). Barack Obama, being sharp: Indexical order in the pragmatics of precision-grip gesture. Gesture 11:241–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lempert, Michael, & Silverstein, Michael (2012). Creatures of politics: Media, message and the American presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Louden, Allan, & McCauliff, Kristen (2004). The ‘authentic candidate’: Extending candidate image assessment. In Hacker, Kenneth L. (ed.), Presidential candidate images, 85102. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mayo, Edith P. (2000). Party politics: The political impact of the first ladies’ social role. The Social Science Journal 37:577–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Arthur H.; Wattenberg, Martin P.; & Malanchuk, Oksana (1986). Schematic assessments of presidential candidates. The American Political Science Review 80(2):521–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg (2006). ‘Where are you from?’: Identifying place. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10:320–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Ellen (1981). Towards a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, Peter (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 223–56. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Romm, Joseph J. (1993). Defining national security: The nonmilitary aspects. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1992). Lectures on conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Santorum, Rick (2006). It takes a family: Conservatism and the common good. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70:1075–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1977). Opening encounters. American Sociological Review 424:671–91.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1984). Jewish argument as sociability. Language in Society 13:311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1993). ‘Speaking for another’ in sociolinguistic interviews. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 231–59. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (1996). Narrative as self-portrait: The sociolinguistic construction of identity. Language in Society 25:167203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah (2002). Mother and friends in a Holocaust life story. Language in Society 31:309–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Patrick A. (2012). Debatable humor: Laughing matters on the 2008 presidential primary campaign. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1994). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. Gender and discourse, 1952. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah; Kendall, Shari; & Gordon, Cynthia (eds.) (2007). Family talk: Discourse and identity in four American families. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah, & Wallat, Cynthia (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination/interview. In Tannen, Deborah (ed.), Framing in discourse, 5776. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Teven, Jason J. (2008). An examination of perceived credibility of the 2008 presidential candidates: Relationships with believability, likeability, and deceptiveness. Human Communication 11:391408.Google Scholar
Watson, Robert P. (ed.) (2004). Life in the White House: A social history of the first family and the president's house. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
6
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Family as a framing resource for political identity construction: Introduction sequences in presidential primary debates
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *