Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:57:01.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of Macroalgal Carbohydrates By The Marine Amoeba Trichosphaerium Sieboldi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Andrew Rogerson ,
Alan G. Williams  and
Peter C. Wilson
Andrew Rogerson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, USA.
Alan G. Williams
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, Scotland, KA6 5HL.
Peter C. Wilson
Affiliation:
University Marine Biological Station Millport, Isle of Cumbrae, Scotland, KA28 OEG
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Trichosphaerium sieboldi is a marine amoeba with a cosmopolitan distribution. The ability of three strains, from different geographical regions, to digest a range of macroalgae was investigated. Prior to these experiments, methods were developed for the axenic cultivation of T. sieboldi. Algae included Fucus vesiculosus, F. spiralis, Laminaria digitata, L. saccharina, Mastocarpus stellatus, Palmaria palmata, Porhyra sp., and Ulva sp. All were degraded with equivalent ease; typically 50% of the tissue biomass was removed within seven days. The wall of this amoeba was studied to obtain clues on how a protist could be digesting macroalgal tissue. The fibrous nature of the outer cell wall presumably allows the wall to part and remesh during consumption of large particles. It is suggested that during digestion of macroalgae, the wall is parted to enable digestive enzymes to be localized along the surface of the seaweed wall, effectively forming an ‘enzyme pocket’. Trichosphaerium has both polysaccharidases and glycosidases, notably glucosidase, cellobiosidase, mannosidase and fucosidase. These enzymes work in concert to facilitate the breakdown of the complex polysaccharides found across the range of seaweeds used. These studies suggest that T. sieboldi could be a primary invader of seaweeds in the field. They also suggest that some protistan groups may be important in the degradation and recycling of algal material in coastal waters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 78 , Issue 3 , August 1998 , pp. 733 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angell, R.W., 1975. Structure of Trichosphaerium micrum sp. n. Journal of Protozoology, 22, 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angell, R.W., 1976. Observations on Trichospaerium platyxyrum sp. n. Journal of Protozoology, 23, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beguin, P., 1983. Detection of cellulase activity in polyacrylamide gels using Congo red-stained agar replicas. Analytical Biochemistry, 131, 333–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correa, J.A. & Flores, V., 1995. Whitening, thallus decay and fragmentation in Gracilaria chilensis associate with an endophytic amoeba. Journal of Applied Phycology, 7, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, D.W., Rogerson, A. & Laybourn-Parry, J., 1994. Respiration of the marine amoeba Trichosphaerium sieboldi by 14C and Cartesian diver methods. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 112, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, A., 1993. Present and future needs for algae and algal products. Hydrobiologia, 260/261, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaska, D.D., Yokota, T., Webb, H.M., Gibor, A., Polne-Fuller, M. & Kaska, W.C., 1991. Long-chain chloroalkane utilization by a marine protozoan. Journal of General Microbiology, 137, 2669–2672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloareg, B. & Quatrano, R.S., 1988. Structure of the cell walls of marine algae and ecophysiological functions of the matrix polysaccharides. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review, 26, 259–315.Google Scholar
Laemmli, U.K., 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, London, 227, 680–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lever, M., 1977. Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH): effect of bismuth on the reaction. Analytical Biochemistry, 81, 21–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mann, K.H., 1973. Seaweeds: their productivity and strategy for growth. Science, New York, 182, 975–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Michel, C. & Macfarlane, G.T., 1996. Digestive fates of soluble polysaccharides from marine macroalgae: involvement of the colonic microflora and physiological consequences for the host. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 80, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, I.G., 1985. Protozoa as sources of commercially produced enzymes - a review. Process Biochemistry, October 1985, 139–144.Google Scholar
Page, F.C., 1983. Marine Gymnamoebae. Cambridge: Institute of Ecology.Google Scholar
Page, F.C., 1988. A new key to freshwater and soil Gymnamoebae. Cambridge: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Polne-Fuller, M., 1987. A multinucleated marine amoeba which digests seaweeds. Journal of Protozoology, 34, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polne-Fuller, M., Rogerson, A., Amano, H. & Gibor, A., 1990. Digestion of seaweeds by the marine amoeba Trichosphaerium. Hydrobiologia 204/205, 409–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A., 1991. On the abundance of marine naked amoebae on the surfaces of five species of macroalgae. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 85, 301–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A., Hannah, F. & Gothe, G., 1996, The grazing potential of some unusual marine benthic amoebae feeding on bacteria. European Journal of Protistology, 34, 271–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogerson, A., Hannah, F.J. & Wilson, P.C., 1993. Nitzschia albicosalis: an apochloritic diatom worthy of ecological consideration. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 34, 513–522.Google Scholar
Schaudinn, F., 1911. Untersuchungen uber den generations-weschel von Trichosphaerium sieboldi Schn. In Herausgegeben mit unterstutzung der Hamburgischen Wissenschaftlichen Stiftung (ed. F., Schaudinn), pp. 150–207. Hamburg: Leopold Voss.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, A., 1878. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Protozoen. Zeitshcrift fuer Wissenschaftliche Zoologie, 30, 446–456.Google Scholar
Schuster, F.L., 1976. Fine structure of the schizont stage of the testate marine amoeba, Trichospaerium sp. Journal of Protozoology, 23, 86–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheegan, R. & Banner, F.T., 1973. Trichosphaerium - an extraordinary testate rhizipod from coastal waters. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 1, 245–260.Google Scholar
Sieburth, J.M., 1969. Studies on algal substances in the sea. III. The production of extracellular organic matter by littoral marine algae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 3, 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tracey, M.V., 1955. Cellulase and chitinase in soil amoebae. Nature, London, 181, 815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar