Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:25:50.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTERTWINING MAPS FROM CERTAIN GROUP ALGEBRAS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1998

VOLKER RUNDE
Affiliation:
Fachbereich 9 Mathematik, Universität des Saarlandes, Postfach 151150, 66041 Saarbrücken, Germany. E-mail: runde@math.uni-sb.de
Get access

Abstract

In [17, 18, 19], we began to investigate the continuity properties of homomorphisms from (non-abelian) group algebras. Already in [19], we worked with general intertwining maps [3, 12]. These maps not only provide a unified approach to both homomorphisms and derivations, but also have some significance in their own right in connection with the cohomology comparison problem [4].

The present paper is a continuation of [17, 18, 19]; this time we focus on groups which are connected or factorizable in the sense of [26]. In [26], G. A. Willis showed that if G is a connected or factorizable, locally compact group, then every derivation from L1(G) into a Banach L1(G)-module is automatically continuous. For general intertwining maps from L1(G), this conclusion is false: if G is connected and, for some n∈ℕ, has an infinite number of inequivalent, n-dimensional, irreducible unitary representations, then there is a discontinuous homomorphism from L1(G into a Banach algebra by [18, Theorem 2.2] (provided that the continuum hypothesis is assumed). Hence, for an arbitrary intertwining map θ from L1(G), the best we can reasonably hope for is a result asserting the continuity of θ on a ‘large’, preferably dense subspace of L1(G). Even if the target space of θ is a Banach module (which implies that the continuity ideal [Iscr ](θ) of θ is closed), it is not a priori evident that θ is automatically continuous: the proofs of the automatic continuity theorems in [26] rely on the fact that we can always confine ourselves to restrictions to L1(G) of derivations from M(G) [25, Lemmas 3.1 and 3.4]. It is not clear if this strategy still works for an arbitrary intertwining map from L1(G) into a Banach LL1(G)-module.

Type
Notes and Papers
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)