Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T12:23:41.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2002

LARISSA A. MEAD
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
ANDREW R. MAYER
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
JULIE A. BOBHOLZ
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
SCOTT J. WOODLEY
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
JOSEPH M. CUNNINGHAM
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
THOMAS A. HAMMEKE
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
STEPHEN M. RAO
Affiliation:
Division of Neuropsychology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Abstract

Previous neuroimaging studies of the Stroop task have postulated that the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a critical role in resolution of the Stroop interference condition. However, activation of the ACC is not invariably seen and appears to depend on a variety of methodological factors, including the degree of response conflict and response expectancies. The present functional MRI study was designed to identify those brain areas critically involved in the interference condition. Healthy subjects underwent a blocked-trial design fMRI experiment while responding to 1 of 3 stimulus conditions: (1) incongruent color words, (2) congruent color words, and (3) color-neutral words. Subjects responded to the printed color of the word via a manual response. Compared to the congruent and neutral conditions, the incongruent condition produced significant activation within the left inferior precentral sulcus (IpreCS) located on the border between the inferior frontal gyrus, pars opercularis (BA 44) and the ventral premotor region (BA 6). Significant deactivations in the rostral component of the ACC and the posterior cingulate gyrus were also observed. Selective activation of the left IpreCS is compatible with findings from previous neuroimaging, lesion, electrophysiological, and behavioral studies and is presumably related to the mediation of competing articulatory demands during the interference condition. (JINS, 2002, 8, 735–742.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2002 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)