Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:33:12.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EUGENICS AND SOCIALIST THOUGHT IN THE PROGRESSIVE ERA: THE CASE OF JAMES MEDBERY MACKAYE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 June 2018

Luca Fiorito  and
Tiziana Foresti
Luca Fiorito
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Palermo
Tiziana Foresti
Affiliation:
Bocconi University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this essay is to assess James Medbery MacKaye’s contribution to socialist thought during the Progressive Era. Largely forgotten today, MacKaye proposed a special version of socialism, which he called “Pantocracy,” based on a peculiar blend of utilitarian and eugenic assumptions. Specifically, MacKaye held that biological fitness mapped to the capacity for happiness—biologically superior individuals possess a greater capacity for happiness—and saw the eugenic breeding of “a being or race of beings capable in the first place of happiness” as a possibility open by the advent of Pantocracy. Incidentally, this essay provides further evidence that the influence of eugenic and racialist beliefs upon the American Progressive Era political economy was so deep-rooted and pervasive that it did cut across traditional ideological boundaries.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 40 , Issue 3 , September 2018 , pp. 377 - 388
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We wish to thank Mary Furner, David Levy, Sandra Peart, and Malcom Rutherford for advice and criticism. The usual caveat applies.

References

REFERENCES

“A Heretic Who Doubts the Theories of Einstein.” 1931. New York Times, January 25.Google Scholar
Albertson, Ralph. 1906. “Review of The Economy of Happiness by James MacKaye.” The Arena 36 (205): 670.Google Scholar
Allen, Garland. 1983. “Misuse of Biological Hierarchies: The American Eugenics Movement 1900–1940.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 5 (2): 105–128.Google Scholar
Anderson, Larry. 2002. Benton MacKaye: Conservationist, Planner, and Creator of the Appalachian Trail. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Arner, George L. 1919. “Review of Americanized Socialism by James MacKaye.” American Economic Review 9 (1): 147.Google Scholar
Cot, Annie L. 2005. “‘Breed out the Unfit and Breed in the Fit’: Irving Fisher, Economics, and the Science of Heredity.” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64 (3): 893–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowdon, James S. 1892. “Pantocracy; or, The Reign of Justice.” Washington, DC: The Author.Google Scholar
Carver, Thomas N. 1915. Essays in Social Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Economics and Eugenics: Review of a Book by Thomas Nixon Carver.” 1917. Journal of Heredity 8 (3): 120.Google Scholar
Fairchild, Henry P. 1915. “Review of The Happiness of Nations: A Beginning in Political Engineering by James MacKaye.” American Economic Review 5 (4): 830–832.Google Scholar
Fiorito, Luca. 2013. “Between Progressivism and Institutionalism: Albert Benedict Wolfe on Eugenics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 35 (4): 449–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorito, Luca, and Orsi, Cosma. 2017. “‘Survival Value and a Robust, Practical, Joyless Individualism’: Thomas Nixon Carver, Social Justice, and Eugenics.” History of Political Economy 49 (3): 469–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galton, Francis. 1901. “The Possible Improvement of the Human Breed under the Existing Conditions of Law and Sentiment.” Nature 64 (October): 659–665.Google Scholar
Kevles, Daniel. 1995. “In the Name of Eugenics.” Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2003. “‘More Merciful and Not Less Effective’: Eugenics and American Economics in the Progressive Era.” History of Political Economy 35 (4): 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, Thomas C. 2016. Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics, and American Economics in the Progressive Era. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1911. “All the MacKayes.” The International 3 (January): 29.Google Scholar
MacKaye, James M. 1906. The Economy of Happiness. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKaye, James M. 1915. The Happiness of Nations: A Beginning in Political Engineering. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar
MacKaye, James M. 1918. Americanized Socialism: A Yankee View of Capitalism. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
MacKaye, James M. 1930. “The Theory of Relativity: For What Is It a Disguise?” Journal of Philosophy 27 (5): 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKaye, James M. 1931. The Dynamic Universe. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Nearing, Scott. 1912. The Super Race: An American Problem. New York: B. W. Huebsch.Google Scholar
“Notes.” 1911. American Economic Review 1 (1): 199–211.Google Scholar
Paul, Diane. 1995. “Controlling Human Heredity, 1865 to the Present.” Amherst Books: Humanity Press.Google Scholar
Peart, Sandra J., and Levy, David M.. 2003. “Denying Human Homogeneity: Eugenics & the Making of Postclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 25 (3): 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, Sandra J., and Levy, David M.. 2005a. The “Vanity of the Philosopher”: From Equality to Hierarchy in Post-Classical Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, Sandra J., and Levy, David M.. 2005b. “From Cardinal to Ordinal Utility Theory: Darwin and Differential Capacity for Happiness.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 64 (3): 851–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittenger, Mark. 1993. American Socialists and Evolutionary Thought, 1870–1920. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
“Prof. J. M. MacKaye, Scientist, Dies, 62: Author of “Radiation” Theory.” 1935. New York Times, January 23.Google Scholar
Saltmarsh, John A. 1991. Scott Nearing: An Intellectual Biography. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Small, Albion W. 1907. “Review of The Economy of Happiness by James MacKaye.” American Journal of Sociology 12 (4): 566–568.Google Scholar
Teachers in Harvard University. 1910. A Guide to Readings in Social Ethics and Allied Subjects. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Taussig, Frank W. 1911. Principles of Economics. Volume 2. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wright, William K. 1935. “James M. MacKaye.” Dartmouth Alumni Magazine 26 (March): 27.Google Scholar