Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-27T01:57:41.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of implemented ontologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Nicolaas J. I. Mars
Affiliation:
Knowledge-based Systems Group, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands

Extract

A number of groups developing knowledge-based systems have found (or at least posited) that the design and representation of a limitative set of concepts and relations, a so-called ontology, can contribute to sharing and reusing knowledge bases. However, very few descriptions of implemented ontologies have appeared in the literature. No comparison of competing proposals is available, let alone an empirical determination of the benefits of using an ontology. There is no accepted method for designing and building such ontologies, nor is it clear how ontologies can best be evaluated.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mars, NJI (Ed.), 1992. “Workshop knowledge sharing and resue: ways and means”. In: Workshop notes; 10th European Conference on Artifical Intelligence, 3–7 08, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Mars, NJI(Ed.), 1994. “Workshop comparison of implemented ontologies”. In: Workshop noted; 11th European Conference on Artifical Intelligence, 8–12 08, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar