We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Thomas C. Vinci, Space, Geometry, and Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the CategoriesOxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 Pp. xii + 251 ISBN 9780199381166 (hbk) $74.00
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
08 October 2015
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Allison, H. E. (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (1978) ‘Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument’. Kant-Studien, 69, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S. (1994) ‘The Transcendental Deduction and Skepticism’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32 (1), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, D. (1969) ‘The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction’. Review of Metaphysics, 22 (4), 640–659.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992) On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World [Inaugural Dissertation]. In D. Walford (trans. and ed.), Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–416.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1997) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Trans. G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (2004) Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Trans. M. Friedman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Trans. C. T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shaddock, J. (2014) ‘Kant and the Most Difficult Thing that Could Ever Be Undertaken on Behalf of Metaphysics’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31 (1), 41–58.Google Scholar