Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:01:22.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The relationship of recency discrimination to explicit memory and executive functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2007

KEVIN J. MANNING
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
BARRY GORDON
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
GODFREY D. PEARLSON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford Hospital/Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut
DAVID J. SCHRETLEN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

Abstract

Recency discrimination has been conceptualized as an executive ability by some investigators and as an aspect of episodic memory by others. We compared the performance of 261 neurologically healthy adults on a recency discrimination task (RDT) with their performance on measures of executive functioning and explicit memory. Mean z-transformed raw scores were used to construct indices of visual and verbal explicit memory, fluency, and executive functioning. Analyses revealed that RDT performance correlated more closely with visual (r = 0.32; p < 0.001) and verbal memory (r = 0.25; p < 0.001) than with fluency (r = 0.16; p < 0.05) and executive functioning (r = 0.13; p < 0.05). These findings suggest that recency discrimination might be better understood as an aspect of episodic memory that is subserved primarily by hippocampal and medial temporal structures than as an executive function that is subserved primarily by prefrontal cortex. (JINS, 2007, 13, 710–715.)

Type
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Copyright
© 2007 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beatty, W.W. & Monson, N. (1991). Memory for temporal order in multiple sclerosis. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 1012.Google Scholar
Benedict, H.R.B. (1997). Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Brandt, J. & Benedict, H.R.B. (2001). Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Bruning, J.L. & Kintz, B.L. (1987). Computational handbook of statistics (3rd ed.). Glenview, IL: Harper-Collins Publishers.
Burgess, P.W., Alderman, N., Evans, J., Emslie, H., & Wilson, B.A. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 547558.Google Scholar
Downes, J.J., Mayes, A.R., MacDonald, C., & Hunkin, N.M. (2002). Temporal order memory in patients with Korsakoff's syndrome and medial temporal amnesia. Neuropsychologia, 40, 853861.Google Scholar
Dumas, J.A. & Hartman, M. (2003). Adult age differences in temporal and item memory. Psychology and Aging, 18, 573586.Google Scholar
Fabiani, M. & Friedman, D. (1997). Dissociations between memory for temporal order and recognition memory in aging. Neuropsychologia, 35, 129141.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. & Kaplan, E. (1983). Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
Grant, D.A. & Berg, E. (1948). A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 404411.Google Scholar
Janowsky, J.S., Shimamura, A.P., & Squire, L.R. (1989). Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 27, 10431056.Google Scholar
Jones-Gotman, M. & Milner, B. (1977). Design fluency: The invention of nonsense drawings after focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychologia, 15, 653674.Google Scholar
Kingery, L.R., Schretlen, D.J., Sateri, S., Langley, L.K., Marano, N.C., & Meyer, S.M. (2006). Interrater and test-retest reliability of a fixed condition design fluency test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 729740.Google Scholar
Kopelman, M.D. (1989). Remote and autobiographical memory, temporal context memory and frontal atrophy in Korsakoff and Alzheimer patients. Neuropsychologia, 27, 437460.Google Scholar
Mangels, J.A. (1997). Strategic processing and memory for temporal order in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology, 11, 207221.Google Scholar
Mayes, A.R., Isaac, C.L., Holdstock, J.S., Hunkin, N.M., Montaldi, D., Downes, J.J., MacDonald, C., Cezayirli, E., & Roberts, J.N. (2001). Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order of different kinds in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 97123.Google Scholar
Milner, B., Corsi, P., & Leonard, G. (1991). Frontal-lobe contribution to recency judgments. Neuropsychologia, 29, 601618.Google Scholar
Nelson, H.E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 11, 918932.Google Scholar
Parkin, A.J. (1992). Functional significance of etiological factors in human amnesia. In L.R. Squire & N. Butters (Eds.), Neuropsychology of memory (pp. 122129). New York: Guilford Press.
Parkin, A.J., Leng, N.R., & Hunkin, N.M. (1990). Differential sensitivity to context in diencephalic and temporal lobe amnesia. Cortex, 26, 373380.Google Scholar
Romine, C.B. & Reynolds, C.R. (2004). Sequential memory: A developmental perspective on its relation to frontal lobe functioning. Neuropsychology Review, 14, 4364.Google Scholar
Schacter, D.L. (1987). Memory, amnesia, and frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychobiology, 15, 2136.Google Scholar
Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. & Wright, M.J. (2003). Content Memory and Temporal Order Memory for Performed Activities After Severe Closed-Head Injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 933948.Google Scholar
Schretlen, D.J., Cascella, N.G., Meyer, S.M., Kingery, L.R., Testa, S.M., Munro, C.A., Pulver, A.E., Rivkin, P., Rao, V.A., Diaz-Asper, C.M., Dickerson, F.B., Yolken, R.H., & Pearlson, G.D. (2006). Neuropsychological functioning in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, (in press).Google Scholar
Schretlen, D., Pearlson, G.D., Anthony, J.C., Aylward, E.H., Augustine, A.M., Davis, A., & Barta, P. (2000). Elucidating the contributions of processing speed, executive ability, and frontal lobe volume to normal age-related differences in fluid intelligence. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 5261.Google Scholar
Shaw, C. & Aggleton, J.P. (1995). Evidence for the independence of recognition and recency memory in amnesic subjects. Cortex, 31, 5771.Google Scholar
Shimamura, A.P. (2002). Memory retrieval and executive control processes. In D.T. Stuss & R.T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 210220). New York: Oxford University Press.
Shimamura, A.P., Janowsky, J.S., & Squire, L.R. (1990). Memory for the temporal order of events in patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia, 28, 803813.Google Scholar
Ward, L.C. (1990). Prediction of verbal, performance, and full scale IQs from seven subtests of the WAIS-R. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 436440.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.