Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:58:15.455Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The lexical item as a phonetic entity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

R. K. Sprigg
Affiliation:
(School of Oriental and African Studies)

Extract

‘“… there is more near-ambiguity in language than it is always convenient to admit”; and in studying stress and juncture it would be especially valuable, in order to avoid too great a reliance either on introspection or on artificially contrived confrontations, to make a collection of ambiguities in action in the form of fully-documented instances of uncertainty of interpretation or of actual misunderstanding‘ (Sharp, 1960: 112–13).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Firth, J. R. (1951). ‘Modes of Meaning’, Essays and Studies 1951 (The English Association), 118–49.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, D. (1917, 12th ed. 1963). An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1918, 9th ed. 1960). An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1931). ‘δə “ wə:d ” əz ɔ fonetik entiti’, Maître Phonétique, 36, 60–5.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1964). ‘Some allophones of /1/ in American English’, Acoustical Characteristics of selected English Consonants (Pt. 4 International Journal of American Linguistics, 30, 3, Jul., 1964), 1050. Bloomington: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1965). A Linguistic Study of the English Verb. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Sharp, A. E. (1960). ‘Stress and juncture in English’, Transactions of the Philological Society 1960, 104–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar