Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:23:44.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Horwitz's Article

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Allin Cottrell
Allin Cottrell
Affiliation:
Wake Forest University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Austrian economics is arousing increasing interest, not to say enthusiasm, these days. No doubt this is in part due to the collapse of the planned economies of the Soviet type, which has lent credibility to the claims of Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek regarding the impossibility of rational economic calculation under socialism-claims which were disputed by the mainstream neoclassical economists of a generation ago. The phenomenon also reflects a relatively long-standing dissatisfaction with neoclassical economics. For many years it was the radical critics of capitalism who felt most keenly the attractions of alternative approaches in economics. Now, increasingly, champions of the market are coming to believe that neoclassical theory does not offer a deep and firm enough basis for asserting the virtues of the market system, and the counterproductive effects of government intervention therein.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Fall 1996 , pp. 308 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cottrell, Allin. 1994. “Hayek's Early Cycle Theory Re-examined,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, 197–212.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935. Prices and Production, revised ed., Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1966. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle, Augustus M. Kelley, New York.Google Scholar
Horwitz, Steven. 1996. “Capital Theory, Inflation and Deflation: The Austrians and Monetary Disequilibrium Theory Compared,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1930. A Treatise on Money, 2, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Laidler, David. 1994. “Hayek on Neutral Money and the Cycle,” in Marina, Colonna and Harald, Hagemann, eds. Money and Business Cycles: The Economics of F. A. Hayek, 1, Edward Elgar, Aldershot.Google Scholar
Lawlor, Michael S. and Horn, Bobbie L.. 1992. “Notes on the Sraffa Hayek Exchange,” Review of Political Economy, 4, 317–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, Piero. 1932. “Dr. Hayek on Money and Capital,” Economic Journal, 42, March, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trautwein, Hans-Michael. 1966. “Hayek's Wicksellian Dichotomy,” History of Political Economy, 28, Spring, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar