Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-ftpnm Total loading time: 0.311 Render date: 2021-09-22T16:13:15.444Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Mathematical Skills in 3- and 5-Year-Olds with Spina Bifida and Their Typically Developing Peers: A Longitudinal Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2011

Marcia A. Barnes*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Houston, Texas
Allison Stubbs
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
Kimberly P. Raghubar
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
Alba Agostino
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario
Heather Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Houston, Texas
Susan Landry
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, Houston, Texas
Jack M. Fletcher
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
Brenda Smith-Chant
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario
*Corresponding
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Marcia A. Barnes, University of Texas Health Science Center-Houston, 7000 Fannin Street, Suite 2400, Houston, Texas 77030. E-mail: marcia.barnes@uth.tmc.edu

Abstract

Preschoolers with spina bifida (SB) were compared to typically developing (TD) children on tasks tapping mathematical knowledge at 36 months (n = 102) and 60 months of age (n = 98). The group with SB had difficulty compared to TD peers on all mathematical tasks except for transformation on quantities in the subitizable range. At 36 months, vocabulary knowledge, visual–spatial, and fine motor abilities predicted achievement on a measure of informal math knowledge in both groups. At 60 months of age, phonological awareness, visual–spatial ability, and fine motor skill were uniquely and differentially related to counting knowledge, oral counting, object-based arithmetic skills, and quantitative concepts. Importantly, the patterns of association between these predictors and mathematical performance were similar across the groups. A novel finding is that fine motor skill uniquely predicted object-based arithmetic abilities in both groups, suggesting developmental continuity in the neurocognitive correlates of early object-based and later symbolic arithmetic problem solving. Models combining 36-month mathematical ability and these language-based, visual–spatial, and fine motor abilities at 60 months accounted for considerable variance on 60-month informal mathematical outcomes. Results are discussed with reference to models of mathematical development and early identification of risk in preschoolers with neurodevelopmental disorder. (JINS, 2011, 17, 431–444)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alibali, M.W., DiRusso, A.A. (1999). The function of gesture in learning to count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development, 14, 3756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, D., Dhital, B. (2006). Age-related changes in the activation of the intraparietal sulcus during nonsymbolic magnitude processing: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 18201828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, D., Donlan, C., Thomas, M.S.C., Ewing, S.A., Peen, T., Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 5062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assel, M.A., Landry, S.H., Swank, P., Smith, K.E., Steelman, L.M. (2003). Precursors to mathematical skills: Examining the roles of visual-spatial skills, executive processes, and parenting factors. Applied Developmental Science, 7, 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayr, L.K., Yeates, K.O., Enrile, B.G. (2005). Arithmetic skills and their cognitive correlates in children with acquired and congenital brain disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 11, 249262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, M.A., Dennis, M. (1992). Reading in children and adolescents after early onset hydrocephalus and in their normally developing age-peers: Phonological analysis, word recognition, word comprehension, and passage comprehension skill. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 17, 445456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, M.A., Pengelly, S., Dennis, M., Wilkinson, M., Rogers, T., Faulkner, H. (2002). Mathematics skills in good readers with hydrocephalus. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 7282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, M.A., Smith-Chant, B., Landry, S. (2005). Number processing in neurodevelopmental disorders: Spina bifida myelomeningocele. In Campbell, J. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 299314). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, M.A., Wilkinson, M., Khemani, E., Boudesquie, A., Dennis, M., Fletcher, J.M. (2006). Arithmetic processing in children with spina bifida: Calculation accuracy, strategy use, and fact retrieval fluency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 174187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berch, D.B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisanz, J., Sherman, J.L., Rasmussen, C., Ho, E. (2005). Development of arithmetic skills and knowledge in preschool children. In Campbell, J.I.D. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 143162). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Blair, C., Razza, R.P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Development, 78, 647663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briars, D., Siegler, R.S. (1984). A featural analysis of preschoolers’ counting knowledge. Developmental Psychology, 20, 607618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, R. (2007). Commentary Part II, Section III: Neuropsychological factors. In Berch, D.B.Mazzocco, M.M.M. (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 265278). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Bull, R., Espy, K.A., Wiebe, S.A. (2008). Short-term memory, working memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal predictors of mathematical achievement at 7 years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 205228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, B. (1999). The mathematical brain. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Coughlin, J., Montague, M. (2010). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of adolescents with spina bifida. Journal of Special Education, doi:10.1177/0022466910363913.Google Scholar
de Jong, P.F., van der Leij, A. (2002). Effects of phonological abilities and linguistic comprehension on the development of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6, 5177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, B., Taylor, J., Archibald, L., Ansari, D. (2009). How is phonological processing related to individual differences in children's arithmetic skills? Developmental Science, 13, 508520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S., Izard, V., Spelke, E., Pica, P. (2008). Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science, 30, 12171220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., Cohen, L. (2005). Three parietal circuits for number processing. In Campbell, J.I.D. (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 433453). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Barnes, M. (2002). Math and numeracy in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Developmental Neuropsychology, 21, 141155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M., Barnes, M.A. (2010). The cognitive phenotype of spina bifida meningomyelocele. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 16, 3139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M., Fletcher, J.M., Rogers, S., Hetherington, R., Francis, D. (2002). Object-based and action-based visual perception in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 95106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dennis, M., Landry, S.H., Barnes, M., Fletcher, J.M. (2006). A model of neurocognitive function in spina bifida over the life span. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 285296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durand, M., Hulme, C., Larkin, R., Snowling, M. (2005). The cognitive foundations of reading and arithmetic skills in 7- to 10-year olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 113136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
English, L.H., Barnes, M.A., Taylor, H.B., Landry, S.H. (2009). Mathematical development in spina bifida. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 2834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M.H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex, 44, 386392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, J.M., Copeland, K., Frederick, J., Blaser, S.E., Kramer, L.A., Northrup, H., Dennis, M. (2005). Spinal lesion level in spina bifida meningomyelocele: A source of neural and cognitive heterogeneity. Journal of Neurosurgery, 102(Suppl. 3), 268279.Google ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, J.M., Dennis, M., Northrup, H., Barnes, M.A., Hannay, H.J., Landry, S., Francis, D.J. (2004). Spina bifida: Genes, brain, and development. In Glidden, L. (Ed.), International review of research in mental retardation (pp. 63117). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Friedrich, W.N., Lovejoy, M.C., Shaffer, J., Shurtleff, D.B., Beilke, R.L. (1991). Cognitive abilities and achievement status of children with myelomeningocele: A contemporary sample. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 16, 423428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, L.S., Geary, D.C., Compton, D.L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C.L., Bryant, J.D. (2010). The contributions of numerosity and domain-general abilities to school readiness. Child Development, 81(5), 15201533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geary, D.C., Bailey, D.H., Littlefield, A., Wood, P., Hoard, M.K., Nugent, L. (2009). First-grade predictors of mathematical learning disability: A latent class trajectory analysis. Cognitive Development, 24, 411429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., Hamson, C.O. (1999). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: Patterns of functions and deficits in children at risk for a mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74, 213239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, R., Galistell, C.R. (1978). The child's understanding of number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, H.P., Baroody, A.J. (1990). Test of early mathematics ability (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, H.P., Klein, A., Starkey, P. (1998). The development of children's mathematical thinking: Connecting research with practice. In Damon, W., Sigel, I.E.Renninger, A.K. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (5th ed., Vol 4, pp. 401476). NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Hanich, L.B., Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 615626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, S.A., Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A. (2001). The relations between phonological processing abilities and emerging individual differences in mathematical computation skills: A longitudinal study from second to fifth grades. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 192227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hetherington, R., Dennis, M., Barnes, M., Drake, J., Gentili, F. (2006). Functional outcome in young adults with spina bifida and hydrocephalus. Child Nervous System, 22, 117124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodent, C., Bryant, P., Houde, O. (2005). Language-specific effects on number computation in toddlers. Developmental Science, 8, 420423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollingshead, J. (1975). A four-factor index of social position. New Haven, CT: Author.Google Scholar
Jordan, N.C., Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S.C. (1992). Differential calculation abilities in young children from middle- and lower-income families. Developmental Psychology, 28, 644653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N.C., Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S.C. (1994). Assessing early arithmetic abilities: Effects of verbal and nonverbal response types on the calculation performance of middle- and low-income children. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 413432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., Locuniak, M.N., Ramineni, C. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 3646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, N.C., Kaplan, D., Olah, L.N., Locuniak, M.N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77, 153175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamawar, D., LeFevre, J.-A., Bisanz, J., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B., Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Knowledge of counting principles: How relevant is order irrelevance? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 138145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krajewski, K., Schneider, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual-spatial working memory, and preschool quantity-number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 516531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeFevre, J.-A. (2000). Research on the development of academic skills: Introduction to the special issue on early literacy and early numeracy. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 5760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeFevre, J.-A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Smith-Chant, B.L., Bisanz, J., Kamawar, D., Penner-Wilger, M. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81(6), 17531767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeFevre, J.-A., Smith-Chant, B.L., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Sargla, E., Arnup, J.S., Kamawar, D. (2006). What counts as knowing? The development of conceptual and procedural knowledge of counting from kindergarten through grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 285303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lomax-Bream, L.E., Barnes, M., Copeland, K., Taylor, H.B., Landry, S.H. (2007). The impact of spina bifida on development across the first three years. Developmental Neuropsychology, 31, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, K.F., Smith, C.M., Zhu, J., Zhang, H. (1995). Preschool origins of cross-national differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science, 6, 5660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mix, K.S., Huttenlocher, J., Levine, S.C. (2002). Quantitative development in infancy and early childhood. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Rettinger, D.A., Shah, P., Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621640.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noel, M. (2005). Finger gnosia: A predictor of numerical abilities in children? Child Neuropsychology, 11, 413430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noles, N.S., Scholl, B.J., Mitroff, S.R. (2005). The persistence of object file representations. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 324334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penner-Wilger, M., Anderson, M.L. (2008). An alternative view of the relation between finger gnosis and math ability: Redeployment of finger representations for the representation of number. In Love, B.C., McRae, K.Sloutsky, V.M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 16471652). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Penner-Wilger, M., Fast, L., LeFevre, J., Smith-Chant, B.L., Skwarchuk, S., Kamawar, D., Bisanz, J. (2007). The foundations of numeracy: Subitizing, finger gnosia, and fine-motor ability. In McNamara, D.S.Trafton, J.G. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 13851390). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B., Price, C.J. (2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? Neuroimage, 15, 435446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Price, C.J., Butterworth, B. (2006). Exact and approximate judgments of visual and auditory numerosity: An fMRI study. Brain Research, 1106, 177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghubar, K.P., Barnes, M.A., Hecht, S.A. (2010). Working memory and mathematics: A review of developmental, individual difference, and cognitive approaches. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 110122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghubar, K., Cirino, P., Barnes, M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, L. (2009). Errors in multi-digit arithmetic and behavioral inattention in children with math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 356371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, C., Bisanz, J. (2005). Representation and working memory in early arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 137157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmussen, C., Ho, E., Bisanz, J. (2003). Use of the mathematical principle of inversion in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 89102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, F.R., Singleton, C. (2008). Do weak phonological representations impact on arithmetic development? A review of research into arithmetic and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 14, 7794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swanson, H.L., Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 76, 249274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorndike, R.L., Hagen, E.P., Sattler, J.M. (1989). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (4th ed.). Chicago: Riverside.Google Scholar
Trick, L.M., Plyshyn, Z.W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 10, 80102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Wills, K.E. (1993). Neuropsychological functioning in children with spina bifida and/or hydrocephalus. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 22, 247265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodcock, R.M., Johnson, M.B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery – Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.Google Scholar
24
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Mathematical Skills in 3- and 5-Year-Olds with Spina Bifida and Their Typically Developing Peers: A Longitudinal Approach
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Mathematical Skills in 3- and 5-Year-Olds with Spina Bifida and Their Typically Developing Peers: A Longitudinal Approach
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Mathematical Skills in 3- and 5-Year-Olds with Spina Bifida and Their Typically Developing Peers: A Longitudinal Approach
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *