Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T13:45:30.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Laryngeal realism and the voicing contrast in Khuzestani Arabic stops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Nawal Bahrani
Affiliation:
Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Iran nawal.bahrani@yahoo.com
Vladimir Kulikov
Affiliation:
Department of English Literature and Linguistics, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar vkulikov@qu.edu.qa

Abstract

In laryngeal realism (LR), laryngeal specification of stops is explained by direct maps of cues (e.g. VOT) onto privative phonological laryngeal features [voice] or [spread glottis]. Phonetic realization of the segments and speakers’ ‘control’ (e.g. the degree of intervocalic voicing and speech rate manipulation effects on VOT duration) are used as diagnostics of phonological specification. Similar to some Arabic vernacular dialects (e.g. Qatari Arabic), Khuzestani Arabic in Iran presents a case where three voiced stops /b d ɡ/ are in contrast with voiceless stops /p t k/, but two voiceless guttural plosives /tˁ q/ have no voiced homorganic counterparts. In this paper we examine the phonetic realization of voicing in these stops at word-initial and intervocalic position, as well as the effects of speech rate manipulation on VOT and closure voicing. The data came from 12 native speakers recorded in Khorramshahr, Iran. Our findings suggest an over-specified voicing system in this Arabic variety. We found that voiced /b d ɡ/ were produced with voicing lead in initial position and complete closure voicing word medially, voiceless /p t k/ had long lag VOT, while guttural /tˁ q/ had short lag VOT. Speech rate manipulation revealed that only duration of (pre)voicing and duration of aspiration increased in slower speech. Also, f0, F1, and F2 were measured at vowel onset to evaluate the glottal state in production of stops. The results support the predictions of LR that voiced stops are specified by [voice], voiceless stops are [sg], while gutturals lack underlying specification for voice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbaasian, Fatemeh & Nourbakhsh, Mandana. 2015. Ilam Kurdish dialect type determined by measuring the VOT. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects 2(8), 7999.Google Scholar
Ahmed, Zhwan O. 2019. The application of English theories to Sorani phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Durham University.Google Scholar
Ahn, Suzy. 2018. The role of tongue position in laryngeal contrasts: An ultrasound study of English and Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics 71, 451467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Malwi, Ibrahim M. 2017. The effects of gender and age on voice onset time by Abha Arabic speakers. Master’s thesis, California State University, Long Beach.Google Scholar
AL-Gamdi, Nief, Al-Tamimi, Jalal & Khattab, Ghada. 2019. The acoustic properties of laryngeal contrast in Najdi Arabic initial stops. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIX), 2051–2055. Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar
Sean, Allen, J. & Miller, Joanne L.. 1999. Effects of syllable-initial voicing and speaking rate on the temporal characteristics of monosyllabic words. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 20312039.Google Scholar
Alzoubi, Abdulaziz. 2016. A sociophonetic study of the effect of gender on emphatic–plain contrast in Jordanian Arabic. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 140, 31133113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amirian, Beaina. 2017. Vizhegihā-ye sotshenakhti-ye hamkhānhā-ye ensedādi va ensāyeshi dar zabān-e Armani-ye Sharghi [A study of acoustic features of stops and affricates in Eastern Armenian]. Master’s thesis, Allameh Tabataba’i University.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Nawal. 2022. Word-initial voicing contrast in Khuzestani Arabic stops. Journal of Language Related Research 13, 477510.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Nawal & Modarresi Ghavami, Golnaz. 2021. Khuzestani Arabic. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 51, 299313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, Dale J., Levy, Roger, Scheepers, Christoph & Tily, Harry J.. 2013. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255278.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 . Journal of Statistical Software 67, 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Helgason, Pétur, McMurray, Bob & Ringen, Catherine. 2011. Rate effects on Swedish VOT: Evidence for phonological overspecification. Journal of Phonetics 39, 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Jessen, Michael & Ringen, Catherine. 2013. Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics 49, 259284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkí, José R. 2001. Place of articulation and first formant transition pattern both affect perception of voicing in English. Journal of Phonetics 29, 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bijankhan, Mahmood & Nourbakhsh, Mandana. 2009. Voice onset time in Persian initial and intervocalic stop production. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39, 335364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.1.50). https://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bolla, Kalman. 1981. A conspectus of Russian speech sounds. Cologne: Bölau.Google Scholar
Chen, Mathew. 1970. Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica 22, 129–159.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2016. Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 54, 3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Matthew J. 2010. Contrast coding in multiple regression analysis: Strengths, weaknesses, and utility of popular coding structures. Journal of Data Science 8, 6173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dmitrieva, Olga, Liano, Fermando, Shultz, Amanda A. & Francis, Alexander L.. 2015. Phonological status, not voice onset time, determines the acoustic realization of onset f0 as a secondary voicing cue in Spanish and English. Journal of Phonetics 49, 7795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. 1992. The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghazeli, Salem. 1977. Back consonants and backing coarticulation in Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Haggard, Mark, Ambler, Stephen & Callow, Mo. 1970. Pitch as a voicing cue. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 47(2), 613617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1971. A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly Progress Report, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT 101, 198211.Google Scholar
Helgason, Pétur & Ringen, Catherine. 2008. Voicing and aspiration in Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics 36, 607628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J. & Ewan, William G.. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55, 3758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2005. Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of obstruent laryngeal specifications. In van Oostendorp, Marc & van de Weijer, Jeroen (eds.), The internal organization of phonological segments, 319354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
House, Arthur S. & Fairbanks, Grant. 1953. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 105113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunnicutt, Leigh & Morris, Paul A.. 2016. Prevoicing and aspiration in Southern American English. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1), Article 24.Google Scholar
Hussain, Qandeel. 2018. A typological study of voice onset time (VOT) in Indo-Iranian languages. Journal of Phonetics 71, 284305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, Gregory K. & Salmons, Joseph C.. 1995. Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12, 369396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, Wouter. 2004. Laryngeal contrast and phonetic voicing: A laboratory phonology approach to English, Hungarian, and Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael & Ringen, Catherine. 2002. Laryngeal feature in German. Phonology 19, 189218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1984. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60, 286319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessinger Rachel, H. & Blumstein, Sheila E.. 1997. Effects of speaking rate on voice-onset time in Thai, French, and English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 143168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khattab, Ghada, Al-Tamimi, Feda & Heselwood, Barry. 2006. Acoustic and auditory differences in the /t/–/ṭ/ opposition in male and female speakers of Jordanian Arabic. In Boudelaa, Sami (ed.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XVI, 131160. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Diehl, Randy L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70, 419454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John, Macmillan, Neil A., Walsh Dickey, Laura, Thorburn, Rachel & Bartels, Christine. 1997. Integrality in the perception of tongue root position and voice quality in vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 16961709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirby, James. 2018. Onset pitch perturbations and the cross-linguistic implementation of voicing: Evidence from tonal and non-tonal languages. Journal of Phonetics 71, 326354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, James & Robert Ladd, D.. 2018. Effects of obstruent voicing on vowel f0: Implications for laryngeal realism. Yearbook of the Poznań Linguistic Meeting 4, 213235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir. 2020. Laryngeal contrast in Qatari Arabic: Effect of speaking rate on VOT. Phonetica 77, 163185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Vladimir. 2022. Voice and emphasis in Arabic coronal stops: Evidence for phonological compensation. Language and Speech 65(1), 73104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulikov, Vladimir, Mohsenzadeh, Fatemeh M. & Syam, Rawand M.. Effects of emphasis spread on VOT in coronal stops in Qatari Arabic. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, doi:10.1017/S0025100321000256. Published online by Cambridge University Press, 2 November 2021.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per B. & Christensen, Rune H. B.. 2017. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82, 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1973. Features of the larynx. Journal of Phonetics 1, 7383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Seung Suk & Harper Berkson, Kelly. Speech rate effects on VOT in a three-category language: Evidence from Hakha Chin. Indiana Working Papers in South Asian Languages and Cultures 1(1), doi:10.14434/iwpsalc2019.v1i1.27453. Published online by Indiana University, 13 July 2019.Google Scholar
Leitner, Bettina & Bahrani, Nawal. Forthcoming. Khuzestani Arabic. In Charles George Häberl (ed.), Language diversity in Iran: New texts and perspectives from non-Iranian languages (The Companion of Iranian Languages and Linguistics (CILL)).Google Scholar
Liberman, Alvin M., Delattre, Pierre C. & Cooper, Franklin S.. 1958. Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech 1, 153167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1986. “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 29, 311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20(3), 384422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfqvist, Andres, Baer, Thomas, McGarr, Nancy S. & Robin Seider Story. 1989. The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 13141321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magloire, Joël & Green, Kerry P.. 1999. A cross-language comparison of speaking rate effects on the production of voice onset time in English and Spanish. Phonetica 56 158185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matuschek, Hannes, Kliegl, Reinhold, Vasishth, Shravan, Baayen, Harald & Bates, Douglas. 2017. Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 94, 305315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1994. The phonetics and phonology of Semitic pharyngeal. In Keating, Patricia A. (ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in Laboratory Phonetics III, 191233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, Paul A. 2018. Rate effects on Southern American English VOT. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 3(60), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohde, Ralph N. 1984. Fundamental frequency as an acoustic correlate of stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 75(1), 224230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öğüt, Fatih, Akif Kiliç, Mehmet, Zeki Engin, Erkan & Midilli, Raşit. 2006. Voice onset time for Turkish stop consonants. Speech Communication 48(9), 10941099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eve, Olson, D. & Hayes-Harb, Rachel. 2019. Voice onset time in Arabic and English stop consonants. Al-’Arabiyya 52, 2948.Google Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse. 1962. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 693703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pind, Jörgen. 1995. Speaking rate, voice-onset time, and quality: The search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 57, 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Rahim, Abbas Jawdat & Rakan Kasim, Ziyad. 2009. A spectrographic study of voice onset time in Arabic. Journal of Education and Science 16, 2841.Google Scholar
Rifaat, Khaled. 2003. Voice onset time in Egyptian Arabic: A case where phonological categories dominate. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Science (ICPhS XV), 791–794.Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Kulikov, Vladimir. 2012. Voicing in Russian stops: Cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20(2), 269286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Suomi, Kari. 2012. The voicing contrast in Fenno-Swedish stops. Journal of Phonetics 40(3), 419429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, Martha, Sonderegger, Morgan & Goad, Healther. 2019. Realization and representation of Nepali laryngeal contrasts: Voiced aspirated and laryngeal realism. Journal of Phonetics 73, 113127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, Scott & Garellek, Marc. 2018. Plosive voicing acoustics and voice quality in Yerevan Armenian. Journal of Phonetics 71, 425450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slis, Iman H. 1986. Assimilation of voice in Dutch as a function of stress, word boundaries, and sex of speaker and listener. Journal of Phonetics 14, 311326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 1992. Phonetic and phonological processes: The case of nasalization. Language and Speech 35(1–2), 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth & Klatt, Dennis. 1974. Role of formant transitions in the voiced–voiceless distinction for stops. Journal of Acoustic Society of America 55, 653659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summerfield, Quentin & Haggard, Mark. 1977. On the dissociation of spectral and temporal cues to the voicing distinction in initial stop consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 62, 435448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamim, Nour. 2017. Voicing contrast of stops in the Palestinian Arabic dialect. Master’s thesis, University Van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard. 1998. The sounds of French: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Alphen, Petra & Smits, Roel. 2004. Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: The role of prevoicing. Journal of Phonetics 32, 455491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaux, Bert & Samuels, Bridget. 2005. Laryngeal markedness and aspiration. Phonology 22, 395436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Janet C. 2002. The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westbury, John R. 1983. Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73, 13221336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westbury, John R. & Keating, Patricia A.. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22, 145166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, Grace H., Caramazza, Alfonso & Preston, Malcolm S.. 1977. A study of voicing in Lebanese Arabic. Journal of Phonetics 5, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zirak, Mahjoob. 2014. A case study of the Khorasani variety of Kurmanji language. Ph.D. dissertation, Hiroshima University.Google Scholar