Hostname: page-component-cd4964975-pf4mj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-27T18:15:57.481Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Criterion validity of new WAIS–III subtest scores after traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2002

Mary Free Bed Hospital & Rehabilitation Center, Grand Rapids, Michigan
Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research & Education Corporation, West Orange, New Jersey
The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, Texas


The criterion validity of the new subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Third Edition (WAIS–III; Wechsler, 1997) was evaluated in a sample of 100 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Letter–Number Sequencing and Symbol Search, but not Matrix Reasoning, yielded statistically significant differences in performance between patients with moderate–severe TBI, patients with mild TBI, and demographically matched controls. Level of education accounted for a statistically significant amount of variance in the performance of patients with TBI, in addition to that explained by injury severity variables. It is concluded that Letter–Number Sequencing and Symbol Search have satisfactory criterion validity, but that they need to be supplemented with other measures in the context of neuropsychological evaluations. Matrix Reasoning, on the other hand, is not sensitive to the sequelae of TBI and more studies are needed to determine how it can be used for neuropsychological assessment purposes. (JINS, 2001, 7, 892–898.)

Research Article
© 2001 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)