Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:48:49.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intertidal zonation of live benthic foraminiferal assemblages from mangrove environments around south-west Penang Island, Peninsular Malaysia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2023

Muhamad Naim Abd Malek
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, USM, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Khairun Yahya
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, USM, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Anita Talib
Affiliation:
School of Distance Education, USM, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
Su Yean Teh
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, USM, 11800, Penang, Malaysia
Latiffah Zakaria*
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, USM, 11800 Penang, Malaysia
*
Author for correspondence: Latiffah Zakaria, E-mail: Lfah@usm.my

Abstract

Studies on benthic foraminifera were conducted in the mangrove forests of Teluk Tempoyak, Pulau Betong and Kuala Sungai Pinang, Penang Island, Peninsular Malaysia to examine species composition and distribution patterns in different intertidal zones. Twenty-eight live benthic foraminiferal species were successfully identified at the study locations, predominantly species with agglutinated tests. Assemblages in Pulau Betong and Teluk Tempoyak were dominated by similar species such as Ammonia aoteana, Elphidium hispidulum, Elphidium neosimplex and Trochammina inflata, while Kuala Sungai Pinang comprises a high number of Trochammina inflata and Arenoparrella mexicana. Three species, Aubignyna perlucida, Elphidium neosimplex and Elphidium sandiegoense, were recorded for the first time in Malaysian mangrove forests. Principal component analysis showed that sediment type and organic matter content were the dominant parameters that explained the variation of environmental gradient. Canonical correspondence analysis of these parameters with benthic foraminiferal species indicated that sand particles influenced distribution of the hyaline tests. Species with agglutinated tests were abundant in sediment with rich organic matter in combination with high silt and clay content. Species with hyaline tests dominated lower intertidal zones, while those with agglutinated tests inhabited the area from the middle to upper intertidal zones. This distribution pattern of benthic foraminiferal species mirrored patterns found at other local and global mangrove locations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abd Malek, MN, Frontalini, F, Yahya, K, Talib, A and Zakaria, L (2021) Taxonomical diversity of benthic foraminifera in mangrove sediments: initial insight into total diversity from Malaysia to worldwide mangrove forests records. Biodiversity and Conservation 30, 20332056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alve, E (2003) A common opportunistic foraminiferal species as an indicator of rapidly changing conditions in a range of environments. Estuary and Coastal Shelf Science 57, 501514.Google Scholar
Alve, E, Hess, S, Bouchet, VMP, Dolven, JK and Rygg, B (2019) Intercalibration of benthic foraminiferal and macrofaunal biotic indices: an example from the Norwegian Skagerrak coast (NE North Sea). Ecological Indicators 96, 107115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alve, E, Korsun, S, Schönfeld, J, Dijkstra, N, Golikova, E, Hess, S, Husum, K and Panieri, G (2016) Foram-AMBI: a sensitivity index based on benthic foraminiferal faunas from North-East Atlantic and Arctic fjords, continental shelves and slopes. Marine Micropaleontology 122, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, HA and Brasier, MD (2005) Microfossils. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barbosa, CF and Suguio, K (1999) Biosedimentary facies of a subtropical microtidal estuary – an example from Southern Brazil. Journal of Sedimentary Research 69, 576587.Google Scholar
Barnett, RL, Garneau, M and Bernatchez, P (2016) Salt-marsh sea-level indicators and transfer function development for the Magdalen Islands in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. Marine Micropaleontology 122, 1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barras, C, Jorissen, FJ, Labrune, C, Andrald, B and Boissery, P (2014) Live benthic foraminiferal faunas from the French Mediterranean coast: towards a new biotic index of environmental quality. Ecological Indicators 36, 719743.Google Scholar
Berkeley, A, Perry, CT and Smithers, SG (2009 a) Taphonomic signatures and patterns of test degradation on tropical, intertidal benthic foraminifera. Marine Micropaleontology 73, 148163.Google Scholar
Berkeley, A, Perry, CT, Smithers, SG, Horton, BP and Cundy, AB (2009 b) Foraminiferal biofacies across mangrove-mudflat environments at Cocoa Creek, north Queensland, Australia. Marine Geology 263, 6486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkeley, A, Perry, CT, Smithers, SG, Horton, BP and Taylor, KG (2007) A review of the ecological and taphonomic controls on foraminiferal assemblage development in intertidal environments. Earth-Science Reviews 83, 205230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouchet, VMP, Alve, E, Rygg, B and Telford and, RJ (2012) Benthic foraminifera provide a promising tool for ecological quality assessment of marine waters. Ecological Indicators 57, 501514.Google Scholar
Bunt, JS and Bunt, ED (1999) Complexity and variety of zonal pattern in the mangroves of the Hinchinbrook area, Northeastern Australia. Mangroves Salt Marshes 3, 165176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzas-Stephens, P, Buzas, MA, Price, JD and Courtney, CH (2018) Benthic superheroes: living foraminifera from three bays in the Mission-Aransas national estuarine research reserve, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 41, 23682377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzas, MA, Hayek, LAC, Jett, JA and Reed, SA (2015) Pulsating Patches History and Analyses of Spatial, Seasonal, and Yearly Distribution of Living Benthic Foraminifera. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buzas, MA and Severin, KP (1993) Foraminiferal densities and pore water chemistry in the Indian river, Florida. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences 36, 138.Google Scholar
Callard, SL, Gehrels, WR, Morrison, BV and Grenfell, HR (2011) Suitability of salt-marsh foraminifera as proxy indicators of sea level in Tasmania. Marine Micropaleontology 79, 121131.Google Scholar
Camacho, SG, Maria, D, Moura, DJ, Connor, S, Scott, DB and Boski, T (2015) Taxonomy, ecology and biogeographical trends of dominant benthic foraminifera species from an Atlantic-Mediterranean estuary (the Guadiana, southeast Portugal). Palaeontologia Electronica 18.1, 137.Google Scholar
Carugati, L, Gatto, B, Rastelli, E, Lo Martire, M, Coral, C, Greco, S and Danovaro, R (2018) Impact of mangrove forests degradation on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Scientific Reports 8, 13298.Google ScholarPubMed
Cesbron, F, Geslin, E, Jorissen, FJ, Delgard, ML, Charrieau, L, Deflandre, B, Jézéquel, D, Anschutz, P and Metzger, E (2016) Vertical distribution and respiration rates of benthic foraminifera: contribution to aerobic remineralization in intertidal mudflats covered by Zostera noltei meadows. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 179, 2338.Google Scholar
Chee, SY, Othman, AG, Sim, YK, Mat Adam, AN and Firth, LB (2017) Land reclamation and artificial islands: walking the tightrope between development and conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation 12, 8095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee, SY, Yee, JC, Carey, D, Yusup, Y and Gallagher, JB (2015) Anthropogenic marine debris accumulation in mangroves on Penang Island, Malaysia. Journal of Sustainability Science and Management 15, 3660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, KR, Gorley, RN, Somerfield, PK and Warwick, RM (2014) Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analyses and Interpretation, 3rd edition. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Contreras-Rosales, LA, Koho, KA, Duijnstee, IAP, de Stigter, HC, García, R, Koning, E and Epping, E (2012) Living deep-sea benthic foraminifera from the Cap de Creus Canyon (western Mediterranean): faunal–geochemical interactions. Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 64, 2242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culver, SJ and Horton, BP (2005) Infaunal marsh foraminifera from the outer North Carolina, USA. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 35, 148170.Google Scholar
Culver, SJ, Leorri, E, Corbett, DR, Mallinson, DJ, Shazili, NAM, Mohammad, MN, Parham, PR and Yaacob, R (2013) Infaunal mangrove swamp foraminifera in the Setiu Wetland, Terengganu Malaysia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 43, 262279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culver, SJ, Leorri, E, Mallinson, DJ, Corbett, DR and Shazili, NAM (2015) Recent coastal evolution and sea-level rise, Setiu Wetland, Peninsular Malaysia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 417, 406421.Google Scholar
Culver, SJ, Mallinson, DJ, Corbett, DR, Leorri, E, Rouf, AA, Shazili, NAM, Yaacob, R, Whittaker, JE, Buzas, MA and Parham, PR (2012) Distribution of foraminifera in the Setiu estuary and lagoon, Terengganu, Malaysia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 42, 109133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, WE (1974) Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Research 44, 242248.Google Scholar
Debenay, JP (2012) A Guide to 1000 Foraminifera from South Western Pacific: New Caledonia, IRD Éditions. Publications scientifiques du Muséum, Paris: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle.Google Scholar
Debenay, JP and Guillou, JJ (2002) Ecological transitions indicated by foraminiferal assemblages in paralic environments. Estuaries 25, 11071120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debenay, JP, Guiral, D and Parra, M (2002) Ecological factors acting on the microfauna in mangrove swamps: the case of foraminiferal assemblages in French Guiana. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 55, 509533.Google Scholar
Debenay, JP and Luan, BT (2006) Foraminiferal assemblages and the confinement index as tools for assessment of saline intrusion and human impact in the Mekong Delta and neighbouring areas (Vietnam). Revue de Micropaléontologie 49, 7485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debenay, JP, Marchand, C, Molnar, N, Aschenbroich, A and Meziane, T (2015) Foraminiferal assemblages as bioindicators to assess potential pollution in mangroves used as a natural biofilter for shrimp farm effluents (New Caledonia). Marine Pollution Bulletin 93, 103120.Google ScholarPubMed
Debenay, JP and Parra, DGM (2004) Behaviour and taphonomic loss in foraminiferal assemblages of mangrove swamps of French Guiana. Marine Geology 208, 295314.Google Scholar
Deldicq, N, Langlet, D, Delaeter, C, Beaugrand, G, Seuront, L and Bouchet, VMP (2021) Effects of temperature on the behaviour and metabolism of an intertidal foraminifera and consequences for benthic ecosystem functioning. Scientific Reports 11, 4013.Google ScholarPubMed
Duffield, CJ, Hess, S, Norling, K and Alve, E (2015) The response of Nonionella iridea and other benthic foraminifera to “fresh” organic matter enrichment and physical disturbance. Marine Micropaleontology 120, 2030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, RJ and Horton, BP (2006) Developing detailed records of relative sea-level change using a foraminiferal transfer function: an example from North Norfolk, UK. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society 364, 973991.Google ScholarPubMed
Edwards, RJ, Wright, AJ and Van De Plassche, O (2004) Surface distributions of salt-marsh foraminifera from Connecticut, USA: modern analogues for high-resolution sea level studies. Marine Micropaleontology 51, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichler, PPB (2019) Foraminiferal zonation from a subtropical mangrove in Bertioga Channel (São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Regional Studies in Marine Science 25, 100460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskian, MG and Lipps, JH (1977) Distribution of foraminifera in the Russian River estuary, northern California. Micropaleontology 23, 453469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frontalini, F, Buosi, C, Da Pelo, S, Coccioni, R, Cherchi, A and Bucci, C (2009) Benthic foraminifera as bio-indicators of trace element pollution in the heavily contaminated Santa Gilla lagoon (Cagliari, Italy). Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 858877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frontalini, F and Coccioni, R (2011) Benthic foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution: a review of Italian research over the last three decades. Revue de Micropaléontologie 54, 115127.Google Scholar
Gao, G, San, LH and Zhu, Y (2021) Flood inundation analysis in Penang Island (Malaysia) based on InSAR maps of land subsidence and local sea level scenarios. Water 13, 1518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, ST and Watkins, GT (1999) Taphonomy of salt marsh foraminifera: an example from coastal Georgia. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149, 103111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, E and Bernal, G (2013) Influence of the environmental characteristics of mangrove forests on recent benthic foraminifera in the Gulf of Urabá, Colombian Caribbean. Ciencias Marinas 39, 6982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gooday, AJ (2003) Benthic foraminifera (Protista) as tools in deep-water palaeoceanography: environmental influences on faunal characteristics. In Southward, AJ (ed), Advances in Marine Biology. New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 190.Google Scholar
Gross, O (2000) Influence of temperature, oxygen and food availability on the migrational activity of bathyal benthic foraminifera: evidence by microcosm experiments. Hydrobiologia 426, 123137.Google Scholar
Hadiyanto, H, Widyastuti, E, Arbi, UY, Vimono, IB, Ulumuddin, YI, Dharmawan, WE and Prayudha, B (2018) Mangrove vegetation and sediment type influences on macrobenthic infauna in overwashed mangrove ecosystems: a case study from Pari Islands, Jakarta, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Conservation Biology 7, 92100.Google Scholar
Hallock, P, Lidz, BH, Cockey-Burkhard, EM and Donnelly, KB (2003) Foraminifera as bioindicators in coral reef assessment and monitoring: the Foram Index. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 81, 221238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammer, Ø, Harper, DAT and Ryan, PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 1, 19.Google Scholar
Haynert, K, Schönfeld, J, Schiebel, R, Wilson, B and Thomsen, J (2013) Response of benthic foraminifera to ocean acidification in their natural sediment environment: a long-term culturing experiment. Biogeosciences Discussions 10, 95239572.Google Scholar
Hayward, BW, Grenfell, HR, Sabaa, AT, Kay, J and Clark, K (2011) Ecological distribution of the foraminifera in a tidal lagoon-brackish lake, New Zealand, and its holocene origins. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 41, 124137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, BW, Scott, GH, Grenfell, HR, Carter, R and Lipps, JH (2004) Techniques for estimation of tidal elevation and confinement (~salinity) histories of sheltered harbours and estuaries using benthic foraminifera: examples from New Zealand. The Holocene 4, 218232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiri, O, Lotter, AAF and Lemcke, G (2001) Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility and comparability of results. Journal of Paleolimnology 25, 101110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogarth, PJ (2015) The Biology of Mangroves and Seagrasses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, BP and Culver, SJ (2008) Modern intertidal foraminifera of the Outer Banks, North Carolina, U.S.A., and their applicability for sea-level studies. Journal of Coastal Research 24, 11101125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, BP, Larcombe, P, Woodroffe, SA, Whittaker, JE, Wright, MR and Wynn, C (2003) Contemporary foraminiferal distributions of a mangrove environment, Great Barrier Reef coastline, Australia: implications for sea-level reconstructions. Marine Geology 198, 225243.Google Scholar
Horton, BP and Murray, JW (2007) The roles of elevation and salinity as primary controls on living foraminiferal distributions: Cowpen Marsh, Tees Estuary, UK. Marine Micropaleontology 63, 169186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, BP, Vann, DR, Engelhart, SE, Grand Pre, CA, Vane, CH, Nikitina, D and Anisfeld, SC (2012) Quantitative vertical zonation of salt-marsh foraminifera for reconstructing former sea level; an example from New Jersey, USA. Quaternary Science Reviews 54, 2639.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H (1933) Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. Journal of Educational Psychology 24, 417441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jauffrais, T, Jesus, B, Metzger, E, Mouget, JL, Jorissen, F and Geslin, E (2016) Effect of light on photosynthetic efficiency of sequestered chloroplasts in intertidal benthic foraminifera (Haynesina germanica and Ammonia tepida). Biogeosciences (Online) 13, 27152726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesus, B, Jauffrais, T, Trampe, ECL, Goessling, JW, Lekieffre, C, Meibom, A, Kühl, M and Geslin, E (2022) Kleptoplast distribution, photosynthetic efficiency and sequestration mechanisms in intertidal benthic foraminifera. The ISME Journal 16, 822832.Google ScholarPubMed
Kawahata, HK, Iguchi, A, Inoue, M, Iwasaki, S, Kuroyanagi, A and Suzuki, A (2019) Perspective on the response of marine calcifiers to global warming and ocean acidification-behaviour of corals and foraminifera in a high CO2 world “hot house”. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 6, 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, AC, Buzas, MA, Horton, BP and Culver, SJ (2011) Influence of patchiness on modern salt-marsh foraminifera used in sea-level studies (North Carolina, USA). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 41, 114123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, AC, Telford, RJ, Horton, BP, Anisfeld, SC and Sommerfield, CK (2013) Reconstructing Holocene sea level using salt-marsh foraminifera and transfer functions: lessons from New Jersey, USA. Journal of Quaternary Science 28, 617629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khodadad, S and Dong-Ho, J (2015) Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Penang Island, Malaysia. Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association 22, 109122.Google Scholar
Krumbein, WC and Pettijohn, FL (1938) Manual of Sedimentary Petrography. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Langer, MR, Olugbenga, FT and Mannl, S (2016) Assemblages of recent intertidal mangrove foraminifera from the Akanda National Park, Gabon: sea level proxies preserved in faunal assemblages. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie – Abhandlungen 281, 327338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Cadre, V, Debenay, JP and Lesourd, M (2003) Low pH effects on ammonia beccarii test deformation: implications for using test deformations as a pollution indicator. The Journal of Foraminiferal Research 33, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Cadre, V and Debenay, JP (2006) Morphological and cytological responses of ammonia (Foraminifera) to copper contamination: implication for the use of foraminifera as bioindicators of pollution. Environmental Pollution 143, 304317.Google ScholarPubMed
Lee, SS, Muhamad, A and Tong, J (2015) Mangrove Guidebook for Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Wetlands International.Google Scholar
Legendre, P and Birks, HJB (2012) From classical to canonical ordination. In Birks, HJB, Lotter, AF, Juggins, S and Smol, JP (eds), Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments: Data Handling and Numerical Techniques. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 201248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M, Lei, Y, Li, T and Jian, Z (2019) Impact of temperature on intertidal foraminifera: results from laboratory culture experiment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 520, 151224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lintner, M, Biedrawa, B, Wukovits, J, Wanek, W and Heinz, P (2020) Salinity depending algae uptake and subsequent carbon and nitrogen metabolisms of two intertidal foraminifera (Ammonia tepida and Haynesina germanica). Biogeosciences (Online) 17, 37233732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malaysian Meteorological Department (2017) Annual Report. Available at http://www.met.gov.my/content/pdf/penerbitan/laporantahunan/laporantahunan2017.pdf (accessed 26 June 2019).Google Scholar
Mendes, I, Gonzalez, R, Dias, JMA, Lobo, F and Martins, V (2004) Factors influencing recent benthic foraminifera distribution on the Guadiana shelf (Southwestern Iberia). Marine Micropaleontology 51, 171192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milker, Y and Schmiedl, G (2012) A taxonomic guide to modern benthic shelf foraminifera of the western Mediterranean Sea. Palaeontologia Electronica 15, 1134.Google Scholar
Minhat, FI, Ghandhi, SM, Ahzan, NSM, Haq, NA, Manaf, OARA, Sabohi, SM, Lee, LH, Akhir, MF and Abdullah, MM (2021) The occurrence and distribution of benthic foraminifera in tropical waters along the Strait of Malacca. Frontiers in Marine Science 8, 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minhat, FI, Yahya, K, Talib, A and Ahmad, O (2014) Benthic foraminiferal distributions as bioindicators in coastal waters of Penang National Park, Malaysia. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 44, 143150.Google Scholar
Mojtahid, M, Jorissen, F, Lansard, B and Fontanier, C (2010) Microhabitat selection of benthic foraminifera in sediments off the Rhone River mouth (NW Mediterranean). Journal of Foraminiferal Research 40, 231246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mojtahid, M, Zubkov, MV, Hartmann, M and Gooday, AJ (2011) Grazing of intertidal benthic foraminifera on bacteria: assessment using pulse-chase radiotracing. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 399, 2534.Google Scholar
Murray, JW (2006) Ecology and Applications of Benthic Foraminifera. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, JW and Alve, E (1999) Taphonomic experiments on marginal marine foraminiferal assemblages: how much ecological information is preserved? Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 149, 183197.Google Scholar
Murray, JW and Alve, E (2000) Major aspects of foraminiferal variability (standing crop and biomass) on a monthly scale in an intertidal zone. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 30, 177191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, JW, Whittaker, JE and Alve, E (2000) On the type species of Aubignyna and a description of A. hamblensis, a new microforaminifer from temperate shallow waters temperate shallow waters. Journal of Micropalaeontology 1, 6167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz, S, Alegret, L, Payros, A, Orue-Etxebarria, X, Apellaniz, E and Molina, E (2011) Distribution patterns of benthic foraminifera across the Ypresian-Lutetian Gorrondatxe section, Northern Spain: response to sedimentary disturbance. Marine Micropaleontology 78, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozarko, DL, Patterson, RT and Williams, HFL (1997) Marsh foraminifera from Nanaimo, British Columbia (Canada); implications of infaunal habitat and taphonomic biasing. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 27, 5168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paliy, O and Shankar, V (2016) Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Molecular Ecology 25, 10321057.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Papaspyrou, S, Diz, P, García-Robledo, E, Corzo, A and Jimenez-Arias, J-L (2013) Benthic foraminiferal community changes and their relationship to environmental dynamics in inter tidal muddy sediments (Bay of Cádiz, SW Spain). Marine Ecology Progress Series 490, 121135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, CT, Berkeley, A and Smithers, SG (2008) Microfacies characteristics of a tropical, mangrove-fringed shoreline, Cleveland Bay, Queensland, Australia: sedimentary and taphonomic controls on mangrove facies development. Journal of Sedimentary Research 78, 7797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phleger, FB and Bradshaw, JS (1966) Sedimentary environments in a marine marsh. Science (New York, N.Y.) 154, 15511553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillet, L, Voltski, I, Korsun, S and Pawlowski, J (2011) Molecular phylogeny of Elphidiidae (Foraminifera). Marine Micropaleontology 103, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raposo, D, Clemente, I, Figueiredo, M, Vilar, A, Lorini, ML, Frontalini, F, Martins, V, Belart, P, Fontana, L, Habib, R and Laut, L (2018) Benthic foraminiferal and organic matter compounds as proxies of environmental quality in a tropical coastal lagoon: the Itaipu Lagoon (Brazil). Marine Pollution Bulletin 129, 114125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawat, US and Agarwal, NK (2015) Biodiversity: concept, threats and conservation. Environment Conservation Journal 16, 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, W, Urish, D, Feller, I and Wright, R (2009) Relationships between frequency of ground exposure and forest cover in a mangrove island ecosystem. Atoll Research Bulletin 568, 17.Google Scholar
Saraswat, R, Kouthanker, M, Kurtarkar, S, Nigam, S and Linshy, VN (2011) Effect of salinity induced pH changes on benthic foraminifera: a laboratory culture experiment. Biogeosciences Discussions 8, 84238450.Google Scholar
Satyanarayana, B, Husain, ML, Ibrahim, R, Ibrahim, S and Dahdouh-Guebas, F (2014) Foraminiferal distribution and association patterns in the mangrove sediments of Kapar and Matang, West Peninsular Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Science and Managements 9, 3248.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C, Kucera, M and Uthicke, S (2014) Combined effects of warming and ocean acidification on coral reef foraminifera Marginopora vertebralis and Heterostegina depressa. Coral Reefs 33, 805818.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, J, Alve, E, Geslin, E, Jorissen, F, Korsun, S and Spezzaferri, S (2012) The FOBIMO (FOraminiferal BIo-MOnitoring) initiative – towards a standardised protocol for soft-bottom benthic foraminiferal monitoring studies. Marine Micropaleontology 94–95, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, DB, Medioli, FS and Schafer, CT (2004) Monitoring in Coastal Environments Using Foraminifera and Thecamoebian Indicators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, DB, Mudie, PJ and Bradshaw, JS (2011) Coastal evolution of southern California as interpreted from benthic foraminifera, ostracodes, and pollen. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 41, 285307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semensatto-Jr, DL, Funo, RHF, Dias-Brito, D and Coelho-Jr, C (2009) Foraminiferal ecological zonation along a Brazilian mangrove transect: diversity, morphotypes and the influence of subaerial exposure time. Revue de Micropaleontologie 52, 6774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A, Ghosh, M, Khanderao, P, Das, SK, Chowdhury, DR, Sarkar, PK, Saha, R and Bhadury, P (2015) Modern benthic foraminiferal assemblages from the world's largest deltaic mangrove ecosystem, the Sundarbans. Marine Biodiversity 46, 421431.Google Scholar
Sen Gupta, BK (2003) Modern Foraminifera. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, TA, Kirby, JR, Holgate, S, Tutman, P and Plater, AJ (2016) Contemporary salt-marsh foraminiferal distribution from the Adriatic coast of Croatia and its potential for sea-level studies. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 46, 314332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shennan, I, Long, AJ and Horton, BP (2015) Handbook of Sea Level Research. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strachan, KL, Finch, JM, Hill, TR and Barnett, RL (2015) Environmental controls on the distribution of salt-marsh foraminifera from the southern coastline of South Africa. Journal of Biogeography 43, 887898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugawara, D, Minoura, K, Nemoto, N, Tsukawaki, S, Goto, K and Imamura, F (2009) Foraminiferal evidence of submarine sediment transport and deposition by backwash during the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. Island Arc 18, 513525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukardjo, S (2006) Botanical exploration in small islands: 1. Floristic ecology and the vegetation types of Pari Island, West Java, Indonesia. South Pacific Studies 2, 7387.Google Scholar
Tuckwell, GW, Allen, K, Roberts, S and Murray, JW (1999) Simple models of agglutinated foraminifera test construction. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 46, 248253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, AE, Goldstein, ST, Triantaphyllou, MV and Langer, MR (2021) Community responses of intertidal foraminifera to pH variations: a culture experiment with propagules. Aquatic Ecology 55, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodroffe, SA, Horton, BP, Larcombe, P and Whittaker, JE (2005) Intertidal mangrove foraminifera from the central Great Barrier Reef shelf, Australia: implications for sea-level reconstruction. Journal of Foraminiferal Research 35, 259270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, AJ, Edwards, RJ and van de Plassche, O (2011) Reassessing transfer-function performance in sea-level reconstruction based on benthic salt-marsh foraminifera from the Atlantic coast of NE North America. Marine Micropaleontology 81, 4362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wukovits, J, Enge, AJ, Wanek, W, Watzka, M and Heinz, P (2017) Increased temperature causes different carbon and nitrogen processing patterns in two common intertidal foraminifera (Ammonia tepida and Haynesina germanica). Biogeosciences (Online) 14, 28152829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahya, K, Shuib, S, Minhat, FI, Ahmad, O and Talib, A (2014) The distribution of benthic foraminiferal assemblages in the north-west coastal region of Malacca Straits, Malaysia. Journal of Coastal Life Medicine 2, 784790.Google Scholar
Zolkhiflee, N, Yahya, K and Shuib, S (2021) Intertidal zone preferences of fiddler crabs in tropical mangroves reflect species specific selection across multiple spatial and temporal scales. Regional Studies in Marine Science 48, 101994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Abd Malek et al. supplementary material

Abd Malek et al. supplementary material

Download Abd Malek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 171.6 KB