Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T23:04:32.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Irregular recruitment of the echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus and its implications for biological traits analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2020

Richard M. Warwick Open the ORCID record for Richard M. Warwick [Opens in a new window]  and
Bryony Pearce
Richard M. Warwick*
Affiliation:
Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, West Hoe, PlymouthPL1 3DH, UK Centre for Sustainable Aquatic Ecosystems, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, 90 South St, Murdoch, Western Australia6150, Australia
Bryony Pearce
Affiliation:
Pelagica Limited, 2 School House Cottage, Market Street, Hoylake, WirralCH47 3EP, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Richard M. Warwick, E-mail: rmw@pml.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Size-frequency analysis of the echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus from six offshore areas in the southern North Sea and eastern English Channel reveal five distinct cohorts, suggesting a lifespan of five years. In all six individual areas one or more year-groups are absent, due to the unsuccessful recruitment of planktonic larvae to the seabed in some years, giving a false impression of a shorter lifespan. A relatively long lifespan and planktotrophic larval development are remarkable for such a small species, which reaches a maximum test length of 7.3 mm in the area, such traits being more typical of large-sized macrobenthic species. The feeding mode is akin to that of many meiobenthic taxa. The architecture of the test confers exceptional strength and resilience to mechanical perturbation.

Keywords

Echinocyamus pusillusEnglish ChannelfeedinglongevityNorth Searecruitmentreproductionresiliencesize-frequency
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 7 , November 2020 , pp. 1123 - 1127
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Borja, Á, Franco, J and Perez, V (2000) A marine Biotic Index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 1100–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J, Frid, CLJ and Rogers, SI (2003 a) Assessing marine ecosystem health: the long-term effects of fishing on functional diversity in North Sea benthos. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 6, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremner, J, Rogers, SI and Frid, CLJ (2003 b) Assessing functional diversity in marine benthic ecosystems: a comparison of approaches. Marine Ecology Progress Series 254, 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, JB (1967) Dispersion and demography of some infaunal echinoderm populations. Symposia of the Zoological Society of London 20, 1–11.Google Scholar
Buchanan, JB and Warwick, RM (1974) An estimate of benthic macrofauna production in the offshore mud of the Northumberland coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 54, 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, DA, Kapasakali, D-A, Vincx, M and Vanaverbeke, J (2016) Short-term effects of fishery exclusion in offshore wind farms on macrofaunal communities in the Belgian Part of the North Sea. Fisheries Research 179, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, DJ (1984) Energy flow measurements. In Holme, AD and McIntyre, AD (eds), Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 284‒372.Google Scholar
Degen, R, Aune, M, Bluhm, B, Cassidy, C, Kedra, M, Kraan, C, Vandepitte, L, Wlodarska-Kowalczuk, M, Zhulay, I, Albano, PG, Bremner, J, Grebmeier, JM, Link, H, Morata, N, Nordström, MC, Shojaei, MG, Sutton, L and Zuschin, M (2018) Trait-based approaches in rapidly changing ecosystems: a roadmap to the future polar oceans. Ecological Indicators 91, 722–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degraer, S, Wittoeck, J, Appeltans, W, Cooreman, K, Deprez, T, Hillewaert, H, Hostens, K, Mees, J, Vanden Berghe, E and Vincx, M (2006) The macrobenthos atlas of the Belgian part of the North Sea. Belgian Science Policy. D/2005/1191/3. ISBN 90-810081-6-1, 164 pp.Google Scholar
de Ridder, C, Lawrence, JM (1982) Food and feeding mechanisms: Echinoidea. In Jangoux, M and Lawrence, JM (eds), Echinoderm Nutrition. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema, pp. 57‒115.Google Scholar
Duineveld, GCA and Jenness, MI (1984) Differences in growth rates of the sea urchin Echinocardium cordatum as estimated by the parameter ω of the von Bertalanffy equation applied to skeletal rings. Marine Ecology Progress Series 19, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eleftheriou, A and Basford, DJ (1989) The macrobenthic infauna of the offshore northern North Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 69, 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foden, J, Rogers, SI and Jones, AP (2010) Recovery of UK seabed habitats from benthic fishing and aggregate extraction – towards a cumulative impact assessment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folk, RL (1954) The distinction between grain size and mineral compositions in sedimentary rock nomenclature. Journal of Geology 62, 344–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, CL and Warwick, RM (1985) Annual macrofauna production in a hard-bottom reef community. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 65, 713–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grun, TB and Nebelsick, JH (2018) Structural design of the minute clypeasteroid echinoid Echinocyamus pusillus. Royal Society Open Science 5, 171323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayward, PJ and Ryland, JS (eds) (1990) The Marine Fauna of the British Isles and North-West Europe: II. Molluscs to Chordates. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, MJ, Clarke, KR, Hinz, H, Austen, MCV, Somerfield, PJ and Karakassis, I (2006) Global analysis of response and recovery of benthic biota to fishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcott, BM (1977) An introduction to the architecture and kinematics of harpacticoid (Copepoda) feeding: Tisbe furcata (Baird, 1837). Mikrofauna des Meeresbodens 61, 183–196.Google Scholar
Marine Ecological Surveys Ltd (2007) Predictive framework for assessment of recoverability of marine benthic communities following cessation of aggregate dredging. Technical Report to the Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (CEFAS) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). Project No MEPF 04/02. 115 pp + electronic appendices 466 pp. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323855148_Predictive_Framework_for_Assessment_of_Recoverability_of_Marine_Benthic_Communities_Following_Cessation_of_Aggregate_Extraction.Google Scholar
Mortensen, TH (1927) Handbook of the Echinoderms of the British Isles. London: Humphrey Milford Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muxika, I, Borja, Á and Bonne, W (2005) The suitability of the marine biotic index (AMBI) to new impact sources along European coasts. Ecological Indicators 5, 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picton, BE and Morrow, CC (2016) Echinocyamus pusillus (O F Müller, 1776). In Encyclopedia of Marine Life of Britain and Ireland. http://www.habitas.org.uk/marinelife/species.asp?item=ZB3880 (Accessed 2 September 2020).Google Scholar
Price, R and Warwick, RM (1980) Temporal variations in annual production and biomass in estuarine populations of two polychaetes, Nephtys hombergi and Ampharete acutifrons. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 60, 481–487.Google Scholar
Schückel, S, Ehrich, S, Kröncke, I and Reiss, H (2010) Linking prey composition of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus to benthic availability in three different areas of the northern North Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 77, 98–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Southward, EC and Campbell, AC (2006) Echinoderms: keys and notes for the identification of British species. Synopses of the British Fauna (new series) 56. Shrewsbury: Field Studies Council.Google Scholar
Strathmann, RR and Strathmann, MF (1982) The relationship between adult size and brooding in marine invertebrates. American Naturalist 119, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telford, M, Harold, AS and Mooi, R (1983) Feeding structures, behavior, and microhabitat of Echinocyamus pusillus (Echinoidea, Clypeastroida). Biological Bulletin 165, 745–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, EHM, Somerfield, PJ, Vanden Berghe, E, Bremner, J, Jackson, E, Langmead, O, Palomares, MLD and Webb, TJ (2012) Extensive gaps and biases in our knowledge of a well-known fauna: implications for integrating biological traits into macroecology. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21, 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, J, Brey, T, Heip, CH, Herman, PJM, Moens, T and van Oevelen, D (2013) Measuring the flow of energy and matter in marine benthic animal populations. In Eleftheriou, E (ed.), Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos, 4th edn. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 349‒425.Google Scholar
Warwick, RM and George, CL (1980) Annual macrofauna production in an Abra community. In Collins, MB, Banner, FT, Tyler, PA, Wakefield, SJ and James, AE (eds), Industrial Embayments and their Environmental Problems: A Case Study of Swansea Bay. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 517‒538.Google Scholar
Warwick, RM and Price, R (1975) Macrofauna production in an estuarine mud-flat. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 55, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, RM, George, CL and Davies, JR (1978) Annual macrofauna production in a Venus community. Estuarine, Coastal and Marine Science 7, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieser, W (1953) Die Beziehung zwischen Mundhöhlengestalt, Ernährungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen Nematoden. Arkiv för Zoologi 4, 439–484.Google Scholar
WoRMS Editorial Board. World Register of Marine Species. http://www.marinespecies.org (Accessed 6 November 2019).Google Scholar