Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T17:14:54.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The defensive adaptations of Lima hians (Mollusca, Bivalvia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

T. H. J. Gilmour
T. H. J. Gilmour
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The inability of Lima Mans Gmelin to enclose the soft tissues of the body within the shell is correlated with the development of other defensive adaptations.

L, Mans can automize entire pallial tentacles or parts of tentacles which subsequently secrete a viscous mucus distasteful to potential predators. Autotomy takes place at transverse septa along the length of the tentacles and mucus is secreted by epidermal gland cells.

The transverse septa of the tentacles also regulate the hydrostatic pressure of blood within the tentacles and permit the performance of complex locomotory movements. It is suggested that the septa were originally developed to serve this locomotory function and, secondarily, function as planes of weakness at which autotomy may take place.

L. Mans builds protective nests. The nests are constructed by burrowing into a gravel substratum and consolidating the walls of the burrow with byssal threads. When disturbed in the nest L. Mans performs locomotory movements which lead to enlargement of the nest. If the nest is broken the locomotory activities result in free swimming followed by attempts to burrow into the substratum to form a new nest. It is unlikely that L. Mans swims freely in nature except when displaced from the nest.

Introduction

Most bivalve molluscs react to unfavourable stimuli by retracting the soft parts of the body within the shell valves and contracting the adductor muscles to oppose the valve margins. In Lima hians Gmelin the mantle margin, even with its numerous long tentacles fully retracted, cannot be accommodated within the shell valves. In this paper the inability of L. hians to retract the soft parts within the valves is correlated with two types of defensive behaviour: (i) the secretion of mucus by the tentacles of the mantle margin and the autotomy of these tentacles, and (ii) the interrelated activities of swimming and nest-building.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 209 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boutan, L., 1917. Note sur le Papillon de mer (Lima hyans). P.-v. Soc. linn. Bordeaux., Vol. 70, pp. 70–2.Google Scholar
Buddenbrock, W. Von, 1911. Untersuchungen iiber die Schimmbewegung und die Statocysten der Gattung Pecten. Sber. heidelb. Akad. Wiss., Bd. 28.Google Scholar
Crozier, W. J., 1921. Notes on some problems of adaptation. 5. The phototropism of Lima. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 41, pp. 102–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1849. A History of British Mollusca, and Their Shells. Vol. 2. London: van Voorst.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, J. D. F., 1895. Lima Mans and its mode of life. Trans, nat. Hist. Soc. Glasg., Vol. 4, pp. 218–25.Google Scholar
Gilmour, T. H. J., 1963. A note on the tentacles of Lima Mans (Gmelin) (Bivalvia). Proc. malac. Soc. Lond., Vol. 35, pp. 81–5.Google Scholar
Jefferies, R. P. S., 1960. Photonegative young in the Triassic lamellibranch Lima lineata (Schlotheim). Palaeontology, Vol. 3, pp. 362–9.Google Scholar
Lacaze-Duthiers, H. DE, 1865. Description des gîtes des Limes. Annls Sci. nat., Ser. Zool., T. 4, pp. 347–52.Google Scholar
Nelson, T. C., 1938. The feeding mechanism of the oyster. I. On the pallium and branchial chambers of Ostrea virginica, O. edulis and O. angulata with comparisons of other members of the genus. J. Morph., Vol. 63, pp. 1–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawitz, B., 1887. Über den Mantelrand der Feilenmuschel. Anat. Anz., Bd. 2, pp. 398–9.Google Scholar
Rawitz, B., 1888. Der Mantelrand der Acephalen. E. Teil. Jena Z. Naturw., Bd. 23.Google Scholar
Robertson, D., 1896. On Lima Mans. Trans, nat. Hist. Soc. Glasg., Vol. 4, pp. 331–2.Google Scholar
Sommerville, A., 1896. Note on the molluscan genus Lima. Trans, nat. Hist. Soc. Glasg., Vol. 4, pp. 296–303.Google Scholar
Studnitz, G. Von, 1931. Die Morphologie und Anatomie von Lima inflata, der Feilenmuschel, nebst biologischen Untersuchungen an Lima Mans Gmel. Zool. Jb., Abt. Anat., Bd. 53, pp. 199–316.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E. 1960. Defensive acid secretion in marine gastropods. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 115–22.Google Scholar
Vlés, F., 1906. Théorie de la locomotion du Pecten. Mém. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 19, pp. 243–54.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. M., 1936. The evolution of the swimming habit in the Lamellibranchia. Mem. Mus. Hist. nat. Belg., T. 3, pp. 77–100.Google Scholar