Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-30T16:25:47.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leg disposition in the brachyuran megalopa when swimming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. Atkins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Many brachyuran megalopae swim with the legs disposed in a curious manner. The chelipeds and first two pairs of walking legs are folded tightly beneath the body, while the two posterior pairs are wrapped over the dorsum, the third pair being stretched out anteriorly, the dactylus, according to its length, touching or being looped round the eye-stalk. It is suggested that this posture gives stream-lining to the megalopa and improves its swimming. The described arrangement has been observed in all but three of some twenty-five species occurring at Plymouth.

In the three exceptions, Corystes cassivelaunus, Thia polita and Pinnotheres pinnotheres (= veterum), all legs are carried folded beneath the body.

Reference is made to previous descriptions of the folding of the legs in the brachyuran megalopa.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , October 1954 , pp. 627 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boone, L., 1927. The littoral crustacean fauna of the Galapagos Islands. Part 1 Brachyura. Zoologica, N. Y., Vol. 8, pp. 127–288.Google Scholar
Connolly, C. J., 1923. The larval stages and megalops of Cancer amoenus (Herbst.). Contr. Canad. Biol., N.S., Vol. 1, pp. 337–52.Google Scholar
Connolly, C. J., 1925. The larval stages and megalops of Rhithropanopeus harrisi (Gould). Contr. Canad. Biol., Vol. 2, pp. 327–34.Google Scholar
Crane, J., 1940. On the post-embryonic development of brachyuran crabs of the Genus Ocypode. Zoologica, N.Y., Vol. 25, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D., 1852a. Conspectus of the Crustacea of the exploring expedition under Capt. Wilkesj U.S.N. Paguridea, continued, and subtribe Megalopidea. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Vol. 6, pp. 6–10.Google Scholar
Dana, J. D., 1852b. Crustacea. U.S. Exploring Expedition during the years 1838–42 under the Command of C. Wilkes, U.S.N., Vol. 13, pt. 1.Google Scholar
Edmonson, C. H., 1949. Some brachyuran megalopa. Occ. Pap. Bishop Mus., Vol. 19, pp. 233–46.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1903. The metamorphosis of Corystes cassivelaunus (Pennant). Quart. J. micr. Sci., Vol. 46, pp. 461–78.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1939. Bibliography of the larvae of decapod Crustacea. Ray Soc. Publ., Vol. 125.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1942. Larvae of decapod Crustacea. Ray Soc. Publ., Vol. 129.Google Scholar
Hart, J. F. L., 1935. The larval development of British Columbia Brachyura—I, Xanthidae, Pinnotheridae (in part) and Grapsidae. Canad. J. Res., Vol. 12, pp. 411–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornell, J., 1922. Some commensals of Indian alcyonarians and crabs. J. Bombay nat. Hist. Soc, Vol. 28, pp. 926–36.Google Scholar
Hyman, O. W., 1920. The development of Gelassimus after hatching. J. Morph., Vol. 33 (2), pp. 485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, O. W., 1922. Adventures in the life of a fiddler crab. Rep. Smithson. Instn, 1920 (1922), pp. 443–60.Google Scholar
Kemp, S., 1915. Fauna of the Chilka Lake: Crustacea Decapoda. Mem. Ind. Mus., Vol. 5, pp. 199–325Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1927. Studies of the Plymouth Brachyura. I. J. Mar. biol. Ass., U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 795–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1928. The larval stages of the Plymouth Brachyura. Proc. zool Soc. Lond., 1928, pp. 473–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1944. The larval stages of Portumnus (Crustacea Brachyura) with notes on some other genera. J. Mar. biol. Ass., U.K., Vol. 26, pp. 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menon, M. K., 1937. Decapod larvae from the Madras plankton. Bull. Madras Govt Mus., (nat. hist.) N.S., Vol. 3, No. 5.Google Scholar
Miyake, S., 1939. Notes on Crustacea Brachyura collected by Professor Teiso Esaki's Micronesia Expeditions 1937–1938. Rec. oceanogr. Wks Jap., Vol. 10, pp. 168–247.Google Scholar
Rathbun, M. J., 1918. The grapsoid crabs of America. Bull. U.S. nat. Mus., No. 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathbun, M. J., 1924. Brachyuran crabs collected by the Williams Galapagos expedition, 1923. Zoologica, N.Y., Vol. 5, pp. 153–9.Google Scholar
Russell, F. S., 1927. The vertical distribution of marine macroplankton. V. The distribution of animals caught in the ring-trawl in the daytime in the Plymouth area. J. Mar. biol. Ass., U.K., Vol. 14, pp. 557–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Say, T., 1817. An account of the Crustacea of the United States. J. Acad. nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Vol. 1, pp. 155–69.Google Scholar
Smith, S. I., 1873. The megalops stage of Ocypoda. Amer. J. Sci., Vol. 6 (3), no. 1.Google Scholar
Smith, S. I., 1880. Occasional occurrence of tropical and sub-tropical species of decapod Crustacea on the coast of New England. Trans. Conn. Acad. Arts Sci., Vol. 4, pp. 254–67.Google Scholar
Wells, W. W., 1940. Ecological studies on the pinnotherid crabs of Puget Sound. Univ. Wash. Publ. Oceanogr., Vol. 2, pp. 19–50.Google Scholar
Williamson, H. C., 1903. On the larval and early young stages, and rate of growth of the shore-crab (Carcinus maenas Leach.). Rep. Fish. Bd Scot., Ann. 21 (1902), pp. 136–79.Google Scholar