Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T06:52:28.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Affective and Cognitive Verbal Theory of Mind in Schizophrenia: Results From a Novel Paradigm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

Łukasz Okruszek ,
Aleksandra Piejka ,
Ewa Szczepocka ,
Adam Wysokiński  and
Agnieszka Pluta
Łukasz Okruszek*
Affiliation:
Clinical Neuroscience Lab, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Poland
Aleksandra Piejka
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Ewa Szczepocka
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
Adam Wysokiński
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland
Agnieszka Pluta
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Łukasz Okruszek, Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science, Warsaw, Jaracza 1, 00-378 Warsaw. E-mail: lukasz.okruszek@psych.pan.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: Impairments of Theory of Mind (ToM) have been repeatedly demonstrated in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ). However, only a handful of studies have explored deficits in affective and cognitive subcomponents of ToM. Thus, this study aims to examine affective and cognitive ToM abilities in SCZ by using a novel, verbal paradigm. Methods: Twenty-four SCZ and 22 healthy comparison subjects (HC) completed a battery of tasks, which consisted of: (i) Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool for Schizophrenia (B-CATS), (ii) three well-established tasks measuring social cognitive abilities, and (iii) original tasks which assess ability to infer cognitive and affective mental states based on everyday verbal social interactions. Results: In line with previous findings, SCZ were outperformed by HC in all tasks. However, the interaction effect of the group and the task showed that cognitive (as opposed to affective) ToM was more profoundly impaired in patients with SCZ. Conclusions: It is proposed that in SCZ group cognitive ToM is more impaired as it involves more effortful reflective processes, while affective ToM, which is more automatic and based on reflexive processes, may differentiate patients from healthy comparison subjects to a lesser extent. (JINS, 2018, 24, 305–309)

Keywords

Social perceptionCognitionCognitive neuroscienceNeuropsychological testsPsychotic disordersExecutive function
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2018 , pp. 305 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron‐Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high‐functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.Google Scholar
Bottiroli, S., Cavallini, E., Ceccato, I., Vecchi, T., & Lecce, S. (2016). Theory of Mind in aging: Comparing cognitive and affective components in the faux pas test. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 62, 152–162.Google Scholar
Carlson, S.M., & Moses, L.J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72(4), 1032–1053.Google Scholar
Corradi-Dell’Acqua, C., Hofstetter, C., & Vuilleumier, P. (2014). Cognitive and affective theory of mind share the same local patterns of activity in posterior temporal but not medial prefrontal cortex. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(8), 1175–1184. doi: 10.1093/scan/nst097 Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Simic, N., Bigler, E.D., Abildskov, T., Agostino, A., Taylor, H.G., & Yeates, K.O. (2013). Cognitive, affective, and conative theory of mind (ToM) in children with traumatic brain injury. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 25–39.Google Scholar
Fett, A.-K.J., Viechtbauer, W., Dominguez, M.-G., Penn, D.L., van Os, J., & Krabbendam, L. (2011). The relationship between neurocognition and social cognition with functional outcomes in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 573–588.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, M.F., Horan, W.P., & Lee, J. (2015). Social cognition in schizophrenia. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 620–631.Google Scholar
Ho, K.K., Lui, S.S., Hung, K.S., Wang, Y., Li, Z., Cheung, E.F., && Chan, R.C. (2015). Theory of mind impairments in patients with first-episode schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings. Schizophrenia Research, 166(1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jędrasik-Styła, M., Ciołkiewicz, A., Styła, R., Pankowski, D., Denisiuk, M., Linke, M., & Wichniak, A. (2014). The assessment of chosen psychometric features of B-CATS test battery in schizophrenia–preliminary report. Psychiatria Polska, 48(6), 1189–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalbe, E., Schlegel, M., Sack, A.T., Nowak, D.A., Dafotakis, M., Bangard, C., & Kessler, J. (2010). Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: A TMS study. Cortex, 46(6), 769–780. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.010 Google Scholar
Kay, S.R., Opler, L.A., & Lindenmayer, J.P. (1988). Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics. Psychiatry Research, 23(1), 99–110.Google Scholar
Montag, C., Dziobek, I., Richter, I.S., Neuhaus, K., Lehmann, A., Sylla, R., & Gallinat, J. (2011). Different aspects of theory of mind in paranoid schizophrenia: Evidence from a video-based assessment. Psychiatry Research, 186(2), 203–209.Google Scholar
Okruszek, Ł., Bala, A., Wordecha, M., Jarkiewicz, M., Wysokiński, A., Szczepocka, E., & Marchel, A. (2017). Social cognition in neuropsychiatric populations: A comparison of theory of mind in schizophrenia and mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Scientific Reports, 7, 484.Google Scholar
Olszanowski, M., Pochwatko, G., Kuklinski, K., Scibor-Rylski, M., Lewinski, P., & Ohme, R.K. (2015). Warsaw set of emotional facial expression pictures: A validation study of facial display photographs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1516.Google Scholar
Pluta, A., Gawron, N., Sobanska, M., Wójcik, A.D., & Łojek, E. (2017). The nature of the relationship between neurocognition and theory of mind impairments in stroke patients. Neuropsychology, 31, 666–681.Google Scholar
Savla, G.N., Vella, L., Armstrong, C.C., Penn, D.L., & Twamley, E.W. (2013). Deficits in domains of social cognition in schizophrenia: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 39(5), 979–992.Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Shur, S., Barcai-Goodman, L., Medlovich, S., Harari, H., & Levkovitz, Y. (2007). Dissociation of cognitive from affective components of theory of mind in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 149(1), 11–23.Google Scholar
Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 855–863.Google Scholar
Wang, Y.-G., Shi, J., Roberts, D.L., Jiang, X., Shen, Z., Wang, Y., && Wang, K. (2015). Theory-of-mind use in remitted schizophrenia patients: The role of inhibition and perspective-switching. Psychiatry Research, 229(1-2), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2015.06.043 Google Scholar
White, S.J., Coniston, D., Rogers, R., & Frith, U. (2011). Developing the Frith‐Happé animations: A quick and objective test of Theory of Mind for adults with autism. Autism Research, 4(2), 149–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Okruszek et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Okruszek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Okruszek et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Okruszek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 13.2 KB