Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T16:08:29.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Homely Residential Care: A Contradiction in Terms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2001

SHEILA PEACE
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Welfare, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA
CAROLINE HOLLAND
Affiliation:
School of Health and Social Welfare, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA

Abstract

Accommodation and care for older people is commonly thought of in relation to residential care homes: the collective settings with communal lounges and dining rooms, where older people may live what seems to be a fine balance between individual and group routines. Yet, while there have been changes to the living arrangements of people in relatively large collective groups, the ideal put forward as a basis for care settings has remained that of ‘home’, with the family model still central. With the tensions between public and private, domestic and institutional living, regulated and non-regulated settings, all too obvious, this article uses a pilot study in Bedfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Hertfordshire of registered small homes with less than four residential places, often run by the proprietor and her family, to consider whether residential homes may replicate a homely environment, or whether the model has run its course.

Type
Article
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on this article.