Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:09:02.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ryan S. Kemp and Christopher Iacovetti, Reason and Conversion in Kierkegaard and the German Idealists New York: Routledge, 2020 Pp. xi + 181 ISBN 9780815396314 (hbk), £120.00

Review products

Ryan S. Kemp and Christopher Iacovetti, Reason and Conversion in Kierkegaard and the German Idealists New York: Routledge, 2020 Pp. xi + 181 ISBN 9780815396314 (hbk), £120.00

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2022

G. Anthony Bruno
G. Anthony Bruno*
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK
*
Email: g.anthony.bruno@rhul.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Kantian Review , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2022 , pp. 169 - 173
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bruno, G. Anthony (2014) ‘Freedom and Pluralism in Schelling’s Critique of Fichte’s Jena Wissenschaftslehre’. Idealistic Studies, 43(1/2), 71–86.10.5840/idstudies20145196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, G. Anthony (2016) ‘“As from a State of Death”: Schelling’s Idealism as Mortalism’. Comparative and Continental Philosophy, 8(3), 1–14.10.1080/17570638.2016.1231878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, G. Anthony (2020) ‘Schelling’s Philosophical Letters on Doctrinend Critique’. In Acosta, M. and McQuillan, C. J. (eds), Critique in German Philosophy: From Kant to Critical Theory (Albany, NY: SUNY Press), 133–54.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1962–2012). Gesamtausgabe der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften [GA]. Ed. Lauth, R., Jacobs, H. and Gliwitzky, H.. Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt: Frommann-holzboog.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1965) Sämmtliche Werke [SW]. Ed. Fichte, I. H.. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1982) Science of Knowledge. Trans. Heath, P. and Lachs, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1988) Early Philosophical Writings. Trans. Breazeale, D.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1994) Introductions to the Wissenschaftslehre and Other Writings. Trans. Breazeale, D.. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Fichte, J. G. (1998) Foundations of Transcendental Philosophy (Wissenschaftslehre) nova methodo. Trans. Breazeale, D.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.10.7591/9781501728983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieke, Wolfgang (1972) ‘Dogmatismus’. In Ritter, J., Gründer, K. and Gabriel, G. (eds), Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, vol. 2. Basel: Schwabe Verlag.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1856-61) Sämmtliche Werke [SSW]. Ed. Schelling, K. F. A.. Stuttgart: Cotta.Google Scholar
Schelling, F. W. J. (1980) The Unconditioned in Human Knowledge: Four Early Essays 1794–1796. Trans. Marti, F.. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.Google Scholar