Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:37:28.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of the Disability Rating Scale recovery curve as a predictor of psychosocial outcome following closed-head injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2001

STEPHEN R. McCAULEY ,
H. JULIA HANNAY  and
PAUL R. SWANK
STEPHEN R. McCAULEY
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
H. JULIA HANNAY
Affiliation:
Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery University of Houston, Department of Psychology
PAUL R. SWANK
Affiliation:
University of Texas Health Science Center–Houston, Department of Nursing
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rapid rate of recovery has been associated with better outcome following closed-head injuries, but few studies have compellingly demonstrated this. This study used growth curve analyses of Disability Rating Scale (DRS) scores at acute hospitalization discharge, 1, 3, and 6 months post injury in a sample of 55 patients with a closed-head injury. Six month post-injury outcome measures were taken from significant other (SO) responses on the NYU Head Injury Family Interview (NYU-HIFI) including severity and burden ratings of affective/neurobehavioral disturbance, cognitive deficits, and physical/dependency status. Rate of recovery (linear and curvilinear recovery curve components) was significantly related to the level of affective/neurobehavioral severity, and the severity and burden of SO-perceived cognitive deficits. Only the intercept of the DRS recovery curve was associated with the SO-perceived severity and burden of physical/dependency status. Growth curve modeling is a meaningful and powerful tool in predicting head injury outcome. (JINS, 2001, 7, 457–467.)

Keywords

Closed-head injuryGrowth curvesOutcome measuresOutcome predictionDisability Rating Scale
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , May 2001 , pp. 457 - 467
Copyright
© 2001 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)