Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-s4m2s Total loading time: 0.268 Render date: 2021-10-18T05:10:43.878Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2015

Graden Z.L. Froese*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Adrienne L. Contasti
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Abdul Haris Mustari
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, Department of Conservation of Forest Resources and Ecotourism, Kampus Fahutan, IPB Darmaga, Kotak Pos 168, Bogor 16001, Indonesia
Jedediah F. Brodie
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
*
1 Corresponding author. Email: gradenfroese@outlook.com

Abstract:

Anthropogenic edge effects, whereby disturbance strength increases in proximity to ecotone boundaries, are known to strongly affect individual species but we lack a general understanding of how they vary by species, disturbance type and regional context. We deployed 46 camera-trap stations for a total of 3545 trap-days at two sites in Sulawesi, Indonesia, obtaining 937 detections of five vertebrate species. Anoa (Bubalus spp.) were more abundant near edges, booted macaque (Macaca ochreata) and red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus) were less abundant near edges, and edges did not impact Sulawesi warty pig (Sus celebensis) or Malay civet (Viverra tangalunga). But the relative importance of habitat disturbance from agriculture, roads and villages differed for each species, and edge-induced disturbances varied not only in magnitude but also in direction between the study areas. In the strongest instance, macaque local abundance was 3.5 times higher near villages than it was 3 km into the forest in one reserve, but 2.8 times higher 3 km into the forest than near villages in the other reserve. Our results suggest that responses to habitat edges among species and edge types are idiosyncratic, and that landscape-level context can strongly alter the influence of local disturbance on biodiversity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AMICI, V., ROCCHINI, D., FILIBECK, G., BACARO, G., SANTI, E., GERI, F., LANDI, S., SCOPPOLA, A. & CHIARUCCI, A. 2015. Landscape structure effects on forest plan diversity at local scale: exploring the role of spatial extent. Ecological Complexity 21:4452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRODIE, J. & GIORDANO, A. 2013. Lack of trophic release with large mammal predators and prey in Borneo. Biological Conservation 163:5867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRODIE, J., GIORDANO, A. & AMBU, L. 2014. Differential responses of large mammals to logging and edge effects. Mammalian Biology 80:713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURTON, J., HEDGES, S. & MUSTARI, H. 2005. The taxonomic status, distribution and conservation of the lowland anoa Bubalus depressicornis and mountain anoa Bubalus quarlesi . Mammal Review 35:2550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURTON, A., SAM, M., BALANGTAA, C. & BRASHARES, J. 2012. Hierarchical multi-species modeling of carnivore responses to hunting, habitat and prey in a West African protected area. PLoS ONE 7: e38007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CANNON, C., SUMMERS, M., HARTING, J. & KESSLER, P. 2007. Developing conservation priorities based on forest type, condition, and threats in a poorly known ecoregion: Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biotropica 39:747759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CLOUGH, Y., PUTRA, D., PITOPANG, R. & TSCHARNTKE, T. 2009. Local and landscape factors determine functional bird diversity in Indonesian cacao agroforestry. Biological Conservation 142:10321041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DUMBRELL, A., CLARK, E., FROST, G., RANDELL, T., PITCHFORD, J. & HILL, J. 2008. Changes in species diversity following habitat disturbance are dependent on spatial scale: theoretical and empirical evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology 45:15311539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FISKE, I. & CHANDLER, R. 2011. Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. Journal of Statistical Software 43:123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FOX, J. 2013. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis should be abandoned. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28:8692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GARDNER, T., BARLOW, J., CHAZDON, R., EWERS, R., HARVEY, C., PERES, C. & SODHI, N. 2009. Prospects for tropical forest biodiversity in a human-modified world. Ecology Letters 12:561582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUSTON, M. 2014. Disturbance, productivity, and species diversity: empiricism vs. logic in ecological theory. Ecology 95:23822396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOSEPH, L., ELKIN, C., MARTIN, T. & POSSINGHAM, H. 2009. Modeling abundance using N-mixture models: the importance of considering ecological mechanisms. Ecological Applications 19:631642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KINNAIRD, M., SANDERSON, E., O’BRIEN, T., WIBISONO, H. & WOOLMER, G. 2003. Deforestation trends in a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals. Conservation Biology 17:245257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAURANCE, W., CROES, B., TCHIGNOUMBA, L., LAHM, S., ALONSO, A., LEE, M., CAMPBELL, P. & ONDZEANO, C. 2006. Impacts of roads and hunting on Central African rainforest mammals. Conservation Biology 20:12511261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LINKIE, M., DINATA, Y., NUGROHO, A. & HAIDIR, I. 2007. Estimating occupancy of a data deficient mammalian species living in tropical rainforests: sun bears in the Kerinci Seblat region, Sumatra. Biological Conservation 137:2027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LINKIE, M., GUILLERA-ARROITA, G., SMITH, J., ARIO, A., BERTAGNOLIO, G., CHEONG, F., CLEMENTS, G., DINATA, Y., DUANGCHANTRASIRI, S., FREDRIKSSON, G., GUMAL, M., HORNG, L., KAWANISHI, K., KHAKIM, F., KINNAIRD, M., KISWAYADI, D., LUBIS, A., LYNAM, A., MARYATI, MAUNG, M., NGOPRASERT, D., NOVARINO, W., O’BRIEN, T., PARAKKASI, K., PETERS, H., PRIATNA, D., RAYAN, D., SEUATURIEN, N., SHWE, N., STEINMETZ, R., SUGESTI, A., SUNARTO, SUNQUIST, UMPONJAN, M., WIBISONO, H., WONG, C. & ZULFAHMI, . 2013. Cryptic mammals caught on camera: assessing the utility of range wide camera trap data for conserving the endangered Asian tapir. Biological Conservation 162:107115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LYNAM, A., TANTIPISANUH, N., CHUTIPONG, W., NGOPRASERT, D., BAKER, M., CUTTER, P., GALE, G., KITAMURA, S., STEINMETZ, R., SUKMASUANG, R. & THUNHIKORN, S. 2012. Comparative sensitivity to environmental variation and human disturbance of Asian tapirs (Tapirus indicus) and other wild ungulates in Thailand. Integrative Zoology 7:389399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MOUILLOT, D., GRAHAM, N., VILLÉGER, S., MASON, N. & BELLWOOD, D. 2013. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 28:167177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PERES, C. 2000. Effects of subsistence hunting on vertebrate community structure in Amazonian forests. Conservation Biology 14:240253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRISTON, N., WYPER, R. & LEE, P. 2012. Buton macaques (Macaca ochreata brunnescens): crops, conflict, and behavior on farms. American Journal of Primatology 74:2936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RICKART, E., BALETE, D., ROWE, R. & HEANEY, L. 2011. Mammals of the northern Philippines: tolerance for habitat disturbance and resistance to invasive species in an endemic insular fauna. Diversity and Distributions 17:530541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROVERO, F., COLLETT, L., RICCI, S., MARTIN, E. & SPITALE, D. 2013. Distribution, occupancy, and habitat associations of the gray-faced sengi (Rhynchocyon udzungwensis) as revealed by camera traps. Journal of Mammalogy 94:792800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROVERO, F., MARTIN, E., ROSA, M., AHUMADA, J. & SPITALE, D. 2014. Estimating species richness and modelling habitat preferences of tropical forest mammals from camera trap data. PLoS ONE 9: e103300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ROYLE, J. 2004. N-mixture models for estimating population size from spatially replicated counts. Biometrics 60:108115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
STELBRINK, B., ALBRECHT, C., HALL, R. & VON RINTELEN, T. 2012. The biogeography of Sulawesi revisited: is there evidence for a vicariant origin of taxa on Wallace's “anomalous island”? Evolution 66:22522271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
VANTHOMME, H., KOLOWSKI, J., KORTE, L. & ALONSO, A. 2013. Distribution of a community of mammals in relation to roads and other human disturbances in Gabon, Central Africa. Conservation Biology 27:281291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Disturbance impacts on large rain-forest vertebrates differ with edge type and regional context in Sulawesi, Indonesia
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *