Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-kbvt8 Total loading time: 0.334 Render date: 2021-10-24T13:39:14.488Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Article contents

Semi-quantitative assessment of wing feather mite (Acarina) infestations on passerine birds from Portugal. Evaluation of the criteria for accurate quantification of mite burdens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1999

J. Behnke
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
P. McGregor
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K. Present address: Zoological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Tagensvej 16, DK-2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.
J. Cameron
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
I. Hartley
Affiliation:
Biological Sciences Division, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.
M. Shepherd
Affiliation:
Designated Areas and Site Branch, Research and Advisory Services Directorate, Scottish Natural Heritage, 2 Anderson Place, Edinburgh EH6 5NP, U.K.
F. Gilbert
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
C. Barnard
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
J. Hurst
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K. Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.
S. Gray
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K.
R. Wiles
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Buckingham, Buckingham MK18 1EG, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Wing feather mite burdens on seven species of passerine birds (Carduelis carduelis – goldfinch; C. chloris – greenfinch; Serinus serinus – serin; Sylvia atricapilla – blackcap; Sylvia melanocephala – Sardinian warbler; Turdus merula – blackbird; Passer domesticus – house sparrow) from Portugal were assessed by the subjective semi-quantitative scoring system of Behnke et al. (1995) in order to evaluate more fully the accuracy and reliability of the technique. Our analysis indicated that in all species, scores allocated to flight feathers showed a significant positive relationship with mite counts as assessed through microscopical examination of the same feathers. However, there were differences between species of birds. Of the species examined, goldfinches and greenfinches showed the weakest relationships between assigned mite scores and actual mite numbers indicating that the technique was less accurate when applied to these species compared with the remaining five. No evidence was found that anything more was to be gained from scoring both wings, rather than just one. Feather mites (Proctophyllodes spp., Trouessartia incisa) were also detected on tail feathers, but the assessment of these feathers presented additional problems and it was concluded that in the interests of minimizing handling time of birds, tail scores had little more to offer. We conclude that scoring all the flight feathers (including all primary, secondary, and tertiary feathers) on one entire wing, but alternating between left and right wings of birds within a species, represents an acceptable compromise between sufficiently detailed examination and minimization of bird handling time in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Semi-quantitative assessment of wing feather mite (Acarina) infestations on passerine birds from Portugal. Evaluation of the criteria for accurate quantification of mite burdens
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Semi-quantitative assessment of wing feather mite (Acarina) infestations on passerine birds from Portugal. Evaluation of the criteria for accurate quantification of mite burdens
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Semi-quantitative assessment of wing feather mite (Acarina) infestations on passerine birds from Portugal. Evaluation of the criteria for accurate quantification of mite burdens
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *