Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T12:19:37.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upside-down behaviour of certain ribbon worms (phylum Nemertea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2024

Hiroshi Kajihara*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Hokkaido, Japan
Audrey Falconer
Affiliation:
Sciences Department, Museums Victoria Research Institute, Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia Marine Research Group, The Field Naturalists Club of Victoria, 1 Gardenia Street, Blackburn, VIC 3130, Australia
Alexei Viktorovich Chernyshev
Affiliation:
A.V. Zhirmunsky National Scientific Centre of Marine Biology, Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Palchevskogo Street 17, Vladivostok, 690041, Russia
*
Corresponding author: Hiroshi Kajihara; Email: kajihara@eis.hokudai.ac.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ribbon worms in the genus Balionemertes from Vietnam, the Philippines, Australia, and Guam—as well as Cephalothrix suni from Vietnam—were examined. Our observations indicate that the worms crawl mostly with their ventral surface upwards (the ventral surface being where the mouth opens), a behaviour that has not been documented in previous literature. Like many other worm species with colour patterns, they have a darker-coloured and/or more intensely patterned behavioural dorsal surface (= anatomical ventral surface in Balionemertes and C. suni) than the other side. This type of behavioural dorsoventral body-axis inversion among vermiform benthos seems to be rare—not having hitherto been known at least in the phylum Nemertea—and may be related to their feeding strategy, which should be observed in future studies.

Type
Field Note
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

The ribbon worms depicted in Figure 1 are members of the palaeonemertean genus Balionemertes, which were collected and observed independently by us. These specimens are the basis of our previous publications regarding geographical occurrence (Baker et al. Reference Baker, Falconer, Kinasz, Futterer, Crawford, Puxley, Baker-Johnson, Ruxton, Newton, Hart, Moffat, Strous, Sutcliffe, Butvilla, Santiago, Baade and Aston2015, Chernyshev Reference Chernyshev, Adrianov and Lutaenko2016), molecular phylogeny (Kvist et al. Reference Kvist, Chernyshev and Giribet2015, Chernyshev and Polyakova Reference Chernyshev and Polyakova2021), and morphological investigations (Chernyshev Reference Chernyshev2015, Magarlamov et al. Reference Magarlamov, Chernyshev and Turbeville2018, Reference Magarlamov, Turbeville and Chernyshev2021, Chernyshev and Kajihara Reference Chernyshev and Kajihara2019, Kajihara Reference Kajihara2020).

Figure 1. Unidentified Balionemertes spp. A–C, among the seagrass Amphibolis antarctica collected at a depth of 2 m in Mozzie Flat, Yorke Peninsula, South Australia, 35.1130°S, 137.4970°E, 17 April 2014, by the South Australian Conservation Research Divers (see Baker et al. Reference Baker, Falconer, Kinasz, Futterer, Crawford, Puxley, Baker-Johnson, Ruxton, Newton, Hart, Moffat, Strous, Sutcliffe, Butvilla, Santiago, Baade and Aston2015) (photographs taken by Leon Altoff); anterior fragment, 55 mm in length. D, E, intertidal, among calcareous red algae, Van Phong Bay, Vietnam, 12.66°N, 109.33°E, 21 May 2010, by Alexei V. Chernyshev. F–H, among calcareous red algae at a depth of 1 m in Biti Bay, Guam, 6 May 2015, by Alexei V. Chernyshev. I, J, intertidal, under rock, Buente, Carmen, Cebu, Philippines, 10.6208°N, 124.0277°E, 22 September 2006, by Hiroshi Kajihara; anterior fragment, 3 cm in length. A, B, E, F, G, I, ventral view; C, E, H, I, dorsal view; A–F, I, J, living state; G, H, fixed state; arrowheads indicating the position of the mouth. Abbreviations: doc, dorsal ocellus; loc, lateral ocellus; voc, ventral ocellus.

Little is known about the biology of Balionemertes due to their rare occurrence. Two decades ago, the genus Balionemertes was established for the single species Balionemertes australiensis based on material from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia (Sundberg et al. Reference Sundberg, Gibson and Olsson2003) but since then only a handful of occurrences have been reported. In Australia, Balionemertes ribbon worms were subsequently found in Western Australia (Whisson Reference Whisson2023), South Australia (Baker et al. Reference Baker, Falconer, Kinasz, Futterer, Crawford, Puxley, Baker-Johnson, Ruxton, Newton, Hart, Moffat, Strous, Sutcliffe, Butvilla, Santiago, Baade and Aston2015) (Fig. 1a–c), and New South Wales (Riek Reference Riek2022). Apart from Australia, they have been reported from India (Shrinivaasu et al. Reference Shrinivaasu, Venkataraman, Venkatraman, Venkataraman, Raghunathan, Mondal and Raghuraman2015), Vietnam (Chernyshev Reference Chernyshev, Adrianov and Lutaenko2016) (Fig. 1d, e), the Philippines (Kajihara Reference Kajihara2020) (Fig. 1i, j), and Guam (Magarlamov et al. Reference Magarlamov, Chernyshev and Turbeville2018) (Fig. 1f–h); they are also distributed in the Nansei Islands of Japan (Kajihara pers. obs.). At least four different colour morphs are recognised, each probably representing a different species. However, because the colouration of the holotype is not precisely known, species-name allocation to some of these colour morphs is currently problematic, with B. australiensis being the sole valid species name in the genus.

One thing that has not been documented in the existing Balionemertes literature is that the worms crawl and swim upside down. When placed on a Petri dish in seawater, they move like a long, slender pipe fish or a robust horsehair worm, and can swim by wriggling fast from side to side upon stimulus. The mouth is usually tightly closed, thus can be inconspicuous (Fig. 1d), and almost unrecognisable in quick motion; however, it becomes obvious in a narcotised/fixed state due to muscular relaxation/contraction (Fig. 1g), eventually manifesting the worm’s ventral side (the mouth generally opens on the ventral side at a certain distance from the tip of the head in ribbon worms belonging to Palaeonemertea and Pilidiophora). In the living state, the worms often appear to lack a clear sense of up and down, lying on either dorsal or ventral surfaces. They have groups of eyespots on the dorsal, ventral, and lateral surfaces of the head (Fig. 1b, c, g, h), and this might indicate that they can live on both sides. Still, however, the side with the mouth mainly faces upward while the worm crawls. This behavioural dorsoventral inversion is consistent with the difference in the body colour shades. Like many other worm species with colour patterns, members of Balionemertes also have a darker-coloured and/or more intensely patterned behavioural dorsal surface than the other side (Fig. 1a–j). What is peculiar in Balionemertes is that the behavioural dorsal side is the anatomical ventral side.

Animals in a wide variety of taxa are known to live with their belly oriented upward, either continually or temporarily. Speaking of aquatic creatures alone, the list can include (not exhaustive): pelagic sea slugs in the genus Glaucus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Chiu, Chang and Lee2017); giant clams in the genus Tridacna (Mollusca: Bivalvia) (Yonge Reference Yonge1975); brine shrimp (Crustacea: Anostraca: Artemia) (Fryer Reference Fryer2006); barnacles (Crustacea: Cirripedia) (Essock-Burns et al. Reference Essock-Burns, Gohad, Orihuela, Mount, Spillmann, Wahl and Rittschof2017); marine-cave-dwelling remipedians (Crustacea: Remipedia) (Koenemann et al. Reference Koenemann, Schram, Iliffe, Hinderstein and Bloechl2007); the anchialine shrimp Procaris ascensionis (Crustacea: Decapoda) (Abele and Felgenhauer Reference Abele and Felgenhauer1985); backswimmers (Hemiptera: Notonectidae) (Gittelman Reference Gittelman1976); the upside-down catfish Synodontis (Actinopterygii: Mochokidae) (Blake and Chan Reference Blake and Chan2007); and the upside-down pipefish Heraldia nocturna (Actinopterygii: Syngnathidae) (Paxton Reference Paxton1975). The upside-down jellyfish Cassiopeia are excluded since their body plan does not have a dorsoventral axis, as they are not bilaterally symmetrical. All these animals in the list are either neustons, nektons, or sessile organisms. So far as we know, there are no benthic, non-sessile animals that can be included in the list other than Balionemertes and another species of ribbon worm, Cephalothrix suni (Chernyshev pers. obs.). In the latter species, only the behavioural dorsal side (= anatomical ventral side) is pigmented (Chernyshev and Polyakova Reference Chernyshev and Polyakova2021). We suppose another congener, Cephalothrix queenslandica, may also crawl with its ventral side up; the dorsoventral orientation was likely misidentified in the original description of the species (Sundberg et al. Reference Sundberg, Gibson and Olsson2003).

Dorsoventral body-axis inversion is believed to have happened in ancestral chordates, which were likely free-living (non-sessile) and worm-like (e.g., Satoh et al. Reference Satoh, Rokhsar and Nishikawa2014). To what extent the inversion is comparable between the ancestral chordates and the present Balionemertes is unknown, but it is obviously an interesting example of parallel evolution. The open question is why Balionemertes and C. suni (and possibly C. queenslandica as well) move the way they do. We also have no idea why their geographic distribution is limited to the tropical and subtropical Indo-West Pacific. At the moment we can only speculate that their behaviour may be related to the way they hunt their prey, which should be observed in future studies.

Acknowledgements

We thank Leon Altoff for providing digital images of Balionemertes.

Financial support

This study was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research grants (No. 14-04-01067) for AVC and by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Core University Program ‘Studies on development and utilisation of fisheries resources in the coastal waters in the Philippines’) for HK.

Competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Abele, LG and Felgenhauer, BE (1985) Observations on the ecology and feeding behavior of the anchialine shrimp Procaris ascensionis . Journal of Crustacean Biology 5, 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J, Falconer, A, Kinasz, D, Futterer, A, Crawford, H, Puxley, K, Baker-Johnson, J, Ruxton, S, Newton, A, Hart, K, Moffat, B, Strous, A, Sutcliffe, M, Butvilla, W, Santiago, J and Baade, L and Aston, D (2015) Marine Invertebrates of the Northern and Yorke NRM Region: Results of 2013–2014 Field Work, Including Records of New Species. NRM Community Grant Report for Northern and Yorke NRM Board, and S.A. Department for Environment, Water & Natural Resources, 59 pp. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10957.61926 (accessed 25 September 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, RW and Chan, KH (2007) Swimming in the upside down catfish Synodontis nigriventris: it matters which way is up. Journal of Experimental Biology 210, 29792989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernyshev, AV (2015) CLSM analysis of the phalloidin-stained muscle system of the nemertean proboscis and rhynchocoel. Zoological Science 32, 547560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernyshev, AV (2016) Nemerteans of the coastal waters of Vietnam. In Adrianov, AV and Lutaenko, KA (eds), Biodiversity of the Western Part of the South China Sea. Vladivostok: Dalnauka, 279314.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, AV and Kajihara, H (2019) Comparative muscular morphology in Archinemertea (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea). Zoomorphology 138, 193207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernyshev, AV and Polyakova, NE (2021) An integrative description of a new Cephalothrix species (Nemertea: Palaeonemertea) from the South China Sea. Zootaxa 4908, 584594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Essock-Burns, T, Gohad, NV, Orihuela, B, Mount, AS, Spillmann, CM, Wahl, KJ and Rittschof, D (2017) Barnacle biology before, during and after settlement and metamorphosis: a study of the interface. Journal of Experimental Biology 220, 194207.Google ScholarPubMed
Fryer, G (2006) The brine shrimp’s tale: a topsy turvy evolutionary fable. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 88, 377382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gittelman, SH (1976) Swimming ability of Notonectidae (Hemiptera). Psyche: A Journal of Entomology 83, 319323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, HD, Chiu, WC, Chang, M and Lee, KS (2017) First record of a rare aggregation of the neustonic nudibranch Glaucus marginatus (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Glaucidae) from Kenting National Park, Southern Taiwan. Collection and Research 30, 1721.Google Scholar
Kajihara, H (2020) Three species of ribbon worms (Nemertea) from Cebu, the Philippines. Species Diversity 25, 251273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenemann, S, Schram, FR, Iliffe, TM, Hinderstein, LM and Bloechl, A (2007) Behavior of Remipedia in the laboratory, with supporting field observations. Journal of Crustacean Biology 27, 534542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kvist, S, Chernyshev, AV and Giribet, G (2015) Phylogeny of Nemertea with special interest in the placement of diversity from Far East Russia and northeast Asia. Hydrobiologia 760, 105119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magarlamov, TY, Chernyshev, AV and Turbeville, JM (2018) Pseudocnidae of archinemerteans (Nemertea, Palaeonemertea) and their implications for nemertean systematics. Journal of Morphology 279, 14441454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magarlamov, TY, Turbeville, JM and Chernyshev, AV (2021) Pseudocnidae of ribbon worms (Nemertea): ultrastructure, maturation, and functional morphology. PeerJ 9, e10912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paxton, JR (1975) Heraldia nocturna, a new genus and species of pipefish (family Syngnathidae) from eastern Australia, with comments on Maroubra perserrata. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, 4th Series vol. 40. San Francisco: California Academy of Science, 429447.Google Scholar
Riek, D (2022) Family: Cephalotrichellidae; Balionemertes sp? http://www.roboastra.com/Worms/brwo27.html (accessed 1 October 2023).Google Scholar
Satoh, N, Rokhsar, D and Nishikawa, T (2014) Chordate evolution and the three-phylum system. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, 20141729. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrinivaasu, S, Venkataraman, K and Venkatraman, C (2015) Checklist of nemerteans with a new record in Indian coastal waters. In Venkataraman, K, Raghunathan, C, Mondal, T and Raghuraman, R (eds), Lesser Known Marine Animals of India. Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India, 173175.Google Scholar
Sundberg, P, Gibson, R and Olsson, U (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of a group of palaeonemerteans (Nemertea) including two new species from Queensland and the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Zoologica Scripta 32, 279296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whisson, G (2023) iNaturalist observation. https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/160057855 (accessed 1 October 2023).Google Scholar
Yonge, CM (1975) Giant clams. Scientific American 232, 96105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Unidentified Balionemertes spp. A–C, among the seagrass Amphibolis antarctica collected at a depth of 2 m in Mozzie Flat, Yorke Peninsula, South Australia, 35.1130°S, 137.4970°E, 17 April 2014, by the South Australian Conservation Research Divers (see Baker et al. 2015) (photographs taken by Leon Altoff); anterior fragment, 55 mm in length. D, E, intertidal, among calcareous red algae, Van Phong Bay, Vietnam, 12.66°N, 109.33°E, 21 May 2010, by Alexei V. Chernyshev. F–H, among calcareous red algae at a depth of 1 m in Biti Bay, Guam, 6 May 2015, by Alexei V. Chernyshev. I, J, intertidal, under rock, Buente, Carmen, Cebu, Philippines, 10.6208°N, 124.0277°E, 22 September 2006, by Hiroshi Kajihara; anterior fragment, 3 cm in length. A, B, E, F, G, I, ventral view; C, E, H, I, dorsal view; A–F, I, J, living state; G, H, fixed state; arrowheads indicating the position of the mouth. Abbreviations: doc, dorsal ocellus; loc, lateral ocellus; voc, ventral ocellus.