Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:58:35.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rise of big philanthropy in global social policy: implications for policy transfer and analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2021

ROOSA LAMBIN Open the ORCID record for ROOSA LAMBIN [Opens in a new window]  and
REBECCA SURENDER
ROOSA LAMBIN
Affiliation:
Dphil, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford email: Lambin.roosa@gmail.com
REBECCA SURENDER
Affiliation:
Senior Research Fellow, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford email: Rebecca.surender@gtc.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new group of Western development donors has emerged as increasingly influential actors in global social policy. Big philanthropies have begun implementing social protection projects on a vast scale across the Global South and have become integrated within global governance structures. It is essential to examine whether their approach to social policy in the South is effective, legitimate and desirable for the substantive agendas and programmes in these countries and for analysis of social policy in a development context. This study investigates contemporary big philanthropies through a qualitative case-study of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and its role in the health sector in Tanzania. It examines the ways in which big philanthropies engage and seek to influence policy on the ground, directly exploring the views and experiences of local stakeholders. The study finds that big philanthropies have distinctive features and mechanisms as global social policy entrepreneurs. In contrast to the vertical and linear processes associated with traditional policy transfer, a more messy and complex set of mechanisms are observed. The study also indicates that despite considerable resources and authority, philanthropic donors may not be effective in securing policy reform within aid-receiving countries due to a lack of transparency and embeddedness.

Keywords

philanthropysocial policypolicy transferGates Foundation
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , July 2023 , pp. 602 - 619
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appuhami, R., Perera, S. and Perera, H. (2011), ‘Coercive Policy Diffusion in a Developing Country: The Case of Public-Private Partnerships in Sri Lanka’, Journal of Contemporary Asia 41, 3, 431–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asmus, G., Fuchs, A. and Muller, A. (2017), BRICS and Foreign Aid, Working paper 43, AidData at William & Mary’s Global Research Institute, Williamsbourg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkan, J. (2012), 'Hired Guns on Astroturf: How to Buy and Sell School Reform'. DISSENT, https://www.dissentmagazine.org/article/hired-guns-on-astroturfhow-to-buy-and-sell-school-reform [accessed 31.7.2021].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, M. and Green, M. (2009), Philanthro-capitalism: how giving can save the world. Bloomsbury Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bridgespan Group (2019), 'Unleashing Philanthropy’s Big Bets for Social Change', Supplement publication, Stanford Social Innovation Review.Google Scholar
Capgemini (2021), World Wealth Report 2021. Capgemini Research Institute.Google Scholar
Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N. and Stubbs, P. (2015), Making policy move: towards a politics of translation and assemblage. Policy Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
Collier, P., Guillaumont, P. and Guillaumont, S. (1997), ‘Redesigning Conditionality’, World Development 25, 9, 1399–1407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B. (2007), Global social policy & governance. Sage Publications, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, D. P. and Marsh, D. (1996), ‘Who Learns What from Whom? A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’, Political Studies 44, 2, 343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolowitz, D. P. and Marsh, D. (2000), ‘Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making’, Governance 13, 1, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, M. (2011), The Role and Limitations of Philanthropy, Commission Paper, The Bellagio Initiative. Demos, New York.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Evans, M. (2013), New Directions in the Study of Policy Transfer. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fejerskov, A. M. (2018), ‘Development asresistance and translation: Remaking norms and ideas of the Gates Foundation’, Progress in Development Studies 18, 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993417750287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, A. and Whitfield, L. (2008), ‘Understanding Contemporary Aid Relationships’, in Whitfield, L. (ed.), The Politics of Aid: African Strategies for Dealing with Donors. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 74–107.Google Scholar
Gale, N. K., Heath, G., Cameron, E., Rashid, S. and Redwood, S. (2013), ‘Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research’, BMC Medical Research Methodology 13, 117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelles, D. (2015), ‘Major Foundations, Eager for Big Change, Aim High’, The New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/08/giving/major-foundations-eager-for-big-change-aim-high.html [accessed 1.7.2021].Google Scholar
Gough, I. and Wood, G.D. (2004), Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa, and Latin America: social policy in development contexts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjiisky, M., Pal, L. A. and Walker, C. (2017), Public policy transfer: micro-dynamics and macro effects, New horizons in public policy. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham; Northampton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harman, S. (2016), ‘The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Legitimacy in Global Health Governance’, Global Governance 22, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, R. (2005), ‘Policy Transfer and the Internationalisation of Social Policy’, Social Policy and Society 4, 4, 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. (2018), Global Philanthropy Report. Perspectives on the global foundation sector. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jung, T. and Harrow, J. (2015), ‘New development: Philanthropy in networked governance—treading with care’, Public Money & Management 35, 1, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, T. and Harrow, J. (2019), ‘Providing Foundations: Philanthropy, Global Policy, and Administration’, in Stone, D. and Moloney, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Kaasch, A. and Martens, K. (2015), Actors and agency in global social governance. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpi, W. (1983), The democratic class struggle. Routledge & K. Paul, London; Boston.Google Scholar
Lauria, V. and Fumagalli, C. (2019), ‘BRICS, the southern model, and the evolving landscape of development assistance: Toward a new taxonomy’, Public Administration and Development 39, 4-5, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahajan, M. (2018), ‘Philanthropy and the nation-state in global health: The Gates Foundation in India’, Global Public Health 13, 10, 1357–1368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, D. and Sharman, J.C. (2009), ‘Policy diffusion and policy transfer’, Policy Studies 30, 3, 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGoey, L. (2015), No such thing as a free gift: the Gates Foundation and the price of philanthropy. Verso, London; New York.Google Scholar
Midgley, J., Alfers, L. and Surender, R. (2019), Handbook of social policy and development. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham; Northampton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morvaridi, B. (2015), New philanthropy and social justice: debating the conceptual and policy discourse. Policy Press, Bristol; Chicago.Google Scholar
O’Brien, R. (2002), ‘Organizational Politics, Multilateral Economic Organizations and Social Policy’, Global Social Policy 2, 2, 141–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD (2018), Private Philanthropy for Development, The Development Dimension. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2020a), Private philanthropy for the SDGs. Insights from the latest OECD DAC statistics. OECD Publishing, Paris.Google Scholar
OECD (2020b), Development Co-operation Profiles, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/sites/da5658fd-en/index.html?itemId=/content/component/da5658fd-en [accessed 5.7.2021].Google Scholar
Papanastasiou, N. (2019), The politics of scale in policy: scalecraft and education governance. Policy Press, Bristol.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (1994), Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porto de Oliveira, O. (2021), Handbook of policy transfer, diffusion and circulation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, R. (2018), Just giving: why philanthropy is failing democracy and how it can do better. Princeton University Press, Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, D. T. (2014), ‘Bearing tales: networks and narratives in social policy transfer’, Journal of Global History 9, 2, 301–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schervish, P. (2003), Hyperagency and High-Tech Donors: A New Theory of the New Philanthropists. Social Welfare Research Institute, Boston Institute.Google Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2020), From Colonialism to International Aid: External Actors and Social Protection in the Global South. Springer International Publishing, Cham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, A. and Thompson, S.B. (2009), ‘Framework analysis: A qualitative methodology for applied policy research’, Journal of Administration and Governance 4, 72–79.Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2017), ‘Global Governance Depoliticized. Knowledge Networks, Scientization, and Anti-Policy', in Fawcett, P., Flinders, M., Hay, C. and Wood, M. (eds.), Anti-Politics, Depoliticization, and Governance. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Stone, D. and Moloney, K. (2019), The Oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, P. (2005), ‘Stretching Concepts Too Far? Multi-level Governance, Policy Transfer and the Politics of Scale in South East Europe’, Southeast European Politics 6, 2, 66–87.Google Scholar
Surender, R. and Walker, R. (2013), Social policy in a developing world. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN (2013), A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies Through Sustainable Development, The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. UN, Geneva.Google Scholar
Wilensky, H. L. (1974), The welfare state and equality: structural and ideological roots of public expenditures. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Youde, J. (2018), ‘Philanthropy and Global Health’, in McInnes, C., Lee, K. and Youde, J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Global Health Politics. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Youde, J. (2019), ‘The role of philanthropy in international relations’, Review of International Studies 45, 1, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar